Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
    • Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space) guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but dont get scammed into a DMP. simply tell whomever you call to simply apply for the BS for you.  
    • totally immaterial. time to now start reading up. Programmable Search Engine (google.com) Clickme^^^ do not miss your defence filing date no matter what dx  
    • Programmable Search Engine CSE.GOOGLE.COM clickme^^
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Weightmans want me to consent to a charge!


bladeboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5634 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a letter from Weightmans today virtually bullying me into accepting a voluntary charge on my property. Along the lines of 'accept it because we'll get on anyway'. Have already CCA'd them and unfortunately they have provided a seemingly valid agreement so I was getting round to offering pro-rata payment in any case.

 

They also threaten all sorts and from the tone of the letter it seems as though they think the Red Sea will part for them in any proceedings they choose to undertake.

 

Will upload the letters here. Any thoughts on a response anyone?

 

Also attached is a financial questonnaire. To me, it appears to be massively intrusive and I don't think they're entitled to most of the information.

 

With regards to both of the above, is it a case of them 'trying it on?'

 

weightcag1.gif

 

weightcag2.gif

 

weightfin1.gif

 

weightfin2.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell them to go charge themselves.

 

If they were that certain of getting the charge then they would have gone ahead and done it already

 

can you post the CCA so we can get it checked (unless you are certain it is complient)

 

are the debts yours or joint?

 

If they are yours then your partners details are none of their business.

 

In a Income Expenditure form I would simply list money in and money out.

 

The rest of the details are none of their business.

 

This is only my opinion and I have been wrong before so wait for another opinion before acting on anythin I have said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Voluntary charge- err I don't think so.:eek: They would have to take you to court first to get a CCJ. You would then need to default on the CCJ before they could apply for a charging order- why make it easy for them? They certainly don't make your life easy so say thanks but no thanks for the offer or if you are feeling brave- Blow it out of your ar*se:D

<<<If I have helped please tickle the scales;-)<<<

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankruptcy is an empty threat in most cases - if you go bankrupt most creditors end up having to accept much less in settlement than they would get if you pay them.

 

I personally have negotiated more favourable deals with creditors using what my friend calles the blazing saddles defence (you may remember the black sherrif holding a gun to his own head and saying anyone comes near and Ill shoot)

 

Im sure there will be cases where they WILL enforce bankruptcy but my personal opinion is that they threaten it far more than it would ever be enforced by the courts and they actually want it far less than that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, went to see an insovency solicitor who explained that BK would be the best option for me.

 

The property is in roughly minus 10 grand negative equity and falling fast. I have no other assets to speak of. Car is on finance and owe more than it's worth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its hard graft fighting these bs sometimes but they can be beat,the letter i got scared me very much but after reading here i am chilled .

Do as flying says and post the CCa it might not be complient,worth a try

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you really think bankruptcy is the only way out BB, then I would write to Weightmans refusing to accept a voluntary charge, but state that you would welcome the opportunity for them to make you bankrupt, before doing this give the national debtline a call - National Debtline – Free, Confidential Debt Advice – Call 0808 808 4000 it is free and their advice is impartial......, BR really must be a last resort, and it should never be forced on anyone.

 

Write

 

Dear sirs/madam

 

Many thanks for your letter dated XXXXXX the contents of which have been noted, I will refuse a voluntary charge at this stage.

 

 

Have you any excessive charges ?

Are the defaults compliant ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The property is in roughly minus 10 grand negative equity and falling fast. I have no other assets to speak of. Car is on finance and owe more than it's worth.

 

In which case a voluntary charge or even a charging order would be meaningless.

My personal approach (but I don't like Weightmans very much) would be to let them spend as much money as possible on court fees, etc. and then go bankrupt. But you have to be very sure you are going to go bankrupt.

 

In any case a voluntary charging order is replacing an unsecured high-interest debt with a secured high-interest debt. If they want to secure the loan against your property get a binding commitment from them that all interest charges will cease.

 

If you go the other route of letting them claim in the County Court ensure you submit your income and expenditure and make a proposal for regular repayments at a level you can afford. If this is included in the judgment and (important) you keep making the repayments then you won't have to worry about a charging order. But all this is some way off yet.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In which case a voluntary charge or even a charging order would be meaningless.

My personal approach (but I don't like Weightmans very much) would be to let them spend as much money as possible on court fees, etc. and then go bankrupt. But you have to be very sure you are going to go bankrupt.

 

In any case a voluntary charging order is replacing an unsecured high-interest debt with a secured high-interest debt. If they want to secure the loan against your property get a binding commitment from them that all interest charges will cease.

 

If you go the other route of letting them claim in the County Court ensure you submit your income and expenditure and make a proposal for regular repayments at a level you can afford. If this is included in the judgment and (important) you keep making the repayments then you won't have to worry about a charging order. But all this is some way off yet.

 

 

A word of caution If the court procedure has started forr the charging order before you go BR then it may still grt pushed through, thus securing a debt that should be in the BR against the property.

 

This is obviously wrong, but i know two people it has happened too, and there faceing a brick wall with both the IS and the courts to get it overturned, so best not to let it get that far in the first place IMHO

 

Let them issue the court summons by all means but go Bankrupt before the hearing/judgement, then use that certificate as a full defence;)

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

that default only leaves 14 days between writing and action required by so is invalid as it doesnt allow time for service, the agreement does not comply with the CCA request until the T&C,s are produced so the account is still in default so cant be enforced, it states they should be overleaf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on a mo. If your property is 10k in negative equity and you have no other assets then what would BR achieve (bear in mind your property might well be sold at auction and attract a discount). The first charge is the mortgage provider, they'd take all the proceeds of the sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...