Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is an interesting Final Notice. Firstly because there is usually a reminder Notice before the final Notice. Secondly because it contains some of the wording that should be in the original PCN [aka Notice to keeper]. It could be that the necessary wording in the NTK is missing so they put it in the Reminder Notice to cover their error. If they have it hasn't worked. But the only wat we will know if you post up the back page of the Notice to keeper along with the other details asked for on Post 8 .  If they have got it wrong it means that they are unable to transfer the liability to pay the PCN from the driver to the keeper . I take it that you are the keeper and not the hirer? And do you know how long you are supposed to stay in that car park? In the past I have found Sainsbury's pretty good at cancelling PCNs for their customers. Take both PCNs in to the store and point out if you are a regular customer and that the driver spent a lot of money in their store and see if they could please do something with the ticket for you. if the manager can't help, then come back and we will give you their Head office and write to them. It is the easiest and quickest way to get the ticket cancelled. No point in appealing since that would mean they lose the chance to make any money out of you which is their whole reason for running the car park. If you cannot get Sainsbury to cancel then we rely on ECP getting things wrong so that you don't have to pay  on a technicality or technicalities. For example if the PCN does not comply with the Act and the keeper is not then liable it makes it difficult for ECP to win should it go to court as so many people are legally able to drive your car and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Which is why we do need to see the questionnaire filled in and the rest of the NTK. Also it would be helpful to get photos of the signs in the car park. Ones that can be read by us, and the sign at the entrance as well as the inside ones especially those that are worded differently. Poor signage is another defence that works well and you will  need a good defence should they decide to go to Court.
    • Thanks for answer ref address/bank. Thought it wise to double-check.   When I reply to them as per post #5, what should my reason for dispute be?   " dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation."
    • Alternative is to access the video yourself, upload to YouTube or similar and link back here.  Video will be accessible once you input your details into Wandsworth website: https://parking.wandsworth.gov.uk/pcn  
    • Yeah only £10 so may as well just get it done. When it comes to liaising with the police and bargaining before it hopefully goes to court. How does that happen? Via email? Phone call etc
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • I agree
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Security, Callserve and the Old Court House?


sosumi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4883 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

dont think they will leave us alone!!

 

You need to show them that your are going to be VERY DIFFICULT to deal with - by boning up on all your rights and how to use things like the £1 CCA request, £10 SAR and CUPTR 2008 - there are templates and examples of all these things in CAG templates or other relevant threads.

 

First thing to do is send the DCA a PROVE IT Letter - including bits from the anti harassment letter - i.e telling them DO NOT telephone me or send any calers to my home - only communicate in writing - see templates on CAG on these issues.

 

If you want to put together your own letter (based on templates ) then feel free to post it up for us to check and comment on before posting off - Ensure it contains NOTHING that can identify you - E.g. Exact amounts claimed, dates , account nos etc.

 

DCA's are lazy - and tend to only be paid on results - so they will make life unbearable for soft touches who agree to payments and will veer away from those putting up a fight - like all bullies.

 

Remember - KNOWLEDGE IS POWER - NIL ILLEGITIMI CARBORUNDUM!

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I cam't afford the £1 so happy for them to waste their postage on me - always amazes em that they seem to think the same tactics will work when previously they have failed when they get your details for the second or third time

If you can keep you head when all of those around you are losing theirs try parking your helicopter somewhere else

 

 

The PPI Saga

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just that - something that WOULD stand up in Court. However I'm pretty sure it won't happen - CSL seem to be pretty useless.

 

They CAN'T clamp your car without proper authority - and private clamping is about to be (or is now?) outlawed in England - as it was in Scotland many years ago.

 

Sorry if I spooked you - just wanted to re-assure you.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure they would say that they have, more then likely a signed and enforceable CCA (which my hubby does not recall signing), just waiting for the day the papers land! as I have said before the SAR was shocking and there are no default letters or notices of assignment. need to win the lottery to pay it off, its not an large amount circa £1900.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response. Unfortunately "Credsec" and it's associated email addresses are either no longer in existence or have taken down the website. CSL appear to be a bunch of shady bullyboys, and in the absence of an email address I'll just send a recorded delivery intimidating letter of my own.

I dont have an address but think there may h ave been one posted earlier on in this thread. i will have a look on my paperwork at home?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that - most appreciated. My current position is annoyed and resentful with Lloyds TSB, and intending to stop these thugs calling me at work.

a recorded letter (if your funds allow) is generally the best method as you can track and prove delivery, but will check for you this evening and come back to you.

