Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
    • Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have.
    • go do a Direct Debit Guarantee Clawback to your bank if you've now got control of his bank account finny.
    • Hello, Just to check I understand things right, he moved to a nursing home, you then kept paying the rent for a period of time whilst you sorted his belongings. You have asked to give notice and asked for backdated payments of rent from when you first asked which went ignored? They are still taking rent payments.   Have I understood correct?   If I've got anything wrong please correct me.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fraud & Security issue at work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5660 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'll explain this in basic details.

 

I logged some claim for overtime through the internal work system. However, I had not worked any of those hours.

 

i did not think they would get authorised anyway.

 

They did.

 

I resigned and wrote a letter stating that I am willing to pay the money back asap.

 

However, a senior manager has started a factfind investigation and disciplinary hearing.

 

Now, I've handed my cheque into union. But the manager has stated that he wants me to respond to the allegation of fraudulenty claiming overtime for hours not worked.

 

In an earlier letter, i already explained the whole situation.

 

He is threatning me or scaring my by saying, "I want to deal with it in-house, but If i don't get a response to the allegation, I will have to take it to Fruad & Security"

 

I just want to know even if he did take it to F&S, will they bother pursuing me despite the fact that Ive already handed a cheque in for the amount and made a payment.

 

Advice much needed please

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've resigned, you're not an employee... How can they discipline you??! :confused:

 

You've repaid the money in full too, so that should be the end of it shouldn't it?? What can F&S pursue for if paid back what you "stole"?

 

I'm sorry, but I can't help but feel there's more to this than you're saying. I think you need to go back to the Union and explain what's happening, contacting ACAS might be an idea too...

Acas - How can we help?

 

Good luck with it - Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to know even if he did take it to F&S, will they bother pursuing me despite the fact that Ive already handed a cheque in for the amount and made a payment.

 

Hola Pablo

 

For me there are three distinct issues here:

 

1) If the company pursued you through the civil courts then any likely award would be to compensate them for their actual loss i.e. the amount you have paid them back by cheque. Thus, this route would seem unlikely considering you have paid this now.

 

2) By F & S, I presume you mean some kind of criminal sanction? If so, I doubt the CPS would pursue a prosecution in a matter such as this - would that really be in the public interest?

 

3) If you are accused of a disciplinary offence whilst at work, and then resign before the internal disc process is completed, then the company has an obligation to allow you to have your disc case heard. Thus they may be saying they want to continue the process for this reason.

 

Thus, write back to them, making it clear that you waive your rights to attend any disc hearing and that you will not participate in any disc investigation because you have resigned and admitted the offence.

 

At least then the company are covered from a future allegation from you that they commenced a disc process and did not offer you a fair process etc

 

That should sort it.

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've resigned, you're not an employee... How can they discipline you??! :confused:

 

Because the senior manager is unwilling to accept my resignation

 

He rang me and said because of this matter, I am going to proceed with a factfind, and disciplinary hearing etc as If im a normal member of staff.

 

Also, hes actually stated that I've been non-adherent to my shift because I've not come in for my normal shift hours after I've resigned

Edited by Pablo1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not paid them YET. However, I have said from day 1, I will pay them immediately.

 

I have been co-operating.

 

I told them from Day 1 that i will pay monies back immediately.

 

What annoys me is the fact that the investigating manager is always reluctant to express any communication in writing.

 

Now, he has said to me over the phone, that when I make the payment, and submit a response in writing to the allegations, he will deal with the matter "in house".

 

However, my union have advised me to ask him to send an email to myself as well as a letter to state that "upon receipt of payment and letter, X company will not be taking this matter further"

 

However, he keeps saying isn't my word good enough and I just don't trust this manager.

 

Now, Im going to ring the manager tomorrow and say that the cheque is in my hand and ready to send to union, but before that I want an email or letter to myself or union stating that when i make a payment, this is the end of the matter.

 

Also, another thing that has annoyed me is that, one of the team managers there explained my situation to a fellow colleague...Im going to ring him tomorrow and say I'm not happy with this leak. I know this because a friend rang me and enquired about this.

 

I agree with you elche, why would Internal Fraud and security want to puruse matter when im willing to pay because it'l be more hassle to them.

 

However, this manager is awkward and he's ****ed off because he didn't get to sack me because I resigned

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, my union have advised me to ask him to send an email to myself as well as a letter to state that "upon receipt of payment and letter, X company will not be taking this matter further"

 

Sounds like good advice to me

 

Best of luck

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

im awaiting an email confirming the above.

 

However, i will include your quote in my letter: you waive your rights to attend any disc hearing and that you will not participate in any disc investigation because you have resigned and admitted the offence. Although may change the admitted the offence bit

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...