Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GE Capital Bank


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5582 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife has accounts with Dorothy Perkins and Wallis, both of which are GE Capital Bank.

On 20th January this year, I posted by recorded delivery CCA requests to GE Capital seperate letters for both of them.

I have checked the Track and Trace on Post Office website and both letters were delivered on 21st January.

 

1)This morning my wife received for GE Money a letter regarding the Wallis account which in a nut shell says, we are returning your letter requesting CCA but as you have not provided a signature with the letter we are unable to deal with your request, please sign the letter and return when we will then action it.

 

2) This morning she also received a letter dated 23rd. January, from Howard Cohen , sols from Cleckheaton regarding the Dorothy Perkins Account "NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT" we hereby give you notice of that GE Capital Bank of R?O Agar Street, London, have by an assignment dated 21st January, 2009 and made between GE and CL Finance assigned to CL Finance absolutely a debt in the sum of.....

 

3) She also recived a letter from GE Money dated 26th January basically saying thank you for your CCA request, but sorry nothing to do with us as it's been passed to CL Finance, and further requests should be sent to the Administer of the account Lewis Debt Services, Cleckheaton.

 

4) She also received a Court Claim Form issued by Northampton CCBC dated 26th January, 2009 Claimant CL Finances, address for payments etc., Howard Cohen Sols of Cleckheaton.

 

Right, advice please.

 

1) Can they refuse to provide CCA without signature?

 

2) Can they assign after the request for CCA (clever here, GE assisgn the same day as they receive the request)

 

3) Who do we write to for pre hearing evidence GE Money, GE Capital Bank, CL Finance, Howard Cohen or Lewis Debt Services?

 

Any help gratefully received.

 

I have tried to copy letters ih the past and even used photobucket but they always finish up so small you can't read them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'll move this thread to the DCA Forum, hopefully you'll get help in there.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi mightacorn,

 

1) No they can't refuse a cca request due to no sig, write to them telling them the clock is still ticking and they previously sent you statements etc to that account so they know exactly who you are.

 

2) Bit more tricky as they did it before then 12 working days were up. Was the account in arrears or anything similar?. Not sure on that one.

 

3) if you want info under the CPR then it is Howard Cohen Sols of Cleckheaton as they are dealing with the court claim (their address should be on the form you recieved)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Yes the accounts are in arrears, my wife went to CAB for advice, but although she has no income (she was self employed, but her business has gone bust) they say they cannot help because of my income.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR'd Howard Cohen, received reply today,

 

"We are not obliged to provide this information, and would advise that the particulars of claim detailed in the County Court Claim Form should be sufficient to allow you to respond accordingly.

Please reply to the claim form immediately. Please refer to the Claim Form for details of the time limit by which you are expected to respond. Failure to do so will result in a Judgement being entered without reference to you."

 

 

Advice please on how to respond to Mr Cohen. We have, of course, already sent the Acknowledgement of Service and that she intends to defend the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

It would seem to me that Cohen's are entering sufficient details on the Claim to cover POC requirements under CPR 16 and then using that to defend their failure to provide information under CPR 31.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dont know how far you are with this but here are my 2pennies worth

 

My wife has accounts with Dorothy Perkins and Wallis, both of which are GE Capital Bank.

On 20th January this year, I posted by recorded delivery CCA requests to GE Capital seperate letters for both of them.

I have checked the Track and Trace on Post Office website and both letters were delivered on 21st January.

 

1)This morning my wife received for GE Money a letter regarding the Wallis account which in a nut shell says, we are returning your letter requesting CCA but as you have not provided a signature with the letter we are unable to deal with your request, please sign the letter and return when we will then action it. use this letter

 

Debt:: Letter Templates - Consumer Wiki

 

2) This morning she also received a letter dated 23rd. January, from Howard Cohen , sols from Cleckheaton regarding the Dorothy Perkins Account "NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT" we hereby give you notice of that GE Capital Bank of R?O Agar Street, London, have by an assignment dated 21st January, 2009 and made between GE and CL Finance assigned to CL Finance absolutely a debt in the sum of..... Ok they assigned this around the same time, however thy are still the OC as far as you were concerend so the CCA request still stands

 

3) She also recived a letter from GE Money dated 26th January basically saying thank you for your CCA request, but sorry nothing to do with us as it's been passed to CL Finance, and further requests should be sent to the Administer of the account Lewis Debt Services, Cleckheaton. - See above, and did they send you a NOA

 

4) She also received a Court Claim Form issued by Northampton CCBC dated 26th January, 2009 Claimant CL Finances, address for payments etc., Howard Cohen Sols of Cleckheaton. - Too fast by half, they cant possibly send a court claim if they only sent you the NOA on the 21st, I would write to ClueLess finance and demand their complaints procedure, and also remind them that a cca request is outstanding. also did they send you an LBA

 

Right, advice please.

