Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Anyone else sick of speed ramps and traffic calming?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5564 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I live in a borough where there seems to be an obsession by council to put road humps, sleeping policemen, or traffic calming devices on every single road they can find. We have a main road nearby which is about a quarter of a mile long, you couldn't speed down anyway as it's generally always busy, but this road, being almost the last in the borough untouched by these vandals and control freaks have just begun putting those tarmac squares across the road.

 

My car has firm suspension admittedly, but every time I venture over one of these things my back tenses up as I pray it doesn't send another shudder through my body.

 

Why oh why can't these control freaks allow people to use their common sense to drive without dictating every last twist and turn we make on the steering wheel.

 

For those less fit than me, these humps must be a nightmare, anyone with back issues must dread them and ambulances carrying patients to hospitals especially when they may have neck or back injured patients aboard must curse their very existence like I do.

 

I think it was our Boris who said Councils must find other ways of traffic calming than these things, but councils, rather than putting the tarmac to its proper use and filling the thousands of holes in the roads, use it to fit even more of these wretched things.

 

How do we stop this reckless spending of council tax or road tax (wherever the money comes from)?

 

I hate them with a passion!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do we stop this reckless spending of council tax or road tax (wherever the money comes from)?

 

by educating people not to speed.

shows total disregard for other road users and alike.

 

if people didn't speed, there would be no need for them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

where i live they have humps that dont go right across the road and they are useless and serve no purpose at all drivers still speed

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do we stop this reckless spending of council tax or road tax (wherever the money comes from)?

 

by educating people not to speed.

shows total disregard for other road users and alike.

 

if people didn't speed, there would be no need for them.

 

dx

 

I've been driving for 40 yrs so I guess I'm a little more disciplined myself now, but I tend to be more attentive to a board which flashes up a '30' in lights if anyone happens to be exceeding that than I do to those humps.

 

I fully understand the fact that there are roads which need controls, no question about it, but the configeration of some of these things makes me naturally go into a dangerous road position.

 

For example; a fairly wide b road, residential, enough space for large vehicles to pass one another in either direction. 3 'square humps placed across the complete width of the road, it is natural to line the car up with wheels catching the edges of the hump so that the central highest point is square under the engine, that theoretically provides the least friction through the car as I drive over it. IF I find cars parked near to them then to obtain the least friction of going over the highest point of the hump with my wheel I opt for the next hump beside it which is placed half on one side of the road and half on the other slap bang center of the complete width of the road. To centre the car up means I have to pull the car over onto the wrong side of the road when often I have to judge the distance of the oncoming car hoping I can get across centrally before he arrives. It doesn't make any sense to make a driver take the next best option to being shaken to bits by using the 2nd hump and it could cause an accident.

 

Now I appreciate one might argue if I drove slower I could just go over the first hump slower as they are designed to do, but I do not drive fast anyway. There is also invariably another car right up my rear hurrying me along and on my bumper so not only am I being distracted by the damned humps I am thinking about the car behind too and missing the oncoming cars.

 

Another thing is that as there are so many of these humps these days, the minute I do get onto an open stretch of road it's almost an invitation to go back to driving properly and relax with even more speed.

 

There must be other ways than this to regulate flows and to spend far less money on trying to control everything in this life we do.

 

I understand many people reading this will know of someone who may have been injured by speeding cars, but my sister was knocked off her bike by a guy on his mobile phone whilst driving - no-one stops these people and I see hundreds of people driving while on the phone.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

what a lovely constructed and written post.

 

as with all you have pointed out, particularly the issue of mobile phones.

 

its a really sad inditement of todays society that people cannot be trusted to drive in a responsible manner toward others.

 

sadly, this country really has a serious problem in this aspect.

 

dx

Edited by dx100uk
typo

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what a lovely constructed and written post.

 

as with all you have pointed out, particularly the issue of mobile phones.

 

its a really sad inditement of todays society that people cannot be trusted to drive in a responsible manner toward others.

 

sadly, this country really has a serious problem in this aspect.

 

dx

 

Thank you for that.

 

Might I offer an explanation as to why we are treated as though we might not be trusted?

 

Rebellion at being monitored , watched and controlled in everything we do...we are like animals in many ways, we like and respect our freedom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

aw now you've burst my bubble.....

