Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt Collectors pretending to be bank


Mustard
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5334 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

correct, costs £1 send it by recorded delivery if you get an agreement within the 12+2 days time limit post it up on here for it to be checked out

 

Will do.

 

This place is certainly an eye opener!

 

In the meantime, when they call I just say "everything in writing now please" ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct, do not even bother to go through the security questions, really pee's the phone drones off:)

 

:D

 

When they ask what is my date of birth / mothers maiden name I'll just say "I cant remember, can you give me a clue?"

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a really interesting thread, maybe a bit off subject but how do HBOS decide which debts get sold to 1st credit and which go to CL Finance?

 

Is it highest bidder or difficulty collecting?

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a really interesting thread, maybe a bit off subject but how do HBOS decide which debts get sold to 1st credit and which go to CL Finance?

 

Is it highest bidder or difficulty collecting?

Probably something to do with whoever is first to supply a tub of vaseline...

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today is the day they said is "my last chance to pay before legal action" I have just had a text message from them asking me to call.

But you're not going to call of course, and you're not going to talk to them if they call you.

 

For the hell of it, send them the telephone harassment letter as well, telling them in no uncertain terms to correspond in writing only.

 

Then, if they call or text again, they'll have to change the message to "...last chance to pay before illegal action".

 

Over the years there have been many laws passed to prevent minority groups from being insulted and harassed, like Race Relations, Homophobia and many more - maybe debt recovery is the only place left for all the bigots who can't get their kicks in any other way? Lots of shouting and threats, making people feel small and worthless, but when you look at where they stand legally they are the ones often found to be breaking the law.

 

In the same way as there is nothing wrong with the colour of your skin, or sexual orientation, ther's nothing wrong with being in debt, especially when your personal circumstances have forced this upon you. I do disagree with some people mis-using the law just to get out of paying, but we usually find on CAG that the people needing help are those who have been forced into a corner by the DCA's. Once you find out the true story of how the DCA's operate you tend not to be as willing to co-operate with their demands, we need to appreciate that they are just bullies...

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But you're not going to call of course, and you're not going to talk to them if they call you.

 

For the hell of it, send them the telephone harassment letter as well, telling them in no uncertain terms to correspond in writing only.

 

Then, if they call or text again, they'll have to change the message to "...last chance to pay before illegal action".

 

Over the years there have been many laws passed to prevent minority groups from being insulted and harassed, like Race Relations, Homophobia and many more - maybe debt recovery is the only place left for all the bigots who can't get their kicks in any other way? Lots of shouting and threats, making people feel small and worthless, but when you look at where they stand legally they are the ones often found to be breaking the law.

 

In the same way as there is nothing wrong with the colour of your skin, or sexual orientation, ther's nothing wrong with being in debt, especially when your personal circumstances have forced this upon you. I do disagree with some people mis-using the law just to get out of paying, but we usually find on CAG that the people needing help are those who have been forced into a corner by the DCA's. Once you find out the true story of how the DCA's operate you tend not to be as willing to co-operate with their demands, we need to appreciate that they are just bullies...

 

:) They will have my CCA letter by now too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today is the day they said is "my last chance to pay before legal action" I have just had a text message from them asking me to call.

 

:evil:

 

Send a text back saying 'Last chance to send CCA before I stop paying'

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are saying that they are preparing to take me to court to put a charge on my house, and make me bankrupt? :eek:

 

Have a good read through the forums here so you can get a good understanding of the tactics that DCA's use to get you to pay them. I remember a phone call with them at least two years ago....

 

Them : Pay us in full.

Me : I can't I don't have any money.

Them : We'll take you to court and they'll force you to pay.

Me : They can't I don't have any money.

Them : We'll get the court to send a bailiff round to take all your possessions.

Me : Go ahead there's nothing left I've sold it all on ebay.

Them : We'll go to the courts to repossess your house.

Me : Go ahead I'm in negative equity so you'll be doing me a favour.

Them : We'll file a bankruptcy claim.

Me : Go ahead I'm already technically bankrupt and you'll save me the cost of doing it myself.

 

They did eventually take it to court, just before Christmas so it took them over two years from that phone call, which I'm now fighting and am currently in a pretty strong position due to them being bunch of morons and being unable to file the court claim properly.

 

Follow the advice on the forums and you'll sort it out, if you're worrying or panicking then don't - that is exactly what they want you to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suprise Suprise they called me Saturday morning.

 

Conversation went like this

 

1st C - "hello is that Mr Mustard?"

Me - "yes it is"

1st C - "This is 1st Credit, re your Halifax Account"

Me - "Im doing everything by post now, you should of recieved my CCA request letter"

1st C - "Yes thats why we are callling"

Me - "I assumed you would of recieved it this morning"

1st C - "I would like to discuss that with you"

(taken through security questions)

 

Basically they said that once the CCA has been sent I am then liable for the FULL AMOUNT without fail :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

...they called me Saturday morning.

