Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
    • you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok.   dx  
    • Are Resident car parks subject to Planning permission under Town and Country Planning {control of Advertisements ] Regulations? SCHEDULE 1CLASSES OF ADVERTISEMENT TO WHICH PARTS 2 AND 3 DO NOT APPLY Class A "1.  The advertisement is not readily visible from outside the enclosed land or from any place to which the public have a right of access." As a private residential site does the public have a right of access? This particular Act has so many caveats that even many Councils do not understand it and that includes me. Though I do understand it better than many council planning departments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I won a Set Aside hearing in August against HSBC on the grounds that the Judgment shouldn't have been obtained because there's no CCA in existence. N265 now?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2195 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks

 

I won a Set Aside hearing in August against HSBC on the grounds that the Judgment shouldn't have been obtained because there's no CCA in existence. The Judge ordered Standard Disclosure by List of either party to the other by 3 Oct, with inspection by 10 Oct, and statements of evidence to be adduced at final hearing to be exchanged by either party by 31 Oct. As I had already provided my bundles containing all this, I thought I didn't have to comply with this as they already had it all, and believed that I should just wait and see if the other side produced the Agreement (which they've admitted they don't have, so I thought I was in the clear). So I didn't send anything. The other side didn't either.

 

Now I'm beginning to wonder if I had it wrong, and have messed up the whole thing by not complying. I'm preparing to write and send the list and the statement anyway, though it's now really late. Can anyone tell me whether I should or not? Have I ruined my case? If there's no Agreement, I have assumed that HSBC can't do much anyway, and neither can the Court, as it's unenforceable, full stop. But I'm afraid there might be something I don't know.....

 

Many thanks

 

Sirensinger

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you haven't ruined your case but you should and still can make disclosure of documents by completing Form N265.

 

Once the list has been completed send a copy of it over to the court and another to the opponent. When sending a copy of it to the opponent put them on notice by saying this in your covering letter:

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re (name) v (name) Case Number (Case Number)

 

Please find attached my list of documents in Form N265 in compliance with the order made (date). You will already have had sight of these documents since they are those documents disclosed and copied to you in support of my application to set aside judgment and heard on (date).

 

I note on the other hand that in breach of the order you have failed to disclose your list of documents to me which in turn has prohibited the completion and exchange of witness statements due for exchange on 31 October. Further delay on your part will not be tolerated. Please ensure you comply with your disclosure obligations by not later than 7 days from date of this letter.

 

Within 7 days of receipt of your list I will then seek copies and/or make arrangements to inspect the original documents at a place of convenience. I suggest the mutual exchange of witness statements takes place 7 days after copies have been supplied by you to me.

 

Take notice that if you should fail to provide me with a copy of your list of documents or allow further slippage in the court timetable I am likely to make an application to the court for an appropriate order without further notice to you.

 

I look forward to hearing from you by return of post.

 

y/f

 

Any queries just yell.

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, SurfaceAgent, are you still around? Or can anyone else help? This might not make a lot of sense, as I'm totally lost here, but I'm desperate for advice..... it's a bit long, sorry.

 

In my last post I mentioned that I'm late with a Standard Disclosure through believing the Judge's directions only applied to the other side (DG Sols for HSBC), as I'd supplied all my evidence but they have failed to supply the Consumer Credit Agreement. At the time I thought DG hadn't met the deadline for disclosure either, but now I've been told they've sent a load of stuff to my previous temporary address - don't know what yet, awaiting a phone call. I don't know if they did it before the deadline or not, but I guess now they'll try to use my missing it to get my Statement struck out, which is what it says on the form can happen if you miss the deadline. I don't know if there's anything I can do about this, except plead ignorance, which seems rather wet!!

 

But also, though I said at the Set Aside Hearing (which was recorded) that I had gone back to live at my original address, both DG and the Court have sent documents to the other address - and I only recently found out that the Court sent an order saying that they wanted to consolidate HSBC's case against me with my case against them, so that the directions given at the Set Aside Hearing would apply to both. It said DG Sols had to respond confirming that the two cases relate to the same credit card by 10 Oct.

 

Then they made another order varying the date for DG to respond by to 21 Nov. It didn't say anything about a change to the dates for Standard Disclosure tho.

 

I am now hopelessly confused - I have to get my pre-trial checklist in by Friday, and of course I haven't yet complied with what it asks, and am a month late anyway! I don't yey know if DG Sols have responded to the Court agreeing to the consolidation - if so, then I don't see how I can complete the Standard Disclosure or the pre-trial thingy yet, as I'll need to get my evidence together for my claim for return of charges as well as the rest. Oh, and apparently there is a date for the trial of 5th January.

 

Is there anything I can do to get more time allowed or something? I just can't get my head round all this and am still thinking I've blown it. I can't decide whether to write to the Court and explain, and ask for clarification, whether there's a form for this sort of situation or what? I don't even know how detailed the Disclosure stuff should be, is it just a simple list of what I've sent in my bundle - but if so, thaty's on my Statement anyway! Or do I have to list each letter with dates, and the same for the case law?

 

If anyone can make any sense of it I'd be so grateful for a bit more help,

 

Thanks

 

Sirensinger

Link to post
Share on other sites

First, if ever you change address during the course of litigation you mus file at court and serve on all parties a notice of your change of address for service. This can be in simple letter form, but until you file and serve notice of the change the proper and only address at which documents may be served will be the old address.

 

So get that done first thing.

 

Secondly, you should complete your list of documents as we discussed earlier.

 

Thirdly, get hold of the stuff which was sent to your old address over the weekend and when you've got it, study it and if there are any queries ask here.

 

Fourthly, don't worry too much about the checklist right now. Get on with the suggestions above, but get on with them quickly. up date the position you are in on Monday or Tuesday next week. After that, we can consdier the position in terms of the preparation of your witness statement.

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SurfaceAgent, & many thanks for yr help.

 

I got the N265 on Wed, & returned it Fri, along with my list & the Checklist - only problem is thingsve been so fraught as I had another case on Fri plus a work deadline, I think I've forgotten to send the Opponent a copy! But will remedy this over weekend. I now have their Disclosure, will look at it tonight.

 

Just been looking at another thread where you've helped someone with a similar case to mine, where the CCA is lacking - & gleaned some v useful info for my case I think. I shall post here again in a couple of days once I know what's in the other side's Disclosure.

 

Am learning a lot about the Law, & it's been most interesting, esp your informative posts - just wish I could learn faster! I would very much like your help with my other Case, in which I was only partially successful yestserday when I thought it was cut & dried. I don't want to confuse this thread, so I will start another thread here under 'Sirensinger's other Case' - could you have a look at that one as well if you have time, please?

 

Thanks again!

 

Sirensinger

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 9 years later...

HELP i HAVE DONE A DISCLOSURE LIST WITHOUT FILLING IN THE N265 FORM. NOW THE OTHER SIDE ARE SAYING I HAVENT ADHERED TO THE JUDGES RULING. CAN MY CASE BE THROWN OUT. CAN THEY ASK FOR MY EVIDENCE TO BE STRUCK OUT OR EVEN STIKE OUT ALL THE CASE. THE OTHER SIDE ARE STILL REQUESTING THE DOCUMENTS. WHAT IMPACT CAN ALL THIS HAVE ON MY CASE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to I won a Set Aside hearing in August against HSBC on the grounds that the Judgment shouldn't have been obtained because there's no CCA in existence. N265 now?
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2195 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...