Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Can you tell us more about what happened please? Who stopped you and which shop? Best, HB
    • You don't mention what the debts are, which is important, as it really depends on the details in deciding best course of action. So list types of debt e.g credit card, type of loan, utility bill; current owner bank or dca; approximate amount for each debt.  And do you own any property assets. There is no blanket advice regarding all types of debts. Whoever you contact regarding debt advice would want to know all of the information. The debt buying businesses deal with multi billions worth of debts. They can't issue Court claims for most debts as the cost of pursuing would be ruinous and don't have staff resources. Instead they rely on credit records being impacted and therefore people need to resolve the debts. And they rely on anxious debtors paying amounts after receiving threatening communications. If you know you are likely to be made redundant, start looking for other employment soon. Due to longer recruitment processes being followed by employers, it can take about 3 months between applying and starting a new job.
    • Hi I was caught shoplifting 4 items £20 worth, I’m petrified the Police will come to my house now please can you help. What can I do I worried about my job. 
    • I heard nothing more from J&P but have now had an email from the bank saying they have instructed IDR to act on their behalf?  so are they just passing it back? Selling it on again? I don’t know if this is a good or bad thing 
    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please help with CABOT - debt's doubled!!


stikky62
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4948 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Hadituptohere.

 

yes, I addressed it ,, 'For the Attention of the District Judge ' at my local law courts. I sent it special delivery and it was received on tuesday 21st. I didn't think to ring the court to see if it was being acted on. Will there be anyone there on a Saturday? If so I'll ring tomorrow after the postmans been. Otherwise, i'll have to ring first thing monday morning. If I filled in the allocation questionaire tonight I wouldn't be able to get it to the post office tomorow anyway now because I cant get out the house at the moment and my temporary carer (15 yr old son) has gone to his mums until sunday.

I'll have to get this questionaire filled in just in case I haven't been granted a 1 month extension and then somehow I'll have to try and get it to the court on monday

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hiya Stikky

 

there wont be anyone there tomorrow so monday will have to do for the phone call, looks like the best thing would be to complete the N150 and get that in the post special delivery for tuesday with a covering letter explaining your circumstances, please anyone correct me if im wrong, im sure I had to fill in the N150 so will check my thread and get back asap with some pointers for you.

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi stikky

 

sorry just posted a thread regarding filling in N150 but it didnt work :shock: so will look for another, back later

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?191718-Advice-please-court-papers-received-Barclays-credit-card-**-CLAIM-STRUCK-OUT**/page3

 

post 54 onwards for filling the N150

 

There are also some good direction applications for box G in brassedoff thread here post 260/261 thatnks to cym

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?267627-County-Court-Claim-form-received-Cabot/page13

 

Hadituptohere

  • Haha 1

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll have a good read of those tomorrow. I'd do it now but I'm having a bit of a bad day as far as my injuries go and dont have the energy or concentration to do anything right now.

 

Thanks Hadituptohere ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right then, I've pretty much filled in the N150 but I haven't filled in the 'propoed directions' and 'other information' boxes.

I'm not too sure what to do with these and how to procede?!?!

All the direction applications I've seen are requesting the Agreement, Terms 'n conditions, notice of assignment, default notice etc etc.

The only thing I've not received is a copy of the default notice which Cabot are saying they dont need to provide because they aren't intending taking any steps detailed in section 87 (1) of the CCA 1974.

Also, regarding 'proof of amount owed', all they have said is 'You are invited to clarify'. The letters I recieved regarding all this are at post #107

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi stikky

 

Have you checked your credit file? has cabot ever recorded a default with the major Credit Reference Agencies? If they have then you need sight of the Default Notice, will have a re-read of your doc's and bob back later

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just having a quick look at your request form they have sent you as an agreement, if this is all you have then they havent supplied an CCA, id go with Cym's directions in Brassed off's thead but as pt has pointed out remove the provocating alledged :wink:, this will cover all the bases.

