Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

allied international credit


karens25
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4064 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all

 

My partner has also recieved a yellow card demanding payment of £1631.50 for a load he has outstanding with Black Horse (Lloyds) left over from the break up of his previous long-standing relationship. Last month he arranged with Black Horse to pay £70 per month to which they sent him a paying in book and the first payment was made on time as agreed. He received a letter from them yesterday informing him that there was an overdue payment of £10 required, but no details as to what this was payment for. He phoned Black Horse to enquire and sort it out only to be told that his loan account was now being handled by Allied International Credit UK Ltd and that he would need to speak to them. No information was given as to what this extra £10 was for and Black Horse refused to discuss anything further.

 

My partner then phoned AIC and was told that Black Horse had cancelled the agreement which was now null and void. My partner has had no notification from Black Horse as to the cancellation of the agreement and was given no reasons for it. The guy at AIC even said he had no idea what the £10 payment request was for. he said that my partner had to pay the entire sum by 5pm tomorrow or face court proceedings and the possibility of the bailiff coming to seize his van. He explained that if they did that he could not work, but I don't think it made any difference. He also explained that he doesn't have that sort of money available in a lump sum and asked if there was some sort of arrangement that could be made to which the reply was that Black Horse want their money and so the full sum is payable and non-negotiable.

 

To this end, we are unsure what we can do next. any suggestions?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cockneydruid,

 

Welcome to CAG. :)

 

There are a lot of Allied International threads and if you have a look through you'll see that AIC have one of the worst reputations out there. However, despite their threats many caggers have survived. :D And not paid them a thing. :D:D

 

Your partner does not have to pay them that money by 5.00 p.m. tomorrow.

 

He should go back to Black Horse and say that AIC have not been able to inform him about the £10 and ask why the account was sold when he had honoured his agreement with them.

 

(Unfortunately banks often do this kind of stuff because someone decides they'll get a lump sum from a DCA who'll buy it for about 10p in the £1 and then bully for the whole amount - you'll see some posts about their tactics from one of their debt collectors above, but don't let those worry you. :))

 

When was this loan taken out? Was it in just your partner's name or in joint names with his previous partner?

 

The first thing to do is ask for a copy of that agreement and he will need to send £1 to Blackhorse with a simple letter asking for a copy of the alleged credit agreement relating to that loan. There is a template letter on the site.

 

He can then tell AIC he has written to Black Horse asking for a copy of the agreement and if they have anything else to say they must put it in writing, and he will not discuss anything further on the phone with them. They do not like putting their threats in writing.

 

IF AIC were to take him to Court, which is highly unlikely, there is no way a judge would make him pay more than he can afford to pay. He would complete an income and expenditure form (which he is not obliged to provide to AIC) and he would say that he could pay the outstanding debt at xx per month which would be affordable - could be less than £70. Only a judge could order a bailiff to seize the van, and why would they do that if it meant your partner wouldn't be able to work at all? It would reflect favourably on your partner that he had made an arrangement and stuck by it, so in his position I would just continue using the paying in book and making those £70 payments on time.

 

AIC will try and bully your partner into borrowing from someone else to pay them. He is not obliged to do this, so don't let them bully you. As you'll see from their debt collector above, AIC all the way, it's them or you and they will say almost anything to get your money.

 

Anyway, let us know about the loan and we'll see where to go from there.

 

DDx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Danielle,

 

Thanks for your prompt reply, the loan was taken out in June 2007 (approx) and it was in my partner's name with his ex partner as guarantor, (which seems a bit of an irony seeing as she could not get the loan herselfpreviously due to bad credit ?)

 

When he spoke to the AIC guy yesterday he was fine to begin with, then turned suddenly suggesting that my partner basically get off the phone and start asking around friends and family for the money. He also asked if he had ever had a bailiff visit, owed money to people before and started asking if he owned a vehicle and what type etc and said how would you feel if they took the van away from you?

 

It was all very upsetting understandably,

 

As far as the £10 overdue payment goes, my partner had a statement through from Black Horse showing a load of charges that didn't make sense and he got no reply at all each time he tried to contact them.... maybe this is something to do with that, but there is no indication of what it is for on the letter. The statement arrived after his first payment had been made - even though he had been told that the £70 pm was all he needed to pay.

 

confused? us too :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, you suggest he keep making the payments to Black Horse each month as usual... if they have sold the account on to AIC, would he not have to re-negotiate the agreement with them? Sorry to be so naive, but we hve not been faced with this before :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

If she is guaranteeing it, why aren't they chasing her? Was it an amicable break-up and he is okay with repaying it because it was really all for him, or not? If not, maybe she could be asked to contribute.

 

Just stop speaking to AIC and if they ring again just tell them to put everything in writing. NEVER give them any information about your assets, or any personal information at all. They will threaten everything if you say you won't speak to them. Just ignore that.

 

When AIC don't get anywhere they'll send you back to Black Horse so just keep making the payments to them. In any case at the moment you have no proof that the debt has been sold to them, or if they are just trying to collect for Black Horse. DCAs will tell you anything to get your money. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again thanks for that.

