Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Morgan Stanley CCA- received Barclaycard terms in response**WON, THEN WON AGAIN!!!**


noomill060
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5482 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 268
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh dear, just tried to use my card, 'twas refused.

 

 

Unlawful Recission of Contract?

 

 

It amazes me how petty minded and amateur some of these organizations are, with all there money and legal expertise on tap surely they realise the correct way to cancel a card:???:

 

Go get em noomill!! :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

congrats :)

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Repudiation- yikes!

 

The only info on repudiation I can find relates to the 7 year leasing of an oil tanker in 1998, where damages were sought by the ship owner after the hirers handed the boat back due to errrrr.... local difficulties in the Persian Gulf area after 9/11.:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

what does formatting mean, steven? I note you have cagbotted my POCs.

 

Hi noomill060,

 

Did the CAGbot supply a satisfactory explanation for his 'Edit' work on your POCs??

 

I do hope the wave continues towards Barclaysharks!!

 

Finally thank you for all your help, great support and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the LBA wot I wrote.

 

It is NOT endorsed by CAG in any way.

 

 

 

address

date

 

Barclaycard Cashback.

 

a/c number:

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

Sir/Madam,

I write in connection with the above account.

On 30 September 2008 I sent Barclaycard a request for a true copy of my credit agreement under s78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. (The Act)

As of the date of this letter, there has been no response to this request. I am thus of the opinion that no such document exists and that under s.127 (3) of the Act, this account is unenforceable.

I am also of the opinion that any penalty charges and PPI premiums, for which you would assert that I gave consent to by signing any alleged agreement, are void and unenforceable as you are unable to substantiate any claim that such consent was given, if indeed such penalty charges were fair and lawful, and PPI correctly sold at the outset, which I assert they were not.

In the alternative, I will assert that the PPI premiums debited were as a result of miss selling, as outlined in an earlier letter (currently the subject of a complaint to the Financial Services Ombudsman. Should legal action become necessary, the FOS will be informed) and that the amount of the penalty charges levied for breach of contract are not proportionate, do not represent a true pre-estimate of your costs, and are unfair and unenforceable.

Although this account may be unenforceable by you, the creditor, I am of course entitled to seek reimbursement for such sums which were added to the debit balance unfairly or unlawfully and for any and all interest levied thereon.

I therefore give notice that as of 8 November I require reimbursement in the sum of £583.65, this being the amount of:

a) PPI premiums relating to insurance which I believe was miss sold

b) unfair/unlawful penalty charges

and all interest subsequently unlawfully levied thereon, at the compound contractual rate.

Settlement to be in the form of a cheque/bankers draft or cash.

A schedule of these premiums and penalty charges is attached to this letter.

Naturally, interest is accruing on this this figure at the contractual compound rate of 20.9% per annum.

Should you wish to settle before legal action is started, please add a further amount, equivalent to the daily rate pertaining to this account, for each day after 8 November 2008. Please allow a further 10 days interest to cover time taken for delivery of your cheque and it’s clearance through BACS.

 

 

 

You do not have my consent to disclose any of my personal information, nor can you substantiate any claim to the contrary by production of a properly executed credit agreement in the required form and content.

It would appear that by doing so you are committing an offence under s.174 of the Act.

174 Restrictions on disclosure of information

(1) No information obtained under or by virtue of this Act about any individual shall be disclosed without his consent.

(5) Any person who discloses information in contravention of this section commits an offence.

 

 

 

I therefore additionally require written agreement from you, that

a) the account is unenforceable at law and that you have written it off with a £zero balance

b) you will not contact me in an attempt to recover (either as original creditor, nor by assigning the account to any third party) any sum which you may consider owing under this account

c) you will cease processing my personal data to third parties

d) you will not start to process my personal data to third parties

e) all personal data relating to myself in this account, processed to third parties, (including, but not limited to, Experian, Call Credit and Equidebt) will be permanently removed, or any balance permanently set to zero, with the word “Settled”

 

 

Failure to comply with the above requests within 14 days will result in legal action to enforce my rights under the Data Protection Act 1998, a request for a declaration under s.142 of CCA 1974 that the account is unenforceable and a claim for all damages suffered, all court fees and interest pursuant to the County Courts Act 1984.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Edited by noomill060
My legal training consists only of modules of a BTEC HND, taken in the mid 1980s in Bolton. Seek qualified legal advice
Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not in the profession- just two and a bit years reading all I can on CAG.