 

What is your current position?

Link to post
Share on other sites

will do. will this send them away though.......!

 

They would be VERY stupid if they lied in response to a CPUTR 2008 request asking them to confirm they had in their possession an original signed properly executed CCA. If they say they have, ask for a true photocopy of the ENTIRE document and all other documents referred to within it. If they refuse, ask them where you can inspect the original. If they still refuse tell them that in any court proceedings you will be putting them to strict proof. I bet no proceedings will happen.

 

Regarding other posts on spending the £1 on a CCA request, or the cost of Recorded Delivery - a CPUTR 2008 request (which is free) is more useful than the CCA S.77/78 request (which costs £1) and if you get proof of posting (free from any post office) - you don't need to pay for RD since under Interpretation Act, if you posted a letter and it is not returned to you, it is deemed to have been delivered.

 

I always put on my letters PROOF OF POSTING OBTAINED - PLEASE NOTE PROVISIONS OF INTERPRETATION ACT.

 

So, to summarise, if you use good CAG templates (modified to fit) you will show these pond life that you KNOW your rights, (telephone harassment, CCA, CPUTR, Interpretation Act etc.) then they should realise YOU are NOT going to be easy pickings and IF THEY CAN'T ENFORCE the debt, then they should stop wasting their money and your time and go after some other less well informed hapless soul.

 

Good luck!

 

BD

Edited by Bigdebtor
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think they will get the signed CCA's from the OC as a matter of course - and would need to ask for them to respond to a CPUTR 2008 request - so would possibluy just hand the file back to the OC at that point. I'm about to test this out with CSL, AKtiv Kapital and Cabot.

 

Many OC's such as MBNA, Barclaycard (a big CSL customer) shredded a lot of signed CCA documents in the mid 2000's - so neither they nor their DCA's can actually produce them - they try to bluff using Carey and S77/78 instead of actually coming right out and saying they don't have an original signed properly executed CCA agreement.

 

It's a numbers game - many people give in to letter threats, telephone harassment etc. - so court is a last (more expensive and less reliable) option for most DCA's. Some are more litiguous (Bryan Carter?) than others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will look for a good template and modify and post up later today for clearance to go!

 

my thoughts are - IF they had a valid CCA would they not have insitgasted proceedings as CSL seem to be bully thugs as this particular thread has shown?

 

FDAO

 

See attched link about a thread I tried to get going on this topic.

 

Hope it helps?

 

BD

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?227592-How-ready-are-various-DCA-s-or-Original-Creditors-to-go-to-Court&p=2520642&viewfull=1#post2520642

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - see above post 65. Until you've used CPUTR 2008 you don't know just what ammo CSL have. They may well have what they need - but no sense second guessing.

 

As I said, Court action is almost always a last (high risk) resort especially for a DCA. Also if you've got wider issues - other debts/arrears etc. then I would think about contacting CCCS etc. and get their help to keep the wolves at bay - but first read this excellent thread - lots of good advice here!

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?289118-At-the-end-of-your-tether-an-alternative-debt-management-strategy&p=3246590&viewfull=1#post3246590

 

BD

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

From doing a bit of digging on this site and a few others consumer sites, it appears that dca like csl, iqor, and apex are the last of the real chasers that lloyds use and thing go quite when you have seen off these. Also it does appear that none of these companies have any real bite, only the original creditor can take you to court and these are working on the oc behalf.

The one thing i have found that gives me some concern, is a few threads i have found where everything goes quite for a couplw of years its just about to go statue barred and a statutory demand turns up from a dca who specialise in buying debts that are almost sb.

Its been quite for me for sometime now

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got Apex as one of the first ones then CSL and now Iqor

 

Even when people had my phone number CSL never used to call just write lots of letters which I have kept for now

 

Feelingdownandout don't stress over CSL :-)

If you can keep you head when all of those around you are losing theirs try parking your helicopter somewhere else

 

 

The PPI Saga

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks RV, the thing is ideally I would love to pay it off for hubby and get rid once and for all, just done have money like that sticking out my back pocket! not to mention that the OC wouldnt agree a repayment plan, and the other DCA's were holding is to ransom on agreeing a dmp (pay stupid deposit now and we will condsider a dmp) so just took the advice given and did nothing. the famous CSL pink letter appeared with 'final chance to pay a reduced amount' or court action, thing is what to do next...!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...