Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
    • I have notified all parties and will start a new thread.
    • The messaging app's boss has taken to social media to deny Mr Musk's claim it "exports user data."View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

me vs cabot can anyone advise me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3565 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Photobucket

 

 

Photobucket

 

 

 

Photobucket

 

 

I wondered when I would get my next bit of happy post from cabot and here it is. They never bothered to reply to my last 2 letters but I feel well let them take it to court and see once and for all. What i am wondering now is should I reply to the letter from Morgan or just wait and let it go to court?(i dont really want them to know what my defence will be i.e them agreeing to suspend adding interest then reaplying it without informing me so the debt was growing and growing in the 9 years I was paying.

 

Also I visited cab and they have suggested i should consider going bankrupt as it will take another 77 years for me to repay the shortful from the sale of the property(this would also solve the cabot dilema) If I did go to court and lose the case againts cabot and decided the only option to be would to go down that road would cabot still have a claim after I have been discharged? any thoughts or sugestions would be really appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Send them this;

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

I refer to your letter of XXXXX 2009 which was received today.

 

Frankly, I am surprised of the need to advise a firm of solicitors about the terms and conditions surrounding my Consumer Credit Agreement request (Consumer Credit Act, 1974); dated XXXX 2009 for which I have proof of receipt . I can only assume therefore that they failed to inform you of their non compliance. Your client had until (date - 12+2 working days from date of sending CCA request) to comply with a legal request.

 

Should your client persist with threats of legal action as stated in your letter, I will welcome the opportunity for a judge to look at several defaults committed by xxxx under The Consumer Credit Act, 1974, as well as your client’s non-compliance with and total disregard for, both the banking code and OFT guidelines.

 

Also please note that I will ONLY communicate in writing, any calls made to me will be classed as harrassment and treated as such.

 

Yours faithfully

Print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent letter C., stay strong Sticky, doubt they would want to go near court with this one anyway as I'm sure the court would take a dim view of their antics. Have you done the Subject Access Request as well, you need to get as much evidence of their behaviour as possible. That CAB advice is very negative and not helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply cerberusalert and miss muppet it is very much appreciated. Cabot have already supplied me with a copy of the cca be it later than the time frame so i will send the letter anyway. I havent done a SAR yet but will do so now. Do I send this to cabot or morgan?

 

One thing I forgot to mention in my first post was when this first came to light and i requested a full statement of account cabot took it upon themselves to reduce the interest rate then back date it from when they under cabot took it over so the statement looks like they have only ever charged the account at 5%, is this normal practice as i would have thought it would have to be shown as an adjustment as it is changing the account history?

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Sticky, only just got back to this, sure you will have worked this out for yourself by now, send the request to Cabot who can forward it to the original creditor which should make things nice and difficult for them - they have 40 days to comply and then you can make a complaint to ICO if they don't. They are not a lot of use but if it goes to court, it shows that you have gone down all the necessary avenues. Good luck, keep us posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Have sent a SAR about 2 weeks ago and this was acknowledged by cabot so the clock is ticking on this one. In the meantime i have applied to eqifax to view my credit record and was surprised that there is no mention of cabot on it or even the original lender? my question is would all credit agencys have the same information or is it best to apply to all of them i.e experian?

 

I must add this site is amazing and a credit to all the ppl who keep it running :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey cerberusalert that was a quick reply dont know about the AA but u must be the 1st emergency service lol. Thanks 4 that i appreciate it, nice to know my new friend crapot are not putting nasty things about me on a disputed account. Wow maybe they are playing fair and we have got em all wrong???? Not!!!! lol

Thanks again:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have recieved a big parcel in response to my SAR request and am going through it slowly. What I have noticed so far is that there is no copies of assingment notices and no default notices, should they have given copies of these under the SAR request? The big thing that I have noticed is they have sent me a statement of account from morley which clearly shows that interest was not being applied to the account and another one from themselves which contradicts this and shows interest being applied. Where should I go from here without giving the buggers to much info on the cards I hold?

