Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There are example threads where AOS is done but defences are submitted late, it happens, sometimes because MCOL is broken! As the claimant you will be able to reference a late filing and request it be struck out for not following Court Directions, for example if the defendant arrived at court with it on the day without submitting... but I believe there is some (slight) wriggle room for defendants (reasons depending) on late defence. I believe you just need to continue your claim, no defence and not following court directions will almost certainly strengthen your case
    • I'm afraid it's against site rules to recommend lawyers. You could look on the Law Society's Find a Solicitor page for local firms with the right expertise, or google nwnf lawyers in the uk, then check out reviews on social media, review websites and so on, to see how other people rate them. If they say they don't do nwnf, I would ask if they know a firm that does. 403 - The Law Society SOLICITORS.LAWSOCIETY.ORG.UK HB
    • Thanks for that information. I seem to think they have similar names and similar addresses and I thought it was Aldi that was offering the great deal that attracted you to that car park. So we are still stuck with Nexus. Please do not call DCBL about a settlement figure.The first reason is that they have your telephone number which is not something you want to give to those vultures as you rightly call them. They will then harass you on the phone and try and send you last minute details the day before the case -which they shouldn't do. And second they are already charging you £60 to £70 more than they should lawfully, to that they will then add the Court costs that they haven't yet paid or incurred and then say that they will give you this great offer of £150 to avoid going to court.Big deal-not. Were it around £50 that would be a better deal but they would not accept that.   
    • Hugo, how are you getting on? the deadlines can creep up on you. It's useful to have a week or two in drafting a defence, so you can understand it for yourself before submitting. Read other like threads for examples and tailor to suit you. Get one drafted and posted (without personal info) and let us take a look
    • OK thx jk2054 I'll go that route, does anybody have any positive reviews of NWNF law firms they've had experience with? I did consider InjuryLawyers4u, but apparently they're more of a broker, & who you end up dealing with can be hit & miss.  Would rather try & get a sharp firm that are on-top of things if possible.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Misinformation leading to lost money.


Jamhead
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5609 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if I should post this in a new topic but I can't seem to find anything related on it yet, regarding being told nonsense by DWP staff that leads to problems.

 

I was told one thing over the phone; That I couldnt apply for IS until my appeal had been marked as received on their system, but that my money WOULD be backdated as long as I was within a time limit of one month. It took three weeks for my appeal to be put together and for them to mark it as received (even though my recorded delivery stated they received it a week before they said). Now I have been told I am not entitled to receive the backdated three weeks worth of money.

 

I am appealing now against THIS decision. I am furious because I specifically asked if I had to claim straight away, but was told I had to wait until my appeal had been received!

 

What power do people have against being completely misinformed by someone who doesn't know what they're talking about?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jamhead

 

Did you have a claim for Income Support and Incapacity

Benefit prior to failing your PCA

 

If you did and completed your appeal form and they accepted it with in one calendar month then you should have a continuous claim and go on to the appeal rate of IS , thats £48.40 at the moment for a single person.

If they shut your claim you are entitled to have it reopened speak to a supervisor when you call again

 

If you have only just made a claim to I.S and they have hadnt then accepted your PCA appeal and your claim was processed as nil entiitlement

then you can get that looked at agiain and get paid from your date of claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for replying,

 

I was claiming Incap but it was stopped yeah, I rang up the day I was told it was stopped (15th dec) and the bloke said I couldn't claim IS until I'd handed in an appeal, but when I did claim the IS it would be backdated to the day after my Incap was stopped. I definitely got my appeal in within one month of my Incap being stopped (8th of Jan - which is the date I made my claim for IS) so I don't understand why they're now saying I don't fit the criteria for being allowed those three weeks backdated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you were wrongly advised, did you call the call centre to claim I.S or did I,B tell you that.

 

have you made your claim to Income Support now? if you have ask for backdating to December 15th the day you failed your PCA

and explain what happened

be firm with them you can ill afford to lose that money you are entitled to it

see Welfare Rights if you seem to be getting no where, or threaten them with your MP that always works

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was the guy from IB that told me that, obviously it seems to be wrong, which why I'm so furious because I specifically asked if I had to claim today or not, and he said that i didn't. I have to appeal against this decison for definite, I can't afford to lose any money, I've been reduced from £104 to £48 a week anyways.

 

And I'll be on this £48 for up to 6 months it seems while they deliberate over my appeal, probably to be told that it has failed and I should have been claiming JSA, which means these 6 months of reduced rate will be another way for them to save money and wreck my life. Woo!

 

I am going to the CAB and also writing a letter of complaint to my MP, I know of people who have done this and it hasn't gotten them anywhere but I'm still going to. I am pretty disgusted at the way the system works to be honest it seems designed to save money and intimidate people so much that they can't be bothered to deal with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what is called misdirection.

 

It is another matter entirely trying to prove it though. In order for a misdirection to have weight the onus is on the customer to prove it and this would mean that someone in the chain would have to either admit that they provided wrong information or for there to have been a record of it.

 

In your case you also have another point which is that you can prove that the claim was received earlier than they have marked it as you sent it recorded delivery. This, I assume, you covered in your appeal. What will be more difficult as far as the decision maker looking at the appeal is concerned is trying to trace the evidence that you had been misinformed. It isn't that you're lying, it is more to do with being unable to prove that you aren't.

 

As a side note: Experienced benefit-trained staff have had it drummed into them that they should never tell someone NOT to claim a benefit - so if you are told my someone that you should not claim then it is likely that that person is not an experienced, trained staff member. It's a good rule of thumb when getting the type of answer that you got.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice, Insyder.

 

It was the appeal that was sent via recorded delivery and not the claim for IS. I beleive the claim for IS was taken from the day I telephoned to make it. I would have done this the day I found out my IB had been stopped if they hadn't told me I had to wait until the appeal had been received.

 

I understand that if I can't prove I was misinformed then perhaps I don't have a leg to stand on. Are people supposed to record all telephone calls now then? I feel it's unfair that I should be penalised by the DWP beacuse of a simple mistake made by someone working for the DWP.

 

I used to work for my local Job Centre Plus and I recall making advice errors myself when I first started, I always went out the way to put them right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...