 

i can't quite honestly see that being monitored & controlled compels people to speed & use a mobile phones just to show they can get away with it, so its useless monitoring me 'cause you cant stop me doing it all the time?

 

the consequences:Text Death Crash Driver Philippa Curtis Jailed Over Victoria McBryde Death | UK News | Sky News

 

 

bit like the age old cry when stopped by the traffic police for speeding of 'why don't you do something useful like catch a kiddy fiddler'

 

urm....

 

lets get rid of all the cameras and traffic police, as long as there is one waiting for when i need them........

 

nuff said

 

dx

Edited by dx100uk
link added

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

aw now you've burst my bubble.....

 

i can't quite honestly see that being monitored & controlled compels people to speed & use a mobile phones just to show they can get away with it, so its useless monitoring me 'cause you cant stop me doing it all the time?

 

the consequences:Text Death Crash Driver Philippa Curtis Jailed Over Victoria McBryde Death | UK News | Sky News

 

 

bit like the age old cry when stopped by the traffic police for speeding of 'why don't you do something useful like catch a kiddy fiddler'

 

urm....

 

lets get rid of all the cameras and traffic police, as long as there is one waiting for when i need them........

 

nuff said

 

dx

 

It is said that "when in a hole one must stop digging" so I'll stop digging. I realise this can be emotive when dealing with justifying speeding and nobody can justify it and I agree totally with what you say here. I am not advocating the necessity or justification of speeding, I just find the necessity to install traffic calming measures in the form of road humps on a wholesale basis going beyond the realms of 'necessity' and into the realms of 'control'.

 

I live on a private estate where the humps have been installed for years as non estate residing individuals use the roads as a bypass or rat run to avoid the village. Speed control is often not their priority. However, I find on public roads, especially ones that would be difficult to speed on anyway, a necessity for these things a total waste of money, counter productive as they cause more congestion through constant stopping to negotiate them,accidents as previously described, they damage peoples health especially as they are routes constantly used by ambulances, busses and the general public and I feel these council workers are on some kind of mission to install as many as they can wherever they can and I'd rather see the tarmac used to 'fill' holes rather than create further obsticles.

 

The obvious benefits on roads where speeding is a problem, outside schools, black spots and the likes I have no difficulties with whatsoever and I am sure they have saved many a life in those instances. As I say, there is no justification for speeding and I'm on no so box for encouraging speeding motorists, but I am aware, every time I go over one of these humps that someone in a council has decided that for whatever reason they think they want to control what I do over that patch of road and it is that which I object to when it is obvious that it has no benefit to that stretch of road whatsoever.

 

I have the same feelings of waste about useless and pointless street furniture councils spend our council tax on, but that's for another day :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

trouble with all this anti speed hump thing, is councils can't just 'decide' where they are put and just do it on a whim.

they must have a justifiable reason which must be linked to a known safety issue [school, residential area, etc etc] to do so and it has to go through several agencies, inc the likes of the highways commision, and be approved.

 

if you're that way inclined, you can view the planning application at your local town hall.

they are all on record.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is questionable legality involved if the road calming measures force you to speeds much lower than the limit. Unfortunately the likelihood is that if you complain, they're more likely to lower the limit than remove the speed bumps.

 

I consider myself a healthy mix of pedestrian, bus passenger and driver and on the whole roads (in London) are a nightmare - for all three.

 

One thing about my area that really bugs me are speed bumps on roads that buses go down - why? Heaven help you if you're a standing passenger. The buses can barely clear them.

 

I can understand road calming measures on smaller roads, or places with lots of pedestrians, near school etc, but my council has gone nuts with it. They closed off my road to through traffic, then when they relaid the road - put speed bumps back in! Nobody even uses my road!

 

I think a lot of it is to do with using up their budget so that it won't be cut next year.

 

One thing I don't think anyone's noted yet is that speed limits are often unrealistic. It's fine to make all residential roads 20mph, but there are many A-roads which could comfortably take 40mph, yet are still 30mph. It seems as though speed limits only go one way.

 

Do the council take into account the environmental effect of having all these cars chugging along so slowly?

 

All in all, considering the rage it provokes, you have to laugh at the fact it's called 'traffic calming' :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...