Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stat Demand From Hamptons/cap 1


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i know i may be a bit early on this but am i getting near the time when i can send them a CPR request.:D

One of the reasons i wish to know this is while reclaiming my penalty charges from them a couple of years ago, i noticed they had been taking ppi charges every month and as my application form shows (post 4 i think) i ticked the NO box, which was October, then in december they started taking PPI payments. Not that i would claim for it now (not sure if i can) but would deffo go for it once this bit has been cleared up.

 

 

Al

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was me I would try and claim it back, hopefully if this thing gets set aside which I'm sure it will maybe it would be best to let it go but that is a choice for you to make, just relax yourself now you have done all you can and more so, just wait till you get the letter from the court confirming your hearing date, it's even the same at Liverpool County Court I am sure that all the District Judge's there are getting a bit sick of all this as they are around the country, keep us all posted on any further developments on your case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately you can't send a CPR request (did you mean SAR ? Subject Access Request ?) CPR only applies to the civil courts/rules, unfortunately as yours is a stat demand it is governed by the Insolvency Laws, and as far as I know they don't apply. I think possibly in a set aside/bankruptcy case you could request the judge 'order' the other side to produce the documents if the arguments were relevant.

 

As for the SAR, you can send this at any time unfortunately this costs £10 (send postal orders and send recorded/guaranteed) with the letter below, they HAVE to respond to your request within 40 days.

 

Data Protection Act 1998

 

Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

Please supply me with all data that you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

 

1. The original signed, executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

3. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

4. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

5. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

6. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

8. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

9. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

10. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

sign your name but put crosses through it so it can't be 'lifted'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 42 Man.

I shall get that off in the next couple of days and see what it brings.

Blimey a tenner, Must be inflation, last time i did one it was a fiver i think.

Oh well either way it well worth it.

 

Cheers

AL

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All

Quick update, no news from court re set aside have phoned them but they have a massive backlog of cases.

On a brighter note Hampots have sent me a nice letter offering to reduce the amount alledgedly owed by about £1600 leaving £800 approx for full and final settlement. Do you think since i sent them a CCA request (and pointing out that the request i sent Cap 1 over 2 years ago is still unfullfilled) they may be getting cold feet and are now clutching at straws trying to recoup anything they can.

 

AL.

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all

was going to compose a letter to hamptons/lowell that i got friday on reading it properly its was dated 12 feb and i had to reply by the 18th but due to their sending it second class post i never received it till the 20th so that was a pointless communication was it not. Is this an attempt to make themselves look good in the eyes of the court if it gets that far? I have kept the envelope.

 

Ta. AL

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi all

sorry havent updated this been very busy.

Went to court early July and meet with Hampton/Lowels rep, i just listened he said we could sort this out before going in to the court and he explained how serious bankrupcy was and that he was going to push for the court to grant the SD. So with that i brought myself a coffee and waited to be called.

I met the judge (nice lady) and introduced myself and the guy from hamptons.

She understood i was a LIP and said that if i did not understand any of the proceedings to ask her to explain it laymans terms.

Hamptons kicked off saying i owe this much and had ignored all letters from Cap 1 and DCA's and they feel they have done all they can to get me to pay.

She asked for my side of the story i said i had been trying to get a copy of the original CCA and t&c's for almost 3 years to no avail just a copy of the application form, i showed her a copy as Hamptons bloke had no paperwork:grin:, she looked at the application form and said it did have a boxed section headed CCA 1974, but i pointed out that was so they could do credit checks ect. i also added there were no prescribed terms on the application form (the hamptons guy chipped in with 'I disagree, this is a executed agreement') to which i asked him to show me the rate of interest term, the credit limit term and my discharge of obligations term, to which he looked quite glum:(. The judge did point out that the form did have Application Form written quite clearly in big letters and said it was obviously not a regulated agreement just an application form.

I then pointed out there were unlawful charges on the account and that the PPI box had been quite clearly ticked NO (and i was in a job where if i was sick/disabled/or died i was covered by my employer)yet they had continually taken payments for it. I handed the Judge a spreadsheet listing all the payments for ppi and interest added by Cap 1 (totals nearly £2000 with contractual interest added) she studied it for a minute or so and then looked up at the guy from hampots and said 'I find the use of SD's in cases such as these an Abuse of Process and she told the guy to relay her message back to hamptons/lowells as soon as we had left the court.

She then asked me what i wanted from Cap 1, i said i would ask for disclosure of the Original Agreement, Default notice, Deed of assignment, and written proof that i asked for PPI.

So she made an order to that effect (they have 42 days from 4th June to get the documents back to the court) then its back to court in September.

I asked for cost but i think she said she had reserved them till next time.

Anyway thanked her and got up to leave but she asked guy from hampots/lowells to remain.

So am now looking forward to September.

:grin:

AL

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done....i'd say that they have possibly committed fraud by adding PPI payments when you had ticked the 'No' box...if so i'd say that the whole contract is tainted anyway......keep us posted, when you go back to court, you should get your costs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...