Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • so return of goods order etc etc read upload  scan pages to jpg, redact in mspaint. the convert to and merge to one mass PDF  read upload and use the online listed sites for all 3 stages. do you want to keep the car? i will guess this was a manual paper claimform direct from the co.court or was it org sent from salford bulk processing and has just got reaq ssigned?      
    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue –  29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached  2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00. The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month. 3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement, Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us. Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement 9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate 4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:- a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement  number xxxxxx. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     The total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by First class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges 5.  At the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage. Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024  What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg  
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mortgage Securitisation - Preferred


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4523 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi SC

 

It's called ' digestion', chewing it all over and working it through the system before we deposit the resulting 'load' onto an unsuspecting bank

 

A metaphor worthy of BRW! And...

 

That's probably why things have gone a bit quiet, the arguments have been laid out by supersleuth, ravaged by Suetonius, digested by many and are still being considered and waiting until someone gets in front of a judge to test it...what more to do then than keep exploring, keep arguing (nicely ) and debating the for's and againsts so we can be prepared..

 

You are of course right. This is exactly what we are doing. Only digging will illuminate the hitherto 'dark arts' of our foes. Much light has already been shed otherwise they wouldn't keep coming back to have a peek!

 

Good to hear from you again. Cheers KTF. EIE.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi Sced.

 

No. It's not against the disclosure rules you will have up to about 72 hours before the hearing but you must submit your N244 with the defence appended by the due date. The submission comes later so plenty time to get your head around all that stuff.

 

Have you already been given a hearing date? Don't say what it is on open forum though. Just a yes or no will suffice!

 

Cheers EIE. Keep the faith.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to ask but think the answer is self explanitory that the solicitors fees that i am being charged as a result of the initial hearing should be added to the end of the mortgage account and not the arrears balance as they are not actually arrears?

 

SC so what you are saying is that should I blow the lid on the securitisation thing and that Preferred have no right to bring a claim then Preferred (albeit they no longer exist) could buy the mortgage back and continue with action?

 

When they originally got the suspended order Preferred still owned my mortgage. It was after that they sold it off so does this mean that the order would pass over to the new owners or would the order no longer exist and the new owners would have to start all over again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sced.

 

No. It's not against the disclosure rules you will have up to about 72 hours before the hearing but you must submit your N244 with the defence appended by the due date. The submission comes later so plenty time to get your head around all that stuff.

 

Have you already been given a hearing date? Don't say what it is on open forum though. Just a yes or no will suffice!

 

Cheers EIE. Keep the faith.

 

No not got a hearing that yet as I am still working on the defence i wish to attach i.e your first email. I am hoping to submit this tomorrow. I assumed that I must submit my defence with the N244 before I could get a hearing date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to ask but think the answer is self explanitory that the solicitors fees that i am being charged as a result of the initial hearing should be added to the end of the mortgage account and not the arrears balance as they are not actually arrears?

 

SC so what you are saying is that should I blow the lid on the securitisation thing and that Preferred have no right to bring a claim then Preferred (albeit they no longer exist) could buy the mortgage back and continue with action?

 

When they originally got the suspended order Preferred still owned my mortgage. It was after that they sold it off so does this mean that the order would pass over to the new owners or would the order no longer exist and the new owners would have to start all over again?

 

 

My understanding from a JonCris quote which I latched on to as I thought it quite succinct was that a claimant has to have suffered a loss to enable them to bring a claim for compensation such as repossession. Now if the company standing before the court claiming to be the Claimant has been paid in full by an SPV for your mortgage then they have suffered no loss and therefore are in no position to make this claim. That's not to say the spv can't claim, but then the spv are not in court are they? So what would a Judge make of that?

 

Now I have absolutely NO legal training and I haven't a clue from giving advice on any of this, so I am not the one to be telling anyone anything and you should take no notice of what I say from a legal perspective. I'm just telling you how I read this, nothing else so perhaps someone with more knowledge about these things can help you. I just know that if and when I find out exactly who my spv is and I end up in court defending a repo action I might, just might use this as a last resort if I were to be losing my home .

