Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • a CCJ does not 'expire' thus does not need any application to a court to 'extend it'. if a CCJ has not been enforced within 6yrs, then it is very unlikely any court would grant such should the claimant return to court, of which the defendant would be advised -( unless they have moved and not informed the court & the claimant such) .  
    • I contacted them when it happened. The caretaker came over, looked at it, and walked off with the tree chunks of mortar. Next morning, they had a roofer come over and enter our garden to inspect it. Friday they were supposed to speak with a scaffolding company. I had to bring up liability and potentially calling the council to report 'an unsafe structure' before they even got moving. They know all about the wedding, the preparations, our patio contractors etc. but their attitude doesn't instill me with confidence. My fear is it will end up being a legal matter which is why I posted here to hopefully receive some advice. As far as I can see, the roof is in a state of disrepair, even if it's just the mortar breaking lose due to the size and weight of the chunks - and even from ground level it's visibly clear that multiple pieces have fallen over time (though never this size so we haven't been able to identify the issue till now - we thought it was rubble left in the garden by the previous owner). Currently, we can't use 25% of our garden due to the risk of more falling mortar which is more than just an inconvenience, we can't proceed with our contractors, and at worst, it will run up in several thousand of extra expenses for us, if we have to find a wedding venue. Even if they do have it fixed in time, and we have to settle for renting a marquee and floor for the marquee and furniture and whatnot it will be additional costs only due to the neighbour's roof.
    • please create your OWN topic by hitting create or + in the top red banner  
    • It will be years before Banks would sell to a debt buyer.  Sometimes Banks will use external debt collectors to try to collect, but generally Banks don't take Court action.  So you could be looking at 3 to 6 years, before any dca owning debt looks to take any Court action. And it is not definite that this would happen. So no need to feel pressured at this stage. In the event you found yourself unemployed, you have time to engage with Banks to advise of your situation and ask for time to deal with the situation, find new employment. As long as you inform the Banks they will offer assistance they can. E.g offer payment holiday or accept reduced payment for period. What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. 
    • I'd get back to them tomorrow, and explain the circumstances, that you have a wedding reception, and just appeal to their better nature. Hopefully they will be able to move sooner rather than later, especially if you go in in person and speak to them, and show them the issue.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Creation Consumer Finance claimform - old Fridge loan - struck out - they tried again - **WON+COSTS TWICE**


intree
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4428 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ah- you didnt say where you were, I assumed from the question that you were in Norn Irn.

 

When you get costs judgement, contact the EJO in Belfast and ask them how you go about enforcing this English judgement in Northern Ireland.

 

6th Floor Bedford House

16-22 Bedford Street

Belfast

BT2 7FD

Phone: 028 9024 5081

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 472
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Update :

 

Went to the costs assement Hearing, to our surprise Creation consumer sent a solicitor along in the hope we would not attend,

 

The judge went through the motions and informed us that we could not claim for today, however, after hearing the waffle and excuses from the solicitor, she started shouting quite abrubtly at the solicitor, she advised them she has read the file and that she was disgusted that they did not settle before it came to this hearing, he blamed greenhalgs solicitors (apparently Creation consumer have appointed these new solicitors to sue Greenhalghs who lost this claim)................we were awared the costs, after a further lenghthy discussion between the judge and their solicitor, to my shock he was trying to dispute what we were claiming, I THEN, put forward the N254 Application and informed the judge that they had 21 days to respond and the hearing was not a appeal hearing.

 

The judge then told the solicitor, they had their chance and they messed up the claim, (I was quite annoyed at this stage) she then told him, she was not going to hear anymore from him, and awarded us the full amount, she then also went through what we claimed for today (originaly she refused to award anything for today) then awarded us £48.00 for attendance and travel etc.

 

They have 14 Days to pay, so I asked the judge to confirm that if they pursued with another claim, she looked at their solicitor and informed him that it would be abuse of process.

 

As soon as the money comes through I will definately make a contribution to the site as this site has now given me the insight and assistance, without which I would have faced a unfair claim and a CCJ.

 

Thanks to everyone on here who has helped and I wish the site assists many many individuals who are not able to help themselves.

 

THANK YOU ALL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent! Nice to have had their solicitor ripped to shreds in front of your eyes! :D

 

So, is £48 the total awarded?

 

Like I said, contact the EJO in Belfast and ask how you go about getting this transfered over to N.Ireland.

 

Then after 14 days (if they havent coughed up) issue enforcement proceedings against Creation.

Edited by noomill060
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Noomill

 

The total awarded was £633 including the 48.00, This site is the best site for genuine help needed and the people on here are wonderful as without you all I would have not dont it or had the courage or knowledge to deal with these prats - just look at their web site Debt Recovery and Commercial Litigation from Greenhalghs Solicitors, they are now being sued so what goes round comes round - is KARMA not a wonderful natural JUSTICE.

 

There are 100's of people who buy from stores on buy now pay later, you send them the money and then they say they did not receive it only to charge you 40% interest, so if you owed 1000 you end up with a CCJ and owing 2500 like us, how can they do this to people-why are they allowed to chase people for these unfair debts and get away with it just because you do not have a SLIMY SOLICITORS FIRM, who will even sell their own mother to get some money.

