Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
    • you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok.   dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hugh's CCA to Marbles


Hugh Jeffort
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4061 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi All,

 

Haven't been on for ages so thought i'd leave an update, not that there is anything to add.............still get calls almost everyday and when I answer (Usually only one a day) the line goes dead! Have received a letter again from Anne Gartshore where she has now told me what I received was definetley an acceptable CCA, and that they dont have to provide my signature on it (which they did), still no ref to missing T&C's or of passing on to another lender while in dispute!!

 

I'll just wait some more I think.....

 

Hope everyone else is well.

 

Hugh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hugh , thanks for the update :)

 

Might be an idea to check on your credit rating , just to make sure they haven't defaulted you ......... if they have you should let the CRA know that this account is 'In Dispute' ....... they should then take it up with the bank ....

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Johnny, i'll do just that, they have issued me with a default but I haven't heard anything since, I was going to look on experian, should I look at all the CRA's?

Also, i've been a bit slow to be honest and have chose to sit and wait rather than report anything to any bodies, I think its been long enough and i've sent enough friendly letters. Problem is, although through reading other threads I know I should complain to the OFT, and trading standards, is there anyone else, and how much info should I be passing on?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are three main credit reference agencies compiling info on us; Equifax, Experian and Callcredit.

 

I think HSBC use Experian, but might be as well to check the other two , just in case ....

 

As for the other matter ..... I'd be inclined to report them to the Information Commissioner for non- compliance .... I think FOS are reluctant to get involved with CCAs .....

 

Information Commissioner's Office - ICO

 

https://www.ico.gov.uk/Global/contact_us.aspx

 

You can speak to the ICO on the phone first and they'll advise you how to proceed ......... then you can tell Anne Gartshore that you have reported it , 'in case she wishes to re think about complying with the Data Protection Act ....... " :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hugh,

I'm afraid that you are going to have to put up with having an adverse credit rating as it is all geared their way,no matter what the law says.

If you are willing to put up with this, and to be honest, the only way to avoid it is to give in to them and pay up, then start treating it as a game and don't let the ba***rds wear you down.

When they phone, don't answer their security questions and they then can't continue with the call.

It is my belief that they haven't got the correct cca, so satisfy yourself that for all their threats and bluster, they will not be able to do anything about it and will eventually try and chase up less informed folk.

If by some miracle, they come up with a correct agreement, which they wont, there are plenty of people on this great forum that will help you prepare a defence.

Good luck mate.

Pat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hugh ,

 

I would have to disagree slightly with Pat there (sorry Pat:))....... whilst it is very difficult to have a default record /adverse credit rating removed , it is not impossible , especially if you can prove that you wouldn't have had one if the bank had played by the rules ...

 

The rest of Pat's advice holds good ..... you've got to get them to admit they can't produce the CCA you're looking for ..... :)

 

 

There are one or two links on this , but I think you need to first check if you actually have been defaulted by checking with the CRA(s). If you haven't , it's academic at this stage ...... if you have come back and we'll try to help you further .......... :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi again,

 

Right, signed up to Experian and it shows that Marbles have marked down late payments for the last 6 months, no sign of a default yet, even though they threatened it the other month! Question is should I be contesting the late payment marks as while in dispute i'm not at liberty to offer any payment. I looked at the experian help for inaccurate info and they say contact your lender, no mention of any notes to the account!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Hugh, yes you should be telling Marbles that they a'rnt allowed to process your information while the account is in dispute.

 

You can try writing to the CRA's but they wont remove any adverse comments without the bank telling them to :cool:. When I wrote to them I only had a response from Experian who did put an marker on my file saying the information was disputed and contacted the bank too.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Pete, I'll draft something up and send to the CRA's too, wont hurt although i'm sure your right and they'll just ignore them.

Just out of curiosity, Marbles have insinuated that they may accept a reduced amount to settle the account! What would be a suitable F&F for £2200 debt, actually more like £2800 now with the charges and interest since I stopped paying.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received another letter from Marbles the other day...............

 

MarblesDefaultreminder.jpg

 

I have written Matthew Ball about 8 times as well as countless letters to Anne Gartstone and have not even been acknowledged.

