Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advantis chasing old powergen / EON debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone

 

I received a letter about 2-3 weeks ago from Advantis saying if it was addressed to the wrong person please ring them to tell them and if it was the right person to ring them anyway - threatening that I owed money but didnt say an amount or who to. I ignored it.

 

Just got another letter from Advantis today "Notice of intent to commence debt collection action" It is addressed to my maiden name and my now husband saying we owe £271.92 outstanding balance and they acting on behalf of Eon (formlerly known as Powergen). This is from an old address we did live at. Unfortunately when we left and paid in full I did not keep any paperwork and so have no way of proving i dont owe this money!!!

 

It states "to avoid Advantis taking further action you must either pay it in full or ring them on tel no.....)

 

I have no intention of ringing them - it states that the bill is for the period ending 01/10/03 - am i right in thinking that this will be covered by the 6 year ruling when October 09 comes? It seems to me that they are just phishing to see if they can get anyone to respond so that they can stop the clock ticking. The clock was or should have been stopped when we moved from the address and paid up what we owed which was not that amount anyway!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Does the 6 year ruling apply to utility bills like gas, electric, water?

 

What would you suggest I do now? I dont want to stop the clock and my gut feeling is to ignore, but I dont want to be slapped with a Court Order either when I dont owe them anything.

 

Hope someone can give me some solid advice.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The clock only stops ticking if you make payment or written acknowledgement within the six year period. If they get too persistent you can send them this;

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

 

Remember, don’t sign the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello everyone

 

I have been receiving letters address to myself and my husband for a couple of months from Advantis. First they just demanded an amount of money but didnt state what for. Then we received a "Notice of Intent to Commence Debt Collection Action" on pale pink paper!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is set out like a Court Summons.

 

It says that we have to pay X amount by 23 March or failure to pay may result in debt collector being instructed to visit and collect the debt personally OR Advantis Credit may instruct Solicitors to commence legal action and this may result in a judgement being recorded against us.

 

I have noticed on this last letter that it states it is for a property that we previously lived at in 2002/2003 we left there back end of 2003. This is for electricity used, I cannot remember exactly who the electric company was, but I am quite sure that this was paid, although because its so long ago I havent got any paperwork to prove this.

 

It says that this is for period ending Oct 2003. Am I right in thinking that Advantis are either just on a phishing trip to see if they can get some money from us, and/or as they say this debt is from Oct 2003 it is coming up to 6 years in this October and would not be enforceable then.

 

Would you suggest I carry on ignoring them? I do not even know if this amount is correct, if or how much has been added in costs etc. I am at a loss really because I dont think I owed the elctricity anything anyway.

 

If someone could advise I would be grateful.

 

Thanks

 

CS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that 42 Man but I cant remember who the electricity provider was and I am sure when we left we paid all the bills outstanding. what would you suggest I do in these circumstances as I cant contact and electricity provider if I dont know which one is was, and I am quite sure that I dont owe anything.

 

Thanks

 

CS

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can't remember who the energy provider was send the 'prove it' letter below to Advantis & with their response you should know who it was, then you can SAR the provider to see your account details and when the last payment was made.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to you.

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

 

Remember, don’t sign the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its set out like a court summons then its a breach of the OFT debt collection guidelines and a complaint should be made to OFT

 

 

Communication

2.1 It is unfair to communicate, in whatever form, with consumers in an unclear,

inaccurate or misleading manner.

2.2 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

a. use of official looking documents intended or likely to mislead

debtors as to their status, for example, documents made to resemble court

claims.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi

 

I sent the Prove It Letter on 23.04.09 to Advtantis. I then had a letter from them dated 1 May 2009 stating that they confirmed they were pursuing the debt on behalf of their client for an address and gave dates, it also stated that they had requested a copy of the bill from their client and would pass this on as soon as possible.

 

It also stated that if i believe that this outstanding balance is not owed I should provide copy documentation relating to the dates i occupied the property ie council tax bill for full billing period etc or letter from letting agent. It also asks me to ring them on a priority tel line.

 

As i Have not received this copy bill or anything else I was waiting for them to send the copy bill, as yet nothing has arrived.

 

I have now received a letter dated 6 July 2009, it says that their receords show that I have not responded to their previous letter requesting that i contact them and that if they do not hear from me within 14 days they will take action to recover the debt.

 

What do I do now. I thought the owness was on them to prove that I owed this debt (which I dont believe I do) not the other way round. And why are they allowed to commence proceedings against me whilst ignoring my letters (prove it) and they said they would send copy bill which they havent.

