Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

allied international credit


karens25
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4064 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

PHZ1 means phase 1 of the call strategy we go through!wether you have a forceable credit agreement or not you will have to pay t he money back or face consequences which im sure you cant bebothered dealing with!so if i get money from you or not there are plenty of other people out there willing to enhance my bonus at the end of the month, LOVELY

 

So then if AIC are so hot on compliance, rules and reg's etc, do you reckon that they will approve of your childish comments on here.

 

After all you did say they have made an example of other people before.

 

I wonder what would happen to your super huge wage packet if they discover that you spend your working day on CAG.

 

Ummmm hunter becoming the hunted springs to mind lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey AIC why don't you tell me your name and extension number

 

and just to add you didn't get jack **** out of me either,none of you

were brave enough to set foot through my door

 

haha resident hard man hahaha, its good wen we get people like you on the phone, comedy goldif ur really from Glasgow then you will know that their is no such things as bailiffs in Scotland as its against the lawAnd why would i give u my name or extension?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bigbaldy,

 

Welcome to CAG. :)

 

I'm sure AIC would be delighted to speak to you. Maybe you could meet up for coffee as you are so close to their offices? :D (I'm sure he'd treat you as he as SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much money.)

 

DD

 

Im actually based in the Manchester office

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see they are advertising some job vacancies at the moment. I assume people are either being sacked for being too nice, or can't stomach the work.

 

You must be really glad you are in England and can threaten doorstop collections too.

 

You still haven't answered all my questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see they are advertising some job vacancies at the moment. I assume people are either being sacked for being too nice, or can't stomach the work.

 

You must be really glad you are in England and can threaten doorstop collections too.

 

You still haven't answered all my questions.

 

Just kiddin im actually in the Glasgow office, i can still adv of the possibility of baillifs if the client sees fit in England though, I cant be bothered answering all your questions to be honest, im a busy Girl

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you want to get to sleep at nightjust re read your post, that should do the trick as it just bored the life out of me! The bottom line is that i want to make money and the way i make money is to take your money so its a jungle out there and im the lion, its me or you, UNDERSTAND?!!

 

 

I read that as a threat and in so doing will request your IP address is released for further investigation.

 

Many thanks

 

Gezwee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha and in what way is that a threat, in no way is there a threat in that postCONFUSED

 

Read your post, you stated you wanted to take money by menaces...... unfortunately its against the law in this fine country in which we live.

 

There is no other interpretation of your post and it was pointedly directed to another individual on this forum

 

Its certainly not a laughing matter as (I assume) your 'Ha' implies.

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it is a threat, but that's what AIC do, and when they come on here as trolls it's only a matter of time before they start ranting at us.

 

Thanks for that, Gezwee.

 

AIC, It's not a question of your not being bothered to answer the questions, you cannot answer them "honestly".

 

I did laugh when I got the email alert about your post as it said,

"I'm a bust girl"!!!, so I assume you corrected it?

 

If you are a girl, why are you referring to yourself as a male lion? :confused:

Edited by Desperate Daniella
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bigbaldy,

 

Welcome to CAG. :)

 

I'm sure AIC would be delighted to speak to you. Maybe you could meet up for coffee as you are so close to their offices? :D (I'm sure he'd treat you as he as SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much money.)

 

DD

 

i would even pay for the coffee

 

And why would i give u my name or extension?

 

you wouldn't coz your a chicken ****. But try me and prove me wrong, just ya name will do.

Edited by Bigbaldy
Link to post
Share on other sites

i would even pay for the coffee

 

 

 

you wouldn't coz your a chicken ****. But try me and prove me wrong, just ya name will do.

 

My name is Mrs McReavy, thats all ur getting although i dont see what that is gonna achieve!Ok then lets focua on the real aspects of you owing money, im a Lioness on the prowl!And who ever keeps asking me to answer questions, i presume u are talking about that novel you posted, iv already told yo i cant be bothered reading it!As for my aledged threat, nowhere in that post do i threatenen to take the money by any means so it sounds like a little bit of Debtor paranoia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldnt bank on Mcreavy being its true identity, can't imagine Sandra would be daft enough to post on here.

 

Anyway, some good news...... called the court and the order has been approved for application on Tuesday 6th.

 

Allowing for transfer I'll get my money from AIC within 5 working days..... just a shame they had to pay the enforcement fee as well as the original order.

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4064 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...