 

Has anyone any ideas how to proceed next? Is this yet another threatening letter or should I be returning the cards?

 

Thanks guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you reported them to ICO yet hugh ? if not it may be time to do so , and tell Marbles you've done it ... that the account is in dispute and they can't close it, default you or take any action against you until they have produced the CCA .

 

The alternative is to wait and see if they follow through with the Default (they left it a long time since August :rolleyes:) and if they do take them to court to have it removed .

 

Leave them in no doubt that you will take legal action to protect your Credit Rating . Or you could invite them to take legal action against you so you could have your day in court at their expense ....I can't see them going down that road if they can't produce the CCA.

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may also be of interest Hugh , should you wish to quote the relevent part to them ...... (the bold font is mine ) :

Should no original agreement be in existence it is very hard to say that the copy the creditor offers to the debtor is, in fact, a true copy as there would be no original with which to compare it. In our view the onus of proof would be on the creditor to show that the copy is a true one and where none existed he may have difficulty discharging this. Neither should creditors suggest that a consumer has signed a credit agreement where they are unable to provide evidence to support this — to do so is likely to be a misleading action under Regulation 5 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (the CPRs) and would also constitute an unfair or improper business practice.”

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

To be honest I have sat on this for a bit now as i've been having developments in my MBNA fight which is not going too well.

 

Is there any chance one or two of you could take a look and give your opinion on my next course of action?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/182506-hughs-mbna-cca.html

 

I appreciate any help or guidance, I thought I wasn't doing too well at the Marbles claim now this is biting my arse!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have an update today, received a letter from 1st credit in Reigate requesting the full balance............will scan tonight at work and get it posted asap, it is just a normal 'Our client has instructed us to reclaim the above debt...........blah blah blah'

 

Interestingly the name of the debtor is HFC?????

Have HBOS passed it back and actually acted on one of my letters?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there you go hugh ... try this 1st Credit with this one : (suitably amended . )

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

Account number: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to yourselves, as it is in dispute with the **original/DCA** and has been since [DATE] . Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

As **original/DCA** are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, OFT Collection Guidelines, Subject Access request and have also breached s10 Data Protection Act request , I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the **original/DCA** for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as **New DCA** cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

If **New DCA** chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines

Also be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

Yours faithfully

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hugh!

 

Following with great interest - keep up the good work!

 

I'm about to take on these clowns as they've pushed me to the edge of sanity - they ignore written correspondence and dmp agreements, add interest when it suits them and are slippery as eels. I'm about to CCA and SAR them - not what I wanted to be doing over the Christmas break, but I'm so incensed I have to put pen to paper.

 

Thank you for your informative and helpful thread.

 

ftc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

No probs FTC, hope you had a good christmas anyway and didnt let these clowns get to you!

 

I'm just awaiting the next letter to drop on the mat, hopefully from 1st credit to say they are passing the info back!

 

The one thing that worries me is after all this stalling by them gives them ample time to forge an enforceable agreement. I know it seems defeatest but MBNA sent an application completely void of any of the prescribed terms then 10 months later sent a 'back side' to the application which low and behold had all the terms!! Im sure they wont have an original to produce in court but, after reading some other threads, judgements have been made on the strength of copies!

 

We will just have to wait and see......................Good luck to everyone in 2010, the end of 2009 has produced a few knocks for us (test case etc), lets start 2010 fighting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all, finally time for an update...............

Heard back from 1st credit two weeks ago, informing me they are passing my info back.......................

Yesterday I got a letter from Marbles again saying they will look into my complaint???????????

(After months of denial and a default, and closing the account)

Today I receive what they class as my credit card agreement, which consists of the signed application form and the terms and conditions on pages 2 to 4, as far as I can tell it has all the required info but I cant help being suspicious!!

I will scan and post tonight.

Any help will be appreciated on what to do next!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its the same as my application form but Marbles were un-able to send me pages 2,3,4 of the T&Cs which made it un- Enforceable

As there is a direct link from the signed application to the T&Cs i believe it makes this enforceable..

 

Thats got me wondering now why they couldnt send me the T&Cs :confused:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...