Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Any update here? MET started a court case recently against a Cagger concerning this very site and EV charging - and then bottled it and discontinued the case before the hearing. It would be useful for others to know what happened in your case.
    • The important thing to know is that MET - although they will send you threat after threat about how they will divert a drone from Ukraine and make it fall on your home - hardly ever do court. Even in the very small number of cases where they send court papers, if the Cagger defends, they drop the matter before the hearing.  They have no real intention of putting their rubbish claim before a judge.  The aim is to find motorists who are terrified of the idea of going to court and who will give in when the court papers arrive. Thanks for doing the sticky and well done on finding F18's thread.  Do what they did.  On the first page - I think post 19 - there is the address of the CEO of BP.  Write to them, lay it on thick about being genuine customers in the various premises, mention the small kids, the very short stay time, attach any proof of purchase - and request that they get the invoice cancelled.
    • Thank you for that, I have obviously already been convicted so I think the appeal lodged is for the previous offence? Sorry if that doesn’t make sense. I suppose my only concern is that weds I go there and they don’t let a stat dec happen. If they do then as you say and solicitor says it’s highly likely I’ll be happy with the outcome. But I’m being told there’s no guarantee for the stat dec to be hard Weds as that’s not what the hearing is proposed for. Solicitor has stated that you can put a stat dec before a magistrates at any time so it shouldn’t be a problem.   
    • I re-read the extract from your  solicitor's letter this morning and think I might understand what they have in mind. I believe (and it’s only a guess) their strategy is this: 1.    You will make your SD 2.    You will enter fresh pleas to the four charges (not guilty) but will offer to plead guilty to speeding on the understanding that the FtP charges are dropped. 3.    If this is accepted they will attempt to argue that the two offences were committed “on the same occasion” 4.    You will be sentenced for those two offences (the sentence depending on whether the “same occasion” argument succeeds). They also have a plan in the event that your offer at (2) is unsuccessful and you are convicted again of the 2xFtP charges (and so face disqualification under “totting up”): 5.    They will make an “exceptional hardship” argument to avoid a ban. 6.    If that is unsuccessful they have already lodged an appeal in the Crown Court against that decision. (This is the only “appeal” I can think of). 7.    They plan to ask the court to suspend your ban pending that appeal. If I’m correct, I’m surprised the Crown Court has agreed to accept a speculative appeal (against something that hasn’t happened). The solicitor says this is to lodge it within the normal timescales. But you will have 21 days from the date of your conviction (which will be next Wednesday) to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court, so there is no need for a speculative appeal. I have to say that an application to have your ban suspended pending an appeal is unlikely to succeed. The Magistrates Court is unlikely to agree to it for one very good reason: if they make such an order (suspending your ban until your appeal is heard), all you need to do is not to pursue the appeal and the Magistrates order suspending your ban will remain in place. Hey Presto! No ban and no need for you to trouble with an appeal. Perhaps he will ask for your ban to be suspended for (say) three months or until your appeal is heard (whichever occurs first). This potentially creates a problem because if your appeal is not heard in that time either your ban will kick in or you will have o go back to court to get the suspension extended. But the solicitor obviously knows more about these things than I do. I would want to be very clear about this solicitor’s fees and what he proposes to charge you for. As I said, there is absolutely no need to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court. That can be done if and when it becomes required. But I am still firmly of the opinion that it is overwhelmingly likely that you will not need to progress beyond point 2 above. Point 3 is optional and I don’t know whether he solicitor has made It clear to you that the only thing you will avoid in the event of success is three penalty points. You will still be fined for the second offence and your driving record will still be endorsed with the details, but no penalty points will be imposed. Do let us know how it goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Elgrand vs MBNA


Elgrand
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4440 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Just got another SAR back from MBNA and comms list shows that the account was sold to Experto Credite on the 15 Sep 2009 Remedy 24thSep

Couple of things not sure of and would appreciate some answers/comments

 

Before the log shows the account sold, it has the following comms.

 

29/08/09 RMU recall DDA changed to 000

31/08/09 Autoch charge off code a

31/08/09 MBNA acct b61stat chgd from b to o

09/09/09 NOD sent 7/9/9 expires 24/9/9 £total, £arrears. There was no arrears mentioned on the default

 

After the log shows the account sold, it states chqs bank accounts from and to. I guess this is where they have had transactions with Experto ?

 

On their transactions pages, it has

 

14/08/09 CAO fee refund. Don't know what that is

31/08/09 charge off adjustment -£outstanding old account number

31/08/09 charge off adjustment +£outstanding new account number

16/09/09 Zero curbl on sold account -£oustanding old account number

 

Not really sure what all that means but hope someone can explain.

 

Elg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Elgrand, try and track down, supasnooper or IveGotNoMoney, they might be able to help you decipher those. Other than that, you will have to refer back to MBNA. They are obliged to provide you with the information.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi RobboM,

 

I have had a couple of letters from Experto.

 

One telling me that I owe them £0000

And one apologising for giving me the wrong account number and please pay us £0000

 

I have ignored them for now and have not heard anything for quite a long time.

 

Thanks Elg.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi,

 

Recently had a claim form come through from Northampton county court.

 

I have sent a cpr 31.14 request to the name and address of the Sols on the claim form for the docs listed in the poc and have given 7 days to comply.

7 days up, so I have phoned the solicitor with the intention of asking when they are likely to comply and requesting more time to file a defence.

 

Question I have now, is that the number provided on the claim form is that of a dca and not the sol's and they are stating that I need to contact them not the sols?? regarding docs.