ooooo another thing they have also sent me documents relating to 2 other acounts they hold on other people, very sloppy of them i think prehaps I should try and trace these peoiple and tell then how I got hold of their infomation lol:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ooooo another thing they have also sent me documents relating to 2 other acounts they hold on other people, very sloppy of them i think prehaps I should try and trace these peoiple and tell then how I got hold of their infomation lol

Oh dear oh dear another one for the ICO to get their teeth into https://www.ico.gov.uk/Global/contact_us.aspx

 

Make a complaint to the ICO & try & contact the other people to get them to do the same. Also invite them here to join the party. :D

 

Then sit back & wait for the brown stuff to hit the fan. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cerberusalert and Rhia thanks for the reply. Yes I will report this to the ICO.:D I have gone through everything in the sar and there are no default notices(thats because i always paid what was agreed with morley and cabot) and also no copies of notice of assingment so I am about to write to them and point this out and request they send them. I have put copies of statements they sent me on to this post which clearly shows what I have said all along that the figures dont add up i.e balance of sale on sar1 and statement on sar4 any pointers or comments will be most appreciated:)

 

 

sar01

 

sar02

 

sar03

 

sar04

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I might have got this muddled but looking just at the docs (haven't gone back over the thread) Cabot or Morley or whatever they call themselves are adding interest up to present date but you last made payment in 01. Is this correct? If this is so the debt is statute barred so always make sure you state you do not acknowledge it.

They have a few problems too in that Cabot and Morley are the same company so they sold you a loan/mortgage to repay the laon to themselves and this starts getting into the realms of Unfair terms etc.

Sorry I am a bit rushed but if you could clarify this it would help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rhia

sorry if i confused you. I stopped paying this account in december last year as i believed i had payed the account of in full. Morley accepted reduced payments in 1998 of £5 a month with no interest being added this was increased to £30 a month at a later stage also with no intersest being charged. Cabot took the account over in july 2006 under the same agreement with a view to reviewing it every year which they never did so i just carried on paying.

 

The link in sar2 shows the last payment under morley 06/08/01 balance £3130.91.

In link on sar3 (which is cabot statement) the balance for the same date shows £5093.29

 

Also in link sar1(cabot sar reply) it says they brought the account on 11th july 2006 with a balance at sale £3130.91 yet on their statement (sar4) it shows a balance of £6289.93 on the same date.

 

Hope this has made it a bit clearer. I haven`t pointed this out to cabot as i would rather a judge see this as it and not let the cabot maggots try and wriggle out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I see where you're coming from. I couldn't read the "agreement" properly so if there's any way of bumping this up I think you'll get more response.

 

They have quite a lot of explaining to do as to how such a debt could literally double overnight.

 

I suspect there are a number of angles we can look at here and I still think we may get back to the agreement between Cabot and Morely who are just another one of their companies under the Cabot umbrella as a search of Companies House will reveal.

I suggest you take a look at the OFT's guidelines on Fair Practice (on their website). Getting debtors to take out a secured loan to pay off a loan is a huge no no. Add to this the fact that Cabot and Morely are brother and sister and I think you have a case.

Have you presented this to Trading Standards? I would give it a shot but be prepared to keep pushing them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

cabot080709.jpg

 

I sent cabot the above letter on the 8th July which royal mail confirms was signed for on the 9th July but i havent heard a dicky bird in way of a reply from them. Should I follow it up with a reminder or just wait for their next move? I cant stand it when they go quiet lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhh! It's the silences that are the most challenging. You feel you need to do something. However, as it is now a month and you have had no reply write to them and simply say.

 

I refer to my letter dated XXX which, according to Royal Mail records was delivered safely to your offices on XXX. As of today I have not had the courtesy of a reply and I wish to make an official complaint about your lack of response.

 

I attach the original letter for reference. If you fail to reply within 14 days I will report this matter to Trading Standards and the OFT. Send it signed for.

 

See if that flushes out the rabbit from its hole.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

cabot211009.jpg

 

 

Have had this reply back from cabot. Before I fire back a reply can anyone advise me if what they say is true regarding the Assignment? As Nationwide Credit corp. was the original lender and not morley I should imagine they still need to supply one.

 

Not sure what agreement they are talking about but the original one was for 300 monthly payments from 1988 which dosent make it expired yet should I send them an Abacus with my reply:D

Edited by sticky29
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...