 

Hi noomill060,

 

Apprentice of the year! certainly time well spent thats for sure.

 

Thank you for posting these up for all to see, so reassuring to know what is to come.

 

Hope CAGbot doesn't edit these POC's away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Greetings all.

Just wanted to say, as a newbie to this incredible site and context, that this thread, although about a different aspect of BC's behaviour to that which currently afflicts me, is truly and wholeheartedly inspiring. :D

 

Way to go, noomill060 ... man, I just love to see points so well put and elaborated, great stuff! It is wierdly hilarious (and rather sad, in a way) to see the Respondent's staff appearing to lamely 'flail their arms' at the end to pretend to defend against honesty and logic. The letters from BC towards the end are ... well, words fail me. It's so appalling, their whole approach ... grrrrrrrr!:x Makes me as mad as the Monty Python chef (Cleese). [Picks up cleaver, contemplates famous brand].

 

It beggars belief that their behaviour is not properly prosecuted by the regulatory authorities, though in the current climate why am I so surprised. :lol: Regulators? I could regulate better down the pub with one hand tied behind my back!

 

*T*H*A*N*K* *Y*O*U* one and all herein for enabling and empowering me to start my fight back against Barclaycard.

Catch you in my thread ... :-):-):-)

 

Lamplighter.

Edited by LampLighter
Avoidance of risk of libel action due to charged emotional state.

"Do just once what others say you cannot do, and you will never pay attention to their limitations again." - Arthur C. Clarke.

"Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path." - Psalms 119:105

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A few weeks ago I wrote to the court asking that the claim be withdrawn but with liberty to apply, just in case.

 

 

Barclays have failed to honour their offer of settlement.

 

They have not removed any negative data and mark it as settled. The account is still marked as having missed payments, being overlimit and with a large amount owing.

 

I will be applying to the court to reopen the claim and for an award for damages due to promissory estoppel, repudiation of contract and also an award for damages under s.13 DPA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I will be applying to the court to reopen the claim and for an award for damages due to promissory estoppel, repudiation of contract and also an award for damages under s.13 DPA.

 

Oh dear, you have given me a few things to read up on :confused:

 

Good luck noomill and thank you for taking the time to share this with us so we may all benefit from your efforts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just waiting for a CRA to answer an innocent query, as answer by law they must...

 

Then, carpe jugulam- behold, I am become the slayer of worlds.

 

 

 

 

 

(Well, ok, I write a strongly worded letter to the court again) :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goodness!!! I have read from beginning to end and am 'disappointed' in Barclaycard's actions - not in the least surprised though!!!!!!!!!!!

 

I have got 1/2 way through your process having just received illegible application form with 'Blue Peter' T&C.

 

Will be referring to your storyboard for some time to come

 

Keep up the good work, am sure there are plenty more MS/Goldfish/Barclaycrud 'victims' receiving the same letters as you

 

Thanks again for your detail - WE WILL WIN IN THE END - KEEP STRONG!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant say too much at the mo, but the Mecanno cogs are now turning.

 

Sorry noomill060 didn't realise you were still having to deal with this.:mad:

 

My barclayshark thread can wait, after all its 'all we hold' ha ha.:)

 

Be lucky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Noomill, just read your thread and it's really inspired me to get on with my recalim for PPI.

I never actually asked for it, (even the box is ticked NO) but they charged me anyway.

My question is can you let me know what spreadsheet you used to work out the interest.

I thought seeing as you'd been successful i would ask you. I'm sooooo confused by the whole compund interest thingy.

Thankyou

Livis xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...