 

1) Can they refuse to provide CCA without signature? No

 

2) Can they assign after the request for CCA (clever here, GE assisgn the same day as they receive the request) No

 

3) Who do we write to for pre hearing evidence GE Money, GE Capital Bank, CL Finance, Howard Cohen or Lewis Debt Services?

 

Any help gratefully received.

 

I have tried to copy letters ih the past and even used photobucket but they always finish up so small you can't read them.

 

Have you acknowledge the claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem to me that Cohen's are entering sufficient details on the Claim to cover POC requirements under CPR 16 and then using that to defend their failure to provide information under CPR 31.

 

can you post or type up the PoC, also the default notice

 

HC never respond to a cpr request they think they are above that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. can we get a few details,

 

What is the date on the claim form?

Have you acknowledged service saying you intend to defend all of the claim, did you do this within 14 days of the claim?

Can you post up the Particulars of Claim, minus anything which could identify you

 

Sorry PGH....posts crossed

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PGH7447

 

Yes acknowledged claim, and now filed defence.

 

No LBA on either Account, and LOA only came from HC and not from either GE Cap or CL.

 

Just reading letters now, received after Claim form from HC. Claim form states £946.30, and letter staes " You will by now have received a County Claim in the abov matter. We require payment of the sum due in the Cliam of £1071.30 IN FULL, failing which we shall seek judgement against you" and then an explanation of what happens should judgement be entered against her.

 

Other account letter states same thing only Claim for £753.73 but if she pays £860.73 IN FULL etc., etc.,

 

Surely this amounts to an unfair practice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. can we get a few details,

 

What is the date on the claim form?

Have you acknowledged service saying you intend to defend all of the claim, did you do this within 14 days of the claim?

Can you post up the Particulars of Claim, minus anything which could identify you

 

Sorry PGH....posts crossed

 

No CCM your more clued up on this court malarkey, I was just trying to help:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PGH7447

 

Yes acknowledged claim, and now filed defence. Embarrassed I hope

 

No LBA on either Account, and LOA only came from HC and not from either GE Cap or CL.

 

Just reading letters now, received after Claim form from HC. Claim form states £946.30, and letter staes " You will by now have received a County Claim in the abov matter. We require payment of the sum due in the Cliam of £1071.30 IN FULL, failing which we shall seek judgement against you" and then an explanation of what happens should judgement be entered against her. - this is their standard threat-o-gram

 

Other account letter states same thing only Claim for £753.73 but if she pays £860.73 IN FULL etc., etc., what you have 2 court claims?

 

Surely this amounts to an unfair practice?

 

In my opinion yes but in Howard cohens practice normal rules dont seem to apply

 

Make sure you have all the letters sent by these people and all your stuff and arrange in date order so if it does get to court you can show the judge how these SL*** B***S work

 

and I am sure CCM will point you in the right direction, the same as he did for me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfair practice, as pgh says is the norm with CL im afraid:(

Do we have two separate claims here, or have they lumped them together?

 

Can you post up the POC (s), Defence (s)?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for the delay,

Two seperate claims, here's the first:-

Howard Cohen One pictures by mightyacorn2008 - Photobucket

 

and the defence:-

 

http://s461.photobucket.com/albums/qq331/mightyacorn2008/HC%20Defence%20one/

 

 

Second one :-

 

http://s461.photobucket.com/albums/qq331/mightyacorn2008/Howard%20Cohen%20Two

 

Acknowledgement sent on this one just writing defence.

 

It may well be that there is an enforceable CCA for both of these accounts as the first was started 24/01/05 and the second 06/04/06, but obviously won't know until sight of them. But even if they are legal CCAs I am disturbed at HC's action.

Edited by Mightyacorn
Update
Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence looks good, wait for AQs now then, You can insist on the deed of assignment being produced as well then.

 

PS cohens seem to be putting a lot more into their POCs these days....wonder why:rolleyes:

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem to me that Cohen's are entering sufficient details on the Claim to cover POC requirements under CPR 16 and then using that to defend their failure to provide information under CPR 31.

 

 

Thanks CCM, I sit in eager anticipation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...