Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My tobacco got a customs charge: Will I have to pay it? It's an odd one...


mantisinc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5698 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I'm sure you can help me on this one, you guys generally seem to be pretty clued up :D

 

Basically, I bought some tobacco (not much at all - 5 x 50g pouches golden virginia) from Europe.

 

Came today, with a customs stick on it for £41.80. Now, it says on that that the parcel can not be delivered until all charges are paid. However, the postie just gave the parcel to me as he ususally does, and walked off. (I didn't realise the charge until he'd gone).

 

Because he didn't collect any payment, will they chase me up for it?

 

It's not a huge amount so I'm not fussed either way, but would be nice to know.

 

Here is a photo:

 

tacky.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have had a card left asking you to pay the £41.80 + £8.00 handling fee (unless that's already included in the £41.80) before they would deliver it.

 

If you haven't received one then I imagine it's an oversight on Royal Mail's part. If they've delivered it without asking for a fee then I doubt they've kept a record. If you wanted to, you could notify them of their error and pay the fee.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, well literally the postie (royal mail) just gave it to me like a normal parcel, just the parcel on it's own - and when he'd gone I realised there was that sticker on the front saying there was a customs charge.

 

I guess it's their loss if they didn't collect the payment from me?

 

 

If I wanted to? Don't be silly :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming that the customs charge is correct, this seems a very expensive way to buy tobacco;

you buy 5x50g pouches of golden virginia costing about £30 online,add to that the shipping charges plus this extortionate customs charge it seems that you are paying about £15 per 50g pouch when it costs just over £11 per 50g pouch in my local Tesco!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It worked out at £30 in total, including the shipping. Which basically saved me £30 or so (they are ususally are £12 a pouch.)

 

But as for the customs charge, obviously I wasn't expecting one at all. With it - then yes - it sure is an expensive way to buy tobacco :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just looked up one of these online tobacco companies websites FAQ's

quote;

Q; Are the products taxed ?

A; All our boxes of tobacco display an EU country government seal which guarantees that the contents are genuine and that all taxes and duties have been paid to an EU government authority.

Q; Is it legal ?

A; Absolutely! since all our products are EU taxed you and every EU citizen may freely buy our products without having to pay any extra taxes or duties in the country of residence,if you reside in a country that is a member of the EU you have a great advantage ! one of the major reasons for the very formation of the EU is the free movement of goods between member countries.

(That is until good old British customs and excise come along that is !!)

So who is correct here ? anyone know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but the information on their website doesn't tell the full story.

 

The ECJ ruled 2 years ago that only goods transported personally by private individuals are exempt from excise duty - so anything bought online or mail order is subject to excise duty when it arrives in the UK.

 

Court rules against dropping tax on alcohol and tobacco bought online | Business | The Guardian

BBC NEWS | World | Europe | EU alcohol ruling cheers traders

Link to post
Share on other sites

HMRC are right, the trader is wrong.

 

Alcohol and tobacco products from within the EU cannot be sent to the UK unless arrangements have been made to pay UK excise duty in advance. On this occasion the OP has been charged the excise duty, but as there are special requirements concerning importing tobacco, then HMRC could have seized the goods.

 

To import tobacco you should use Registered Excise Dealers and Shippers (REDS), although I imagine the cost in doing so would probably end up a similar kind of cost to just buying the tobacco in the UK unless you're importing large quantities.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...