1st C - "hello is that Mr Mustard?"

(taken through security questions)

Basically they said that once the CCA has been sent I am then liable for the FULL AMOUNT without fail :mad:

That's the first rule of CAG broken - DO NOT speak with these people on the phone, insist everything is in writing. This protects you from them making spurious remarks on your computer file at their end - for all you know they could now have your 'full agreement' to pay up on their system, and can you prove otherwise?

Once you've gone through 'security' they can confirm they spoke to you. If you're going to do 'everything by post' thern stick to that rule.

 

...they said that once the CCA has been sent I am then liable for the FULL AMOUNT without fail...

Usual uninformed trash - IF they can produce a CCA, and it's valid, they may ask you to consider payment. If the CCA is unenforceable then you tell them so, if they miss the deadline for providing the document, tell them so.

 

At the end of all this, presuming they could find a legally binding document, you do not have to jump because they say so. They still don't have any power to foce you to do anything, unless it goes through a court. That's the only time you listen to someone telling you what to pay and when, not because some threat monkey at FC says so.

 

Remember who started the agressive behaviour in dealing with this.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
correct, costs £1 send it by recorded delivery if you get an agreement within the 12+2 days time limit post it up on here for it to be checked out

 

Hi all.

 

Well the 12 + 2 time limit has past and no sign of the agreement?

 

What now?!? :?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sit back and do nothing. They are in LEGAL DEFAULT of your CCA request and should cease all collection activity. If they telephone you or send any more begging letters then let us know and we will give you a suitable BOGOFF letter for them.

 

Their behaviour to date has been completely against all the rules even though their leader regularly spouts on that his threat monkeys abide by the rules. Total hoqwash of course but I suppose he is of the Josef Goebbels school of thought that if you repeat a lie often enough people will beieve it.

 

They may pass this alleged debt on to their paramilitary wing CONnaught.

 

NEVER SPEAK TO A DCA OTHER THAN THROUGH A MEDIUM

Link to post
Share on other sites

..

 

They may pass this alleged debt on to their paramilitary wing CONnaught.

 

 

NEVER SPEAK TO A DCA OTHER THAN THROUGH A MEDIUM

 

What? There is someone worse than the current lot?! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worst Credit use their closely related buddies CONnaught Collections to do their dirty work. CONnaught are well known for their frivolus use of the Statutory Demand System. They are as reputable as Worst Credit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worst Credit use their closely related buddies CONnaught Collections to do their dirty work. CONnaught are well known for their frivolus use of the Statutory Demand System. They are as reputable as Worst Credit

 

So then what happens? Does this whole thing start all over again like pass the parcel with the alleged debt??

 

What is the normal outcome to these situations, do they have to right it off because they dont have the legal power to do anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If 1st Credit do not comply with your Legal request for a CCA within 12 working days they become in DEFAULT and as such should not pass the alleged debt on or take any collection activity with regard to it. Sit tight until you hear from them

Link to post
Share on other sites

If 1st Credit do not comply with your Legal request for a CCA within 12 working days they become in DEFAULT and as such should not pass the alleged debt on or take any collection activity with regard to it. Sit tight until you hear from them

 

The 12 working day deadline passed last week, and still no sign of the CCA

Link to post
Share on other sites

It happens so often that they will claim it is normal practise for the DCA's to do this :mad:

 

Then again, the whole process could do with testing out properly - it it legal for a DCA to issue paperwork on behalf of their 'client'? Is the bank still their client, even though they have bought the account details? If a court was to decide that the original creditor was no longer responsible for the account as soon as the debt was sold on, would they then be liable to send a letter of assignment anyway?

 

Chicken and egg, they either abide by the cut-off point, as soon as the debt is sold, or carry out the final act of sending the letter. I'm unsure how this stands in law but, as I originally said, the DCA's consider it part of them taking an account on to send the letter with their introduction.

 

Even if someone got this type of thing to court as fraud, it's going to be difficult to recall the thousands of similar letters already issued. I mean, all those DCA's without a leg to stand on... :rolleyes:

 

An assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor and assumes all rights under the original contract. DCAs often state that they are collecting a debt on behalf of a client, therefore implying that an agency exists.

 

If the former applies, the DCA cannot pretend, for want of a better word, to be the bank or company that was a party to the original agreement. The debt "belongs" to the DCA as all of the rights of the original party have been extinguished.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Update -

 

The DCA just called me and said that "they cannot find a copy of the CCA " the money I sent them for the CCA will not be refunded and that its just as much my responsabilty to keep a copy

 

This actually becoming a farce.

 

Any thoughts and comments welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...