Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is what I have said in my email of complaint:   On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I have found myself in financial difficulty and I contacted you on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months and I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name.  I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this.  What I would like you to do is to please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP. If you fail to resolve my complaint within 8 weeks, or if matters are not settled to my satisfaction, I will have no alternative but to refer my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully, Should I send something along those lines to the CEO? 
    • Right... Misuse of Facility is a Cat 6 and is considered the worst out of all of the CIFAS Categories for CIFAS Markers.  However lets see what happens when MCB come back to you. Make sure you refer it to the CEO.    IF YOU DONT HAVE A VALID REASON FOR THE ISSUE WITH PAYMENTS ETC - Then the marker will stay.   
    • That "oh dear" doesn't sound good  
    • Oh dear.. Misuse of facility...  Cat 6... No wonder everything is being nuked from high orbit... More in a bit.. 
    • Thank you fkofilee First question: what do I do if Monzo close my account? I need an account but no one will touch me with this marker against me. Is there anywhere/any other option that I have if Monzo close my account? MCB is My Community Bank?  Yes What Category of Marker do you have? This is what it says on the Cifas SAR: Application date: 07 December 2023 Date recorded: 09 April 2024 Expiry date: 09 April 2030 Cifas Case Identifier: 15435315 Product relating to the application, proposal, account or facility: Personal Loan – Unsecured Facility: Granted Case type: Misuse of facility Reason(s) for filing: Evasion of payment Financial Loss Value of Loss: £5000.00 When did you raise the complaint? Last night via email Do you have Correspondence / Audit Trails of communications showing that you were in severe financial strain due to an event AFTER you took the loan? I can prove that I had to buy a new washing machine, I have my pay slips showing the emergency tax code and a letter from the tax office after I had spoken with them to get it corrected and of course I can get a copy of my vet bill. And all of this was in the first 2-3 months of 2024.  I panicked. Stupid I know and as you say, I have learned the hard way and I am not in any way denying anything that I have done wrong, but it just feels a bit unfair.  It is what it is I guess and if I have to have it on me forever then so be it. I am just so worried about the bank situation 😕    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Littlewoods refusing to do things in writing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5055 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband's debt with littlewoods hasn't yet been passed to a DCA, but littlewoods are phoning about 3 times a day. We've sent them a letter with an offer of token payment (£1) and asked them not to contact us by phone again, quoting section 40 etc.

 

They are still ringing and my husband told them that he'd equested that they do not phone, and do everything in writing, they acknowledged this but refuse to do everything in writing as apparently it will "incur more charges". :eek: WTF??

 

So shall we just ignore this and keep doing everything in writing anyway and if they carry on phoning, then threaten to take them to court for harrassment? As we refuse to do anything unless it's in writing as we intend to keep a record of everything.

If I have been helpful in any way, please tip my scales :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 212
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

do not speak to them on the phone EVER have you sent a request for a consumer credit agreement because if not do so straight away, littlewoods are notorious for not having a legal agreement and often cannot supply and therefore cannot enforce payment or judgement, if they do ring put the phone on the table and walk away or refuse to answer there stupid security questions, I normally tell em that the only security question I will answer is one that is not in the public domain such as what is my favorite colour or meal.. this usually confuses them enough to go away. good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to CCA them using letter N from here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

Also send them this letter:

 

- HARASSMENT WARNING -

WARNING; PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997;

WARNING; COMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003. s127.

 

Telephone Number: {Your Telephone Number}

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

Dear Sir/Madam.

 

I am writing in relation to telephone calls that I have received from your organisation, which I deem to be personally harassing. I have verbally requested that these calls stop, but I am still receiving call. I now require the telephone number listed above to be completely removed from your systems.

 

I am in the view that your continued telephone calls put you in breach of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997.

 

This is a private telephone line, operated on a contract with the intention of receiving and making personal phone calls, I have not authorised any other member of my family to receive calls from your organisation using this PRIVATE TELEPHONE LINE.

 

By using this telephone number without my permission you are interferring with my ability to use my own private property for the duration of any call.

 

It is my right to require that this telephone line, which is licenced solely to myself, is kept clear for my own personal calls.

 

It is consquently my view that you are commiting the tort of interference with contract insofar as for the duration of each call you make to me without my permission, you are interfering with my contractual right to receive and make personal calls on my private telephone line.

 

Continued interference with my contractual rights in this manner may result in legal action.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to the Office of Communications, Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you may be liable for a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that all telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Amend both to suit, send recorded, print your name do not sign it, keep copies of your letters with your postal reciept, use a £1 postal order for the fee for the CCA request and keep a copy of the serial number to check if it's been cashed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to do that all the time with Moorcroft & Westcot.

They would charge £12 (i think it was?) added on to the balance of the debt.

I would write back deducting £12 off the balance :p

 

Did it work?

If I have been helpful in any way, please tip my scales :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree for them to come and take back what are now second hand goods would not be worth their while, plus as previous poster states they would need a court order and bailiffs neither of which they can get without a signed cca which littlewoods never seem to be able to produce stop worrying

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband just got into a long conversation with them over the phone - basically about the phonecalls and asking for them to stop. They are saying that they didn't receive the letter asking them to stop the phonecalls, (quoting all the neccessary legal stuff) I know it's been signed for though.

 

They basically said that no matter what we ask them, that they will continue to phone, and she told him that they will not deal with the debt in any other way.

 

Can they do this?? They are lying about the letter being received, lying about being able to call whenever they want (5 times a day, sometimes at 7am) and legally can they insist that the debt only be dealt with over the phone?

 

My husband, who is not at all good on the phone, nearly caved and started talking about repayment options untill I shouted at him.

 

I'm thinking, they would say all of this bollocks to scare him wouldn't they?!

If I have been helpful in any way, please tip my scales :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

legally can they insist that the debt only be dealt with over the phone?

 

No they can't, they are frightened of leaving a paper trail. Report them to Trading Standards and the OFT.

 

In future please please do not talk to them on the 'phone. If they ring up just hang up on them. Remember they very nearly won and got what they wanted this time, next time you might not be so lucky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what I do if they ring up is say "one moment please" I put the phone on the table and walk away.... theyll soon realise its costing them a fortune to talk to "dead air" they normally give up ringing after a few times of doing this

and remember what the previous poster said report em to trading standards and the oft

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell em in writing that everytime they charge you for the phone call you will charge them for time you spend answering it, at the same rate they charge you

but seriously take no notice of them its all scare tactics to get you to part with money, they can add as much as they like to the bill, without a valid cca they have absolutely no chance of collecting it...

also make sure you send/or have sent the harassment by phone letter these people are in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and you need to report them to the Office of Communications, Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading, meaning that they may be liable for a substantial fine.

they cannot be allowed to treat you like this, if you have call id I wouldnt even answer the phone just let it ring... report them now..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everybody, I've made a complaint online to Ofcom and will also be putting it in writing. Also I'm now on the website for the OFT and it's directed me to 'consumer direct' is this the right one?

If I have been helpful in any way, please tip my scales :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They told my husband that they charge HIM for every phonecall they make to us!!

 

 

haha well if ever there was a clear incentive not to pick up the phone to them its that... if they charge to speak to you... dont talk to them:D:D:D:D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...