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A default notice is still required under CCA74 stikky so would still go with the special directions posted by cym,

 

unless anyone else has an opinion????

 

I find it hard to believe cabot have never defaulted you with the CRA's maybe its dropped off after the 6 years but it would be handy to know if it was ever there, I dont know if thats possible?

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last time I checked my report was back in 2008 and there was nothing showing then either. Having said that, if Cabot had registered a default when they first bought the account that would have gone past the 6 yr period by then also.....and having said that, I made arrangements with Cabot when they took over, and never defaulted, so then again they wouldn't have had a reason to.

 

bazaar - I have statements of the account which show when it doubled, but I have never received a proper explanation of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi stikky

 

my cabot nightmares started with Kingshill recording the defaults and Im sure that changed about 12 months after to cabot uk, the card was from around the same time as yours.

 

Dont know if theres a way of finding out if they have ever recorded defaults

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok,,, the N150 is finally completed and ready to go to the court. I'm still hoping for a 1 month extension but I'll phone and find out about that tomorrow before this form has to go in.

 

Thanks Hadituptohere - I really appreciate the help you've given me. I'd probably be sat here panicking and pulling whats left of my hair out if you hadn't :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, despite them saying the statements are not kept over 6 years , they need to supply full statements from start of agreement, and you'll get them to by order, so IMHO, you need to keep pushing the balance argument, IE, where did the 2 grand they added come from?

I would specifically tell them that you will be applying to court that they provide proof of ALL debt, so in the interests of the CPR you respectfully ask them to provide this information, otherwise they cannot substantiate their argument at court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any news on the time extension stikky?

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I would have answered earlier but didn't get an email notification somone had posted :-)

 

No, no news on the time extension. I got a friend to give me a lift to the courts and managed to hobble my way in on monday, the day the allocation questuonaire had to be in and forgot all about asking about the time extension.

I handed in the N150, filled in as per the info gained from those threads you put links to with the draft directions as in the sticky in this 'illegal issues' forum,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Quick little update.

 

I got a letter from the court a few weeks ago (Below). At the moment we're 'Stayed' until 7th December but there's mention of steps which need to be taken before November 23rd. This may seem a silly question, but am I supposed to be doing anything about this? I've not anything heard from Morgans.

 

CabotStay.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

zhi stikky that sounds to me like someone hasnt handed there AQ in (I could be wrong and i hope someone will correct me if I am), obviously not you as you went to the court and hand delivered it.

 

I dont mean to startle you but its worth ringing the court office and checking what the above notice is about as I hand delivered my Defence and recieved a strike out for not filling one........ for it to be reienstated.

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm,,,,, I'll assume it isn't me because I have had a letter from the court confirming receipt of my AQ/initial defence :-)

 

I'm curious,,,, I was just looking at my credit report and noticed Cabot Financial searched it back in July - what would they have been looking for? :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really do need to ring and find out stikky

 

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm,,,,, I'll assume it isn't me because I have had a letter from the court confirming receipt of my AQ/initial defence :-)

 

I'm curious,,,, I was just looking at my credit report and noticed Cabot Financial searched it back in July - what would they have been looking for? :wink:

 

Looking to see if you have a mortgage and whether it is worth taking action to get a charge on your property!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking to see if you have a mortgage and whether it is worth taking action to get a charge on your property!

 

Spot on!

 

Stikky, ring the court and find out if the other side have sent in an AQ, if they have then the court is asking you to either a) agree the issues unresolved prior to trial and notify the court by november 23rd or b) reach a settlement or show the "workings out" of an attempted settlement.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

Ok, I'll ring the court. There won't be anyone there on a saturday will there?

 

Assuming the other side HAS sent in their AQ, and bearing in mind I don't want to reach a settlement ( I'm going stick this out to the bitter end for better or worse), does this mean I have to send in another AQ with a final defence - as it were.

Slightly confused here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...