 

If anyone can help and tell me what to do next I would be most grateful.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I sent the Prove It Letter on 23.04.09 to Advtantis. I then had a letter from them dated 1 May 2009 stating that they confirmed they were pursuing the debt on behalf of their client for an address and gave dates, it also stated that they had requested a copy of the bill from their client and would pass this on as soon as possible.

 

It also stated that if i believe that this outstanding balance is not owed I should provide copy documentation relating to the dates i occupied the property ie council tax bill for full billing period etc or letter from letting agent. It also asks me to ring them on a priority tel line.

 

As i Have not received this copy bill or anything else I was waiting for them to send the copy bill, as yet nothing has arrived.

 

I have now received a letter dated 6 July 2009, it says that their receords show that I have not responded to their previous letter requesting that i contact them and that if they do not hear from me within 14 days they will take action to recover the debt.

 

What do I do now. I thought the owness was on them to prove that I owed this debt (which I dont believe I do) not the other way round. And why are they allowed to commence proceedings against me whilst ignoring my letters (prove it) and they said they would send copy bill which they havent.

 

If anyone can help and tell me what to do next I would be most grateful.

 

Thanks

 

Send a short letter back by recorded delivery.

 

 

Dear Trying-it-on

 

I refer you to my previous letter dated xx/xx/xxxx asking you to prove the debt. To date you have not supplied the bill you advised of in your letter xx/xx/xxxx. Until such time as you prove the debt you are in breach of OFT debt collection guidelines attempting to collect on a debt that you have been asked to prove, and complaints to the relevant authorities will follow.

 

Yours no-mug.

S.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks

 

I did send that letter back and I have received copies of all the bills from that property for 2002 - 2003 and it says that there is an outstanding amount - which I know we paid when we left. I am really fuming now because I obviously havent got the paperwork as its just short of six years ago and I wasnt expecting to have to keep paperwork that long - although I will be doing from now on....... so what do you suggest I do now????

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent the prove it letter to Advtanis relating to a bill from a former address, this bill is from when i left and i paid it but i do not have proof that i paid it. Advantis have now sent me copies of all the bills from the time that i lived at the address including the last bill and say that i owe this amount. As i am no longer with the same bank and have no paperwork from then as it was October 2003 what do i do now. I understand I cannot CCA a utility company but surely I do not have to pay a bill i have already paid??? Is there anything else I can do? or are these people able to just carry on every so many years asking for the same debt over and over again?

 

PLEASE SOMEONE ADVISE ON WHAT TO DO NOW!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess you have already phoned the utility involved to check the last payment they have recorded. Advantis do not seem noted for accuracy.

 

However to prove payment if you think it was mad thro' your bank, you can apply to your previous bank for your statements from 2003. They may charge you per statement & it may be more economical to send a SAR (£10.00) specifically requesting copies from this time & any other data they may have on you. The template is here:

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates/110--data-protection-act-1998-subject-access-request-

 

All records should be kept for a minimum of 6 years from the date of closure of your account so don't let the bank fob you off.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Foolishgirl

 

It was not made through the bank i am pretty sure i paid cash at the post office with a giro thing off the bottom of the bill. I could kick myself now for not keeping the receipt that they give you at the PO. I am really really fed up and bloody annoyed. What is my next step? This happened not too long after me originally paying this and i explained to the utility company that i had paid it and the woman on the phone said she would sort it out for me. As i never heard anything else I presume she had done just that. Now I have received this....... Is there a letter or anything else I can send to Advantis saying no this is not my debt!!!! I do not owe this...

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could write back:

'I do not acknowledge this debt. Final payment was made to xxxx in MM/YY. I suggest you refer it back to your client'

 

In the meantime, phone the utility & play stink - it may or may not get you anywhere. Without proof of payment you've got an uphill battle.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have now received a letter dated 10 Aug from Advantis again - address to myself in my maiden name and my husband - it woudl appear that they have totally ignored my other letters to them saying i do not acknowledge the debt and this is as if it is a new letter. They say they have been instructed by their client blah blah blah that I have 10 days to contact them from the date of the letter or failure to do this will result in further action being taken...... so do i send the prove it letter again.... then get copies of the bills again ...... then send the I do not acknowledge this debt letter........ again.... or do i ignore and wait and see what i get next??????

 

help please...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Advantis chasing old powergen / EON debt
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...