 

SC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sced

 

Yes. My word this thread has burst into life again! Get your N244, sorted first.

 

In all likelihood when preferred commenced action your mortgage had already been securitised. This is the ruse - it was securitised in pretty damn short order - they just didn't tell you. Their being named as the claimant in the original action has got bugger all to do with it. They had no rights and they knew it. They were abusing the civil process by hoodwinking both you and the courts into believing they still had 'true ownership'.

 

As for blowing the lid - even a gentle prising open and a smidgen of cast doubt could do it. There is a legitimate difference of opinion amongst caggers on this. My view is and always has been that at the moment it's bloody difficult to go into court on the securitisation stuff alone. Not saying it's impossible mind you. As they have flouted all manner of consumer regs and laws these are worth raising also. But it's an interesting question to put to the court.

 

1. They sold the mortgage and received full consideration for it. They have therefore suffered no loss resulting from your alleged breach. They therefore have no entitlement to bring a claim against you.

 

2. their continued presence on the land registry, having sold the mortgage, is the result of their deliberate failure to do that which they are mandated to do BY the LRA 2002 and amend the register accordingly.

3. hence the LRA is no longer adequate proof of ownership. Where there is doubt, the court will not want to be found to be making an error in law in their favour. Better to hold off will be most judges thinking.

 

Hope that has come across correctly.

 

Cheers.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed EIE it full of life now.

 

Your points have come across fine thanks.

 

When I ask that the claimant should prove that have the legal right to make a claim. What if they say we have the right due to the Land Registry and contract etc. If I argue that the LR is no longer adequate proof then out of interest how would they prove they have a legal right and surely a judge will think the same? Just trying to think about how they would be expected to prove their ownership.

 

Also if the court ordered that Preferred disclose the sale and that the SPV disclose there ownership then would it not be that the SPV would simply deny the ownership on the basis of blowing the lid?

 

Am i starting to make my own problems now asking this cos if i am then ill shut up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sced

 

In all probability they can't prove it - they can't prove it because they no longer have the right.

 

1. You need the prospectus that preferred's spv issued for the date roughly 3 months after you took out your mortgage. This details the whole transaction process and runs to about 200-250 pages normally. Have you got this? If not You have to go down to the FSA. It may be better to see if someone else on this thread was with preferred. They might already have it. The prospectus is useful because it lays bare their intention not to amend the LR in accordance with the law. So in their own words they say they are not going to do this, even though they have to, it raises two issues. a) Why not? So they can 'prove' in court they still own the mortgage when they don't b) their a la carte approach to the law. Judges don't like that!

 

2. There should be a map of the transaction structure. That will lead you to the trustee. The trustee's role is to 'guarantee' the security of the notes investors investment. They do this by registering under form 395 at companies house. Once the trustee has made this entry this can be used to say to the judge why does this entry appear if preferred still hold legal title? Simple answer it can't. Either preferred are then lying or the SPV lied to investors.

 

That's my reading of it!!!

 

If the clock is ticking - and it is - I seriously suggest you get your defence sorted out. This stuff can wait - right?

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sced

 

Who is the legal firm acting for 'preferred'?

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed this stuff can definately wait.

 

As i previously stated in the thread I thought my mortgage was sold off to Eurosail in 2007 about 4months after I took the mortgage out. I thought this only because of the general rule of when they usually sell them off. For this i had both the prospectus and the form 395 from companies house which i was of course happy to have this info. Now the problem is that they wrote to me about the buildings insurance and mention that the mortgagee is Mortgage Funding 2008 1-BL. This company does not exist with the -BL on the end but i assume the company listed at companies house it these idiots as the address is the usual Wilmington Trust SP. I have downloaded the Form 395 which states that the charge was created on 19th March 2008. Unfortunately i have not found the prospectus and think i may not online as the terms 'Mortgage' and 'Funding' are too broad to return anything usual and will just consist of lots of useless info on mortgages and funding in general. Therefore I am left with the conclusion that either Preferred sold my mortgage in 2007 to maybe Eurosail and then bought it back and resold it again to Mortgage Funding or they did not sell it at all until almost a year later. This will probably be a mistery. I would like to get the prospectus but again fear that due to time I am not going to be able to get to the FSA in London to get it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sced

 

Who is the legal firm acting for 'preferred'?

