Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
    • OK. Thank you all for the input.  I'll ignore their letters of demand but NEVER ignore a letter of claim. I'm bracing myself for the stress as their demands £££ goes up and the case gets sent to debt collectors. 
    • OK.  It was worth a try. Their case is still pants and they have broken their own Code of Practice numerous times.
    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

firstplus ppi can I claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5562 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well so far I have had the 1st fob off letter telling me that they would not uphold my claim and do not believe that they mis-sold. Then wrote back as they had not answered all points raised by my first letter. I also pointed out that the first telephone recording they sent referred to an earlier conversation which they had not sent to me following my SAR's.

I received a reply saying they would reply in full by 24/2/09, then today another saying my claim has been referred to thier Senior Managers and when they get the information they need they will write to me. Should be no later than 2/3/09.

Anyone else had this sort of reply?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Standard Letter in the first part.

 

You have to be aware that unless you send the letter direct to a named individual the complaint gets logged in summary into the "Respond CenterPoint – Complaint Management System"

 

Basically if you send it to Complaints Department. Some jobsworth will enter it in as "Mr Complained about mis -sold policy"

 

What it seems here is that they are now taking task on the entire contents of the letter, due to the AMOUNT of complaints being raised for issues not being addressed.

 

The letters they are sending are most definetly pre defined:

 

4 Week Hold

8 Week Hold

 

Letters, I noticed on my SAR and this was confirmed by one of our whistleblowers that these HOLD letters are entered into the diary at the same time. Which is just wrong.. they really should deal with each complaint in full and only issue hold letters if it is required.

 

Software Used By FIRSTPLUS: http://www.cdcsoftware.com/en/Customers/A-to-Z-Listing.aspx?name=Barclays

Edited by incipience

Support the Cause and Fight Firstplus Google "First Plus Complaints"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have recieved a reply from Firstplus today. The letter in brief they feel that we were provided with good enough information to make an informed decision about taking the policy. Nevertheless senior managers have considered the complaint and are willing to to reach an agreement in an attempt to reach a mutually agreeable outcome.

They are concerned that we are unhappy with the remaining cover and should we choose to cancel the policy they would like to offer an enhanced rebate. This is calculated on a pro-rata basis of 78% of the insurance premium.

The offer takes into account the time the policy has provided us with cover (20 months) and the rebate is calculated on the unexpired term remaining (40 months).

This would mean an amount of £3324.95 would be applied to our account in additrion to the normal rebate of £2262.44 payable on cancellation of the policy.

They point out that this additional refund is made with no admission of liability by either the insurers or Firstplus and is purely a gestur of goodwill. They request that we confirm acceptance of the offer in writing at our earliest convenience.

This letter is to be considered thier final response in relation to this matter, however, they must inform us that should we dissatified we have the option to ask the FOS to review our complaint.

 

Can one of the experts out there please give me some advice as to what they consider to be the next best course of action.

Thanks.;):?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Varda, sorry, was going to reply earlier, however these sort of discussions on a public Forum that FIRSTPLUS will no doubt be visiting, really would prejudice your case.

 

I am part of the "Firstplus Complaints" Forum and we note Firstplus popping in and reading our forums each day, so we had to secure it.

 

I will say you have many options and dont even consider the FOS as you will be waiting at least a year.

  • Haha 1

Support the Cause and Fight Firstplus Google "First Plus Complaints"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...