Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you have broadband at home? A permanent move to e.g. Sky Glass may not fit with your desire to keep your digibox,, but can you move the items you most want off the digibox? If so, Sky Glass might suit you. You might ask Sky to loan you a “puck” and provide access as an interim measure. another option might be using Sky Go, at least short term, to give you access to some of the Sky programming while awaiting the dish being sorted.
    • £85PCM to sky, what!! why are you paying so much, what did you watch on sky thats not on freeview?  
    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bully boys First Credit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5651 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I realise that I am one of many many people being harrassed by First Credit. My husband has been hassled by them for the last couple of years for a debt they say relates to the Bank of Scotland. He doesn't know what it is but says that he took out a number of credit cards when he was 17 so it may be one of those. He's now 32 so it was a long time ago. We keep asking for some supporting evidence and they keep ignoring us. They call all the time - lots of silent hang ups. We get about 2 letters a week - some from 1st Credit, some from LCS Solicitors and some from Bank of Scotland (they are all 1st Credit but they try and pretend they're all different organisations). The debt is £1300. We were chased a few years ago by a company called Logic for the same debt but it was only £617 then - we refused to pay and they said they wouldn't be taking it any further.

We are so very fed up. First Credit have owned this debt for almost 2years. They take a little break from contact and then bombard us again probably hoping to wear us down. We've contacted the Ombudsman who has allocated a case number to us and written to First Credit telling them thay they must address our query within 2 weeks. Do they care? Seems not as we got a phone call yesterday. Someone asked my husband if they were speaking to the right person, he said yes and they hung up. How on earth do they manage to flout the Law with impunity? We've written to them one last time giving them one last chance to drop the matter but we're so mad that we want to pursue a Civil Action. Is there any leeway here? Is it worth it?

We won't speak to them on the phone - we just hang up. What they do is tantamount to extortion. Scumbags. Will post an update asap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep welcome to the club.

i wouldn't even waste £1 to CCA them.

fire them off a telephone harrassment letter & a statue barred letter.

but dont sign them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them a CCA request to estabish is they have a valid credit agreement.

also, by the sounds of it it will more than likely be statute barred, so they have no right to pursue nyone for it anyways.

 

Just to clear things up with what you say here...The fact that a debt is statute barred does not mean anyone doesn't have the right to pursue the debt - they have every right to chase it, the money is still 'owed' it's just they can't enforce it in a court of law.

 

With that being said, it does sound as this 'debt' is statute barred Minky. If no payment has been made, nor no written acknowledgement of the debt made in the last 6 years, it is indeed statute barred.

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCA request costs a quid and personally I wouldn't give them any money. If it's statute barred then the statute barred letter is the letter you should send first.

 

Have you kept a record of these telephone calls and there frequency? Have a read here for advice on harassment http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/99376-telephone-harassment-action-plan.html?highlight=telephone

 

You should also make a complaint to the OFT under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-protection-unfair-trading/147892-complaint-about-telephone-harassment.html

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-protection-unfair-trading/147893-complaint-about-being-threatened.html

 

Regarding the harassment there are a number of laws which protect you from this. The main two are Section 40 of The Administration of Justic Act 1970 and The Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Have you reported these phone calls to OFCOM?

 

You can take 1st Credit to court for harassment but you should consult a solicitor before doing this.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clear things up with what you say here...The fact that a debt is statute barred does not mean anyone doesn't have the right to pursue the debt - they have every right to chase it, the money is still 'owed' it's just they can't enforce it in a court of law.

 

And just to clear it up even further they have the right to ask for payment but they must substantiate any debt and if you say that you are not paying a statute barred debt then that should be the end of the matter. Causing people distress and continually demanding payment is harassment.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the harassment there are a number of laws which protect you from this. The main two are Section 40 of The Administration of Justic Act 1970 and The Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

I don't beleive that this is entirely correct. The AJA was amended by the Consumer Protection Regs and this was removed. S40 now no longer applies to anything done that is a commercial practice (as defined by the cprs)

 

This means that harrassment law is now in the CPRs and the Protection From Harrassment Act '97, s3 I think. The PHA '97 goves both civil and criminal remedies, but it is fairly hard to make the criminal bit fly. As per Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead the courts will have in mind that irritations, annoyances, even a measure of upset, arise at times in everybody's day-to-day dealings with other people.

 

Criminally, there needs to be two courses of conduct.

 

The CPRs also have the problem that the conduct or harassment must significantly impair, or is likely to significantly impair the average consumer's decision to take a 'transactional decision' that they might not have taken otherwise. Pressure to pay I suppose.

 

CPRs also criminal I beleive so not much use for civil stuff unless you want to get... creative...

 

So, civil wise, an application for an injunction to prevent the contact, based on PfHA, is perhaps best bet. If they then break it, mucho fun to be had.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's also worth noting that the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection is clear that pursuing a statute-barred debt when the DCA knows that no payment will be forthcoming is an unfair practice. Yoes, it's guidance and not law, but compliance is a condition of the consumer credit licence that a DCA needs.

 

Secondly, the CSA (Worst Cretin's MD is the chairman) have a code of practice that requires members to act at all times within the law and regulatory rules. In the past this was just window-dressing, but the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 considers that failing to comply with a code of practice that a company has subscribed to is unfair trading, for which they can be prosecuted.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

just thought i'd post an update. We received a letter from Connaught Collections recently saying that they intended to issue a statutory demand and make us bankrupt. I sent an official letter of complaint to 1st credit, quoting our Ombudsman case number (as we've already opened a case with them about this).

This morning we got a letter from 1st credit. It goes like this:-

 

"Thank you for your letter. Our cllient, Halifax, Bank of Scotland has been unable to furnish us with the original credit agreement pursuant to your request. We have closed our files in relation to this debt but reserve the right to reopen our files should our client, in the future, provide the original agreement"

 

We have written back saying that this is unacceptable and we want confirmation that no further action will ever be taken again. They've been threatening us for almost 3 years to recover this debt so we just want them to go away and never come back. If they won't write it off, we'll refer to the Ombudsman. I am almost positive that the Ombudsman would find in our favour. 1st Credit have treated us appalingly.

 

I'll let you know what happens.

 

Liz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...