 

Can someone kindly clarify if this is right.

 

I do not want to run out of time and lose this by default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is a solicitors name and address for service mentioned on the claim form, then that is who you need to contact.

 

Who are the solicitors and the DCA ?

 

If you had sent your CPR31.14 to the solicitor then they were obliged to pass that request on if they arent dealing with it.

 

I advise you to send a pm to andyorch and ask him to pop in and advise you. You could also try DonkeyB.. he might know :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cB

 

Thanks for the quick response.

 

I am holding back from saying who the sols and dca are for the moment as I am awaiting a call back from the dca and want to here what they have to say first.

 

My understanding was the same. The sols name and address on the claim form is where I sent my letter and who I believe I should be dealing with. I have confirmation that they received my request and I now have their number. I will call them a little later and see what they have to say as well.

 

Thanks for the advice about the pm's.

 

I will update later

 

Elg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checking cB

 

The sols name and address is in the box where they say.

Address for sending documents and payments and that is where I sent my CPR request, not the claimant is that correct.??

It is signed by the Solicitor in the claimant's solicitor box.

Elg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Elgrand

 

I will have to come back to you later with regards to this. All requests and communication should be through the Solicitor handling the claim on behalf of their Client.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

After waiting nearly 4 hours for a response from the dca with no joy, I decided to phone them and here's what they have to say.

 

They do not have to send me the docs because I have not sent them a pound with my request??

 

So this is my situation.

 

Received a Last letter before legal proceedings from IND

I responded to that letter, and the response was ignored

 

Received a claim from Northampton.

Claimant (Varde)

Sols (Hegarty)

Done a AOS online defending all the claim

 

Sent a cpr 31.14 letter to Hegarty who are the solicitors acting for the claimant (Varde) and who have signed the claim form

 

7 days over.

 

Called who I believed to be Hegarty as this number was attached to their address on the claim form with the intention of speaking to them and asking when they are likely to comply.

IND answered the phone claiming all correspondance was to go through them. I questioned that, asked a few more questions and was told they would get back to me.

 

In between I got the number for Hegarty, called them and was rudely told to contact IND. The lady who answered the phone flatly refused to let me speak to anyone else and eventually put the phone down on me.

 

4 hours later I have called IND to be told, they have my letter addressed to Hegarty and I need to send them a pound. I asked who it was that had made that decision and was told it was their legal department as they beleive my request to be a section 78.

 

Elg

Link to post
Share on other sites

God help us if we get to trial they don't know the difference between a CPR and a section 77/78:madgrin:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi miss muppet.

Thank you.

 

It was very frustrating not being able to speak to the dca legal department and questioning them as to why they beleived that this was a cca request? At least this confirmed that the sols had passed on the letter and they cannot deny they had it.

 

Just got a couple of things to add and ask.

 

Claim issued on the 02nd/08

deemed service 07th

aos (online) received 10th

 

CPR request sent 10th signed for on 11th

 

So I have 28 days from day of service leaving my deadline 03/09 to put in my defence.

 

Do you think the best course of action now is to write to them attaching the original request and pointing out they are obliged to comply, given them a three day deadline.

 

And if no compliance file an N244 for a strike out or unless order.

 

I have the situation that the sols will not speak to me and it has the dca number on the claim form, so would it be best to send correspondance to both the sols and dca.

 

Or have I left it too late and go straight for the N244?

 

Donkey.

I do record the calls using the trucall system and I asked the sols secretary if they recorded their calls as I would be using it as evidence and she said, I don't think so.

 

Thanks

 

Elg.

Edited by Elgrand
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Elgrand, refer to posts 131 & 139, it is the solicitors who have brought the claim so stop trying to communicate with the DCA, the way they are behaving is all the grist to the mill for you and will show them up in court - with regard to the strike out, you could do this but personally I wouldn't be spending my hard earned cash, let them continue and tie themselves up in knots!

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I forgot to add to the previous post is that its much too early to be thinking about a strike out, you haven't even got your defence in yet or received theirs. Please have a look at some of the MBNA threads regarding court action, I used Staying Calm's thread when putting together my defence, you need to be reading up as much as you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi miss muppet

 

Thanks for your help, I believe I have found the thread you mentioned

 

I am starting to get a bit anxious now.

 

I have been following the thread Important if your being sued and have tried to put into practice some of the advice that has been given.

I have sent the cpr 31.14 and have been ignored by the sols.

I don't believe that another letter will get them communicating with me, but I guess I need to send it anyway, so I can add to the non compliance.

As for the N244 I don't believe I have any other way of getting an extension of time to file my defense, which I will need as they have not supplied me with the docs listed in the poc's and I have always disputed with the oc the oustanding amount they claim I owe, so I also need to know how they have come to that calculation.

 

I am not completley sure of the deadline I have to put in my defense, so I think it would be a good idea to call the court and ask.

 

hopefully I am on the right track, but If I'm not, I really would appreciate some more advice.

 

Elg.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can make application to force the CPR15.5 but at a cost £45.This is because the claimant is not willing to comply or confirm in writing.

This in it self is a great error on the part of the claimant and will be seen as frustratiing matters and not complying with the CPR and PDs.Within the application you would also request disclosure and steer the DJ to making an " Unless" order which in essence will be a strike out of his own accord.

Just something to consider Elgrand.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

I was just going to write something in reply, when the post dropped through my letterbox and in it was a letter from IND not the Sols.

I will post it up soon and the copy of the application form they also sent.

 

Elg.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...