 

The legal firm is Optima Legal but originally it was erm i cant remember the name but it the other lot that Preferred and SPML etc use or used as the case may now be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sced

 

I'm just thinking that there must be one Preferred expert here who can nail this stuff far more quickly than I. So a general call to preferred veterans - can you point Sced in the right direction?

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sced many of us read our notification emails WITHOUT coming onto the forum which of course means it looks like it's gone quiet. It ain't there's stuff going on which for the moment is best left off the forum - Also Confucius he say "slowly slowly catchee monkey"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look lets be frank it's doubtful that your going to get their claim thrown out in it's entirety the court may well offer them a fig leaf such as registering the name with the LR then resubmitting an application in the correct name & if that happens then there are all kinds of other avenues to follow (not least taxation) - in the meantime you need to throw everything at them - this should at least, & even the court doesn't understand it, muddy the waters sufficient to stop possession

 

Of course it may be that you go before a Judge who does indeed understand in which case you may find him/her very sympathetic to your cause but even if you do & win it may well only be the 1st round as the SPiVs ain't gonna go down without a fight

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look lets be frank it's doubtful that your going to get their claim thrown out in it's entirety the court may well offer them a fig leaf such as registering the name with the LR then resubmitting an application in the correct name & if that happens then there are all kinds of other avenues to follow (not least taxation) - in the meantime you need to throw everything at them - this should at least, & even the court doesn't understand it, muddy the waters sufficient to stop possession

 

Of course it may be that you go before a Judge who does indeed understand in which case you may find him/her very sympathetic to your cause but even if you do & win it may well only be the 1st round as the SPiVs ain't gonna go down without a fight

 

Hi JC

 

I can quite believe that they will fight but Im afraid I will fight too. This is my house we are talking about so i will do everything and anything I can. See these people are saying my arrears are over £5k where infact they are more like £1700. Massive difference. If it come to the crunch I could borrow the money and pay the £1700 but not the alleged £5k. Now the way i see it is that there is no way i want to borrow the money to pay the arrears just to keep these idiots at bay as im sure they would come back at me another time.

 

Sorry JC just read it back and may come across as an attack on you but it not i just have a terrible way of wording things sometimes.

Edited by scedminc
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sced

 

You can bet your last they will keep coming back.

 

This is very very serious stuff. Bank charges? Teddy bear's picnic compared to this. Of course they exaggerate the arrears. Of course they delay SARs. Of course they don't comply with CPR's. Of course they break the effing law with virtual impunity. THEY HAVE TO TAKE YOUR HOUSE. It is their only logic, their only purpose and their sole raison d'etre.

 

Screwing you over with vastly inflated interest rates was only the opening of the game. This is the end game. You have got to keep on fighting it off.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sced

 

You can bet your last they will keep coming back.

 

This is very very serious stuff. Bank charges? Teddy bear's picnic compared to this. Of course they exaggerate the arrears. Of course they delay SARs. Of course they don't comply with CPR's. Of course they break the effing law with virtual impunity. THEY HAVE TO TAKE YOUR HOUSE. It is their only logic, their only purpose and their sole raison d'etre.

 

Screwing you over with vastly inflated interest rates was only the opening of the game. This is the end game. You have got to keep on fighting it off.

 

I think all these people behind this stuff which obviously have too much money to ever have to worry about stuff like losing there house should all be stripped of everything in life then dumped on a remote island to rot!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sced

 

I think all these people behind this stuff which obviously have too much money to ever have to worry about stuff like losing there house should all be stripped of everything in life then dumped on a remote island to rot!!!!

