Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Why is no one claiming the contractual rate of interest???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4814 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Would somebody please be so kind as to check my post here and advise me on the wording needed when filling out the N1 form with regards to claiming contractual interest?

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

which version of Excel are you using? If you don't know you can find out by opening Excel and going to Help > About Microsoft Excel. It's written at the top of the box that appears

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mindzai, thaks for getting back to me, i am using Excel 2002. Any further help will be much appreciated.

 

OK well ive tested the sheet with 2002 and it works, so there must be some other problem. Can you tell me what exactly happens when you try to open it?

 

in the meantime if you are in a rush you could download openoffice (free and good ;)) from openoffice.org and use that until we can fix the problem.

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

will be doing my spreadsheet for court claim against sh**tybank this weekend, just one last question when i calculate the compound interest, do i work it out from the date the charge was applied up to the present date i.e 1/09/2006 or only up to the date the account was cleared. all advice ,as usual, gratfully recieved.

:mad:LF53
Link to post
Share on other sites

you work it out up to the dat the claim is settled, ot today if it is ongoing. Be aware that the spreadsheet already does this for you though, though the method it uses may underestimate the amount somewhat.

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am useing the online calculator, and it has added another 1,200 to my original claim, i will do the spread sheet sunday night, ready for the court on monday.

i have been going though the account, it took 7,888 to clear a debt of 4,422. i dont think i will ever have another c/c because i never want to be associated with these tossers again.

:mad:LF53
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point, the argument of reciprocity can only be strengthened if they have already applied this rate. They'd have a hard time arguing it was unfair or unreasonable.

 

I can just see the headlines: "xxx Bank claims in court its own interest rates are unfair or unreasonable".

 

Tim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last Friday I took my completed N1 form claiming the unauthorised borrowing rate and charges from TSB.

 

I used a template letter requesting "interest at 29.8% or at the rate the court deems just". This I thought was covering me in case the higher amount was rejected.

 

The clerk explained that I could not put an exact value on my claim because I was entering two requests ( 29.8% or 8%), therefore the claim had to be submitted as "amount unspecified".

 

The potential problem this raises is that if the bank do not reply in time, I cannot be awarded an amount by default, it would still have to go before a judge to be decided.

 

Also, can I claim the same rate on my credit card as my personal account?

It doesn't appear to be an option because I am still in my credit limit .

 

Regards, Simon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SImon

 

The rate you claim has nothing to do with what you are paying.

 

Its what you are charging them for borrowing your money in the same way they charge you for borrowing theirs.

 

The rate should be based on the max your contract allows. For a cc if they dont have an over limit rate the next comparable rate for them borrowing your cash with be the cash withdrawel rate.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last Friday I took my completed N1 form claiming the unauthorised borrowing rate and charges from TSB.

 

I used a template letter requesting "interest at 29.8% or at the rate the court deems just". This I thought was covering me in case the higher amount was rejected.

 

The clerk explained that I could not put an exact value on my claim because I was entering two requests ( 29.8% or 8%), therefore the claim had to be submitted as "amount unspecified".

 

The potential problem this raises is that if the bank do not reply in time, I cannot be awarded an amount by default, it would still have to go before a judge to be decided.

 

Also, can I claim the same rate on my credit card as my personal account?

It doesn't appear to be an option because I am still in my credit limit .

 

Regards, Simon.

 

Hmm that's an interesting point, I wonder what the legal people make of this? Any comments/suggestions?

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Put your claim in for the higher rate only then unless the bank challenge your claim (which will be a 1st) thats what you should be awarded by default

 

No need, or reason, give the court a choice cos to make such a decision would require a hearing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jon

 

thats an interesting point, i have a claim which is in the fast track region in terms of value if i put two interest rates and dont have to put a final value that would allow me to keep it in fast trak.

 

However, if i show contractual interest only and put a final value then it puts it in multi track.

 

Are there likely to be any problems if i put 'amount to be decided' with the two rates, right now i dont see anything but it may be me being dense.

 

As far as having a hearing or not, im not sure this is really a problem, as far as i can make out the banks have been asking for stays where default judgements have been entered anyway or at least the abbey have and thats who im suing.

 

Doing it without specifying a final value would proably serve me well unless there are any other reasons why not, it would allow me to put a single claim in rather than two large claims the second of which the bank may well challenge if they can.

 

Glenn

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

personally - and this is just my own opinion not based on any experience - I'd do some serious research before attempting a claim that a) goes back more than 6 year, b) includes contractual interest and c) is over £5000.

 

The result the spreadsheet has given you is correct, but whether you can (and should) attempt to claim that is not something I'd like to try to answer!

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see no logical reason why the use of contracutal interest should be limited claims witin the 6 year period.

 

I can see no logical reason why the 6 year period cannot be challenged, probably with a high chance of success, and

 

finally, i can see no reason why it should be restricted to claims under 5K.

 

Having said all of that, what we all need to realise is that much of what is being, or has been done, is being done by consumers and is being settled before getting to court. So in a sense its all guess work based on a limited amount of experience compared with other parts of contract law.

 

When you add all the ingredients together, charges older than 6 years, more than 5K and contractual interest it wouldnt be surprising if it did end up in court.

 

Finally I have this morning submitted my claim with charges older than 6 years, a claim signficantly in excess of 6K (primarily interest) and claiming the contractual rate of interest.

 

Its up to you to do the reading and make yourself familiar with the legal arguments for and against each element before deciding what to do.

 

I would suggest unless you can afford a solicitor and barrister, that you dont whatever you do exceed a claim value including the interest claimed at anything over 15k.

 

That would be multi track and everything is at stake should you loose, yes I do mean everything you own.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

  • Haha 1

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about compound, here is the spreadsheet I sent them,

cc.jpg

 

Basically just took each charge, and worked out the number of days from when it was taken to current date. Where there was an interest rate change, I created a new column to reflect this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...