 

Life is hard and living is made even worse and unfair through the practices of these companies.Hopefully, the more people are assisted through this site, and helped to understand what they are facing, the less these claims will succeed, I hail the founders of this site and wish them good Karma as they are the real providers of JUSTICE to the poor and those who have nothing but their humility and honour to lose if not assisted.

 

WHAT GOES ROUND COMES ROUND IN THE END!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that supasnooper............Please can I remove the Link to greenhalghs as I dont want to promote these idiots, I attached it as previously they were using vultures and bears as their promotional adverts, claiming to act like vultures to collect debts and bears to fight so called bad credit.........................since they went on TV and were disclosed as real vultures on panorama they have changed their coats but not their method...........see here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/167052-attention-panorama-bbc1-20-a.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Inntree just to let you know that I also had a claim where I won (my costs were measly though) and as soon as I received the judgment I sent it recorded delivery to Greenhalghs just to make sure they wouldn't say "oh we didnt receive one". They then wrote saying we have asked our client for the money"

 

They are horrible I had a really bad do with them - lying stands to mind.

 

Anyhow I look at that letter from them now and think "your client wouldn't have been best pleased with you lot".

 

Congrats btw its good that this shower are brought down once again.

 

HH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that supasnooper............Please can I remove the Link to greenhalghs as I dont want to promote these idiots, I attached it as previously they were using vultures and bears as their promotional adverts, claiming to act like vultures to collect debts and bears to fight so called bad credit.........................since they went on TV and were disclosed as real vultures on panorama they have changed their coats but not their method...........see here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/167052-attention-panorama-bbc1-20-a.html

 

 

It's your call as it is your post.

 

Personally, I'd edit your post leaving in the references to Greenhalghs in your post for anyone who searches the forum but remove the weblink.

I'm sure people will do a web search anyway. ;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

Just a update, we received the order of above dated 24 November 2009, for the amount of 633 to be paid within 14 days, which was latest 8 december 2009, however the order was typed up on 16/01/10 so do I now enforce through the baliffs or do I wait until it is 14 days from it being typed, as I am not sure these cretins will pay anything despite the order, as their solicitor attended on the 24th November so must have advised them to pay.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the order is dated 24 November, you can now go ahead and enforce it without mercy.

 

My judgement against a credit card company was dated 20 March, but didnt receive it until a month later. I was able to enforce it starught away.

 

They whinged and cried over it and phoned the court to confirm their bad news, but they paid up to avoid bailiffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to the idiots via e-mail last night giving them 3 days to respond before issuing High court action - this is the response I received

 

What a Bunch of W$%£%£RS

 

We have not received a copy of the sealed order made by the court at the hearing on 24.11.09. However we do have a record of the hearing from our representative, we now enclose the cheque for the settlement.

 

Notwithstanding that these proceedings have been struck out, there still remains the issue of monies owed by you to our client under the finance agreement. We have asked our client for their instructions in this regard and as soon as they have been confirmed we shall write to you further.

 

W£$%$RS

 

OUR RESPONSE AS FOLLOWS:

 

I refer to the contents of your letter, this account is now struck out by order of the court and costs assessed and awarded against your client, moreover the account has been unlawfully terminated by your clients and accepted as such by me, any further attempt to re-litigate will be defended vigorously and reported to the Court.

Please note that any issuance of a claim for the matter which has already been struck out will be considered an abuse of process, the representative who attended Court from your Clients was warned of this fact by District Judge XXXXXX, accordingly, any further action which you client or you do pursue will be highlighted to the Court and a counter claim for damages will be issued. We believe your Clients instructed the new representative, from different solicitors, who attended Court.

This matter is now closed and all further correspondence in this matter is now closed, any further contact made by you or your clients will be considered as Harassment and action will be taken to remedy this.

As you are supposed to be acting in the interests of your clients, it would be advisable to give them the appropriate advice in light of the above comments and the Court orders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have written today to again confirm that we owe money on the agreement, they are requesting repayment proposals, they also have stated as there was no formal decision on the account, they will re-issue the claim, they do not consider this as abuse of process.

 

they will be writing back to confirm in the near future via court ---- CAN THEY DO THIS - DEFECTIVE DN ON WHICH ACC WAS TERMINATED - THEN FAILED TO FOLLOW COURT ORDERS - STRUCK OUT AND COSTS AWARDED TO US FOR THEIE BEHAVIOUR - NOW THIS THREAT

 

ALL HELP AAPRECIATED

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Vjohn yes they paid up, after advice from the CAG, was to write to the solicitors and give them 3 days to pay up or send in the enforcement through the High Court, they are now adamant that, their client is going to have the claim relisted for another hearing and they are waiting for instructions.

 

They are a joke, and been told so, I have also informed them, that their actions and threat are and will be considered as abuse of process and res judicata, I made a donation to CAG for all the excellent help too.

 

I could never had fought this alone without this website and the many good people who afford genuine and honest advice to the end.

 

THANK YOU ALL

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...