 

Agreed. But in this case the remote islands in question are merely tax remote. Geurnsey, Jersey and the Cayman Islands to be precise.

 

As a previous cagger has already observed - a near perfect [problem]. It is our hard work our overtime (precious little of that left) and our taxes that fund this shower's luxurious lifetstyle.

 

SPiVs. Never was an entity so well named. George Orwell couldn't have invented this.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a little contribution!

 

I had a mortgage with the sharks at PML from May 2006 until September 2008, extortionate interest rates, lost my job in the interim and got royally scr*wed by PML with charges. Obstacles put up by PML/Capstone at EVERY opportunity to all proposals, even down to refusing to prepare redemption statements when we finally sold up. I have now just discovered that the sh**s have put a default on my file, albeit never issued us with a default notice!

 

Anyway I have sent them a nice little DPA SAR letter today, so they can look forward to getting that in the morning! Hey ho!

 

H

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi H

 

Yeah right. and wait for their (none) reply. They have a policy of NOT complying in any way shape or form they can. Crapstone are Wasters. Contact the Information Commissioner in 40 days time when they haven't responded. Useless.

 

The IC is a bit tame but have promised to beef things up. Good luck.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Well i am now completely gobsmacked and confused i too recently had a letter querying my building insurance policy. I have just read through the last few posts and went to find the letter it quotes that my building insurance should quote "note the interest of Eurosail-UK 2007-4BL as mortgagee" I only took this mortgage out in April 2007 so what is going off ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? I recently went to court but it got adjourned whilst preferred or whoever sorted out their paperwork. They then decided to go for a liberty to restore if i default again before Feb 2010. Are you saying that this was all out of order.

 

Your comments are very much appreciated

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Uneverdid

 

I recently went to court but it got adjourned whilst preferred or whoever sorted out their paperwork. They then decided to go for a liberty to restore if i default again before Feb 2010. Are you saying that this was all out of order.

 

 

Of course it's all out of order. IT WAS DESIGNED THAT WAY. Why? Pure greed and extortion. Pay us what we demand, when we demand or we will take your house.

 

I bet if you check your statements a horror show will unfold. In fact I guarantee it. Do not be confused - you are the victim of a [problem] - pure and simple.

 

You were lucky to get a whole 9 months. Watch them like hawks. They will tell you you need to pay X and then will allege a shortfall when you pay x. They will tell you you have missed payments when you haven't. They will reinstate at the drop of a hat without even telling you. They will refuse to comply with any disclosure requests you make under CPR 31.6 or under the DPA. They will eff you over, by fair means OR foul (usually the latter).

 

They HAVE NO CHOICE. They Must do their SPiV Master's bidding. And that I'm afraid is summed up in one simple word. REPOSSESS.

 

Note the interst of Eurosail basically means they don't even have the right to bring a claim against you.

 

As it is liberty to restore you must resist any further attempt with full force any subsequent suspended order as if it were a full repo order. A suspended order can be easily converted and rubber stamped by the court. YOU HAVE TO FIGHT THESE DISGUSTING PARASITES. Keep on the posts. Blase resignation is not the way to go. Not suggesting you are BUT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no intention giving up, on or around p.28 of this thread i posted copies up of notice of power of attorney giving Capstone power by Preferred but i am sure these are dated after suposedly Eurosail become the mortgagee.

Confused i am but a quitter i am not so fear not i will fight everything they throw at me. My fixed rate is up next month and they have asked me to go on another fixed rate with them at the same rate as now plus 1% which would make it 7.9% however at the end of my fixed my rate is only 3.79% plus the current 3 month libor rate which is currently 1.1% making a total of 4.8%. They got quite arsey (for want of a better word) with me when i said no thanks i would take my chances, they kept going on about how interest rates are going to go up rapidly within the next 6 months.

I despise these peoples they prey on vulnerable people, cus lets face it we wouldnt be with them if our circumstances allowed us to go elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...