 

My partner spoke to Black Horseand they said the account had been passed on to another agency and as such they were not allowed to discuss any of the financial aspects now that it had been passed on. They did however agree to send my partner a copy of the credit agreement and he is now informing AIC of that fact and that he no longer wishes to speak to them on the phone, but will correspond in print as advised

 

Sadly the break up was a spiteful one and solicitors were involved. He is not really ok with paying it all back himself but sadly it appears that that was the agreement or else she would stop paying the mortgage that they are both tied to and cause further misery... sadly she has really done a number on my partner and came out with the house and shiny new windows that he is now having all this aggro over :( There is no contact with her and she would do nothing to help alleviate the situation so sadly my partner is stuck with it :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with AIC is they tell you they won't accept instalments. All or nothing, or threats.

 

If I have ever been late on anything that I have wanted to pay and have been chased by a DCA I have always ignored the DCA and paid the balance to the original creditor, so he'll be okay to keep on paying Black Horse.

 

If you have had no proof in writing that the debt has been sold or assigned to AIC you shouldn't be paying them.

 

Look at the 2007 agreement and check out exactly what it says about late payments, charges and so on.

 

I'm sorry your partner has had such a rough time with his ex.

 

DDx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
must admit last month was a good month for bonus, think i will treat myself

 

Glad you won't be treating yourself from my cash- I have stopped paying MBNA / AIC as they have not responded to both my information letters

 

I ain't paying money to somoene who claims to be acting on MBNA's behalf- MBNA can't even tell me who they have passed the debt on to :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad you won't be treating yourself from my cash- I have stopped paying MBNA / AIC as they have not responded to both my information letters

 

I ain't paying money to somoene who claims to be acting on MBNA's behalf- MBNA can't even tell me who they have passed the debt on to :!:

 

 

whats your ref number and i will check ur acount for you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats your ref number and i will check ur acount for you?

 

You're missing the point- MBNA have not told me to give the money I owe them to AIC, in fact they can't tell me who they have passed it on to.

 

So, would you divulge financially sensetive details to someone who claims they are acting on behalf of the original creditor?

 

AIC can't give me proof they have been authorised by MBNA, and MBNA don't have a clue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have questions for you, AICatw.

 

When you take these accounts from an original alleged creditor, do they give you any proof that the debts are actually owed? What proof do you have in front of you before you start demanding money?

 

Also if you are asked for a proof of the debt and cannot provide it and you have been sent a £1 postal order, do you always return it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the weekends she goes out on the spending sprees with all the loot. :mad:

 

I bet she does:rolleyes:

 

More likely to be out job hunting or visiting social networking sites becuse she has no real friends, I mean in a job like that who would want to be a friend:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

AIC is probably the kind of place where they are friends with their workmates. Most people, regardless of whether or not they are struggling or very comfortable financially, would not want to be friends with a debt collector.

 

If you went to a party, or supper, with normal people I don't think most right-minded people would want to hear about how many old ladies were bullied out of their pension, how many people gave their child allowance, and so on, so I can only imagine they socialise with their workmates who would think that these were great results. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi all

 

I am from Dublin Ireland, and recently been harrassed by AIC. They have rang my dad at home putting the fright into him and then he gets onto me.

 

Then when I called them they demanded full payment of a 2250 euro debt, from and ulster bank credit card. They offered me a discount of 250 euro if i paid immidiately.

 

I am just about to send a CCA request, but I have a couple of questions and apologies of these have been answered but I cant seem to find them.

 

1) Am I covered by the same law even though I am from ireland, i.e. does the 1974 law apply to the costumer (me) or the institution (them)

2) If I send them a CCA request with a £1 PO, does it have to be registered post? Cant they say they 'lost' or didnt receive my request, if I send regular post?

 

Anyways many thanks and feedback really appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dublin, and welcome to CAG!

 

I don't know the answer to your question about Ireland and whether the CCA 1974 is the same there, but I'm sure someone will advise you soon.

 

You'll probably find the answer if and when you receive a copy of the agreement. Somewhere it should say, "Governed by the law of England and Wales" if it's compliant with UK Law. Otherwise they'll probably be some reference to Eire.

 

Where were you living when you took the credit card out? If it was in the UK it's probably issued under UK law.

 

As far as the CCA request goes I would send it by recorded delivery. It's cheaper than registered post and you can still check whether it was delivered to them.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a million.

 

I took the card out in Dublin from Ulsterbank, about 13/14 years ago.

 

I have paid it off so many times, its insane, but recently I lost my job and I am on benifits now. Until now I was paying them an amount that I agreed, but obviously I cant anymore.

 

I have tried resoning with them but they wont budge.

 

I know that if they took me to court a judge would not do anything to me as I have no means to pay them, and I have tried to agree even a small amount from my benifits with them each week, but they come across as bullies.

 

I was looking at their web site, and got on to the jobs page. They are advertising constantly for 'over the fone' debt collectors, so just to annoy them I sent in my CV, tongue in cheek like, and I urge everyone who is harrassed to do the same. I even wrote in my cover letter, that I would work for food!

 

Anyway thanks a million again

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4064 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...