Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know.
    • Looks similar to you original email to their Complaints team. I dont rate copypasta for a CEO complaint. Rewrite it with emotion involved as to how badly this is affecting you and make them feel embarrassed for their actions... 
    • Well, not quite the trouncing they deserve, and Andy Street suffering - despite distancing himself from the poops and being a good mayor (and despite the rather ridiculous muslim voter labour boycott across regions - did they really want the tories to stay in power?) - But not bad at all The Reformatory goons managed two council seats didn't it - out of over 300 they tried for ..     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA Help


Foxknowe
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5681 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have sent 10 requests all nearing the 12 working day limit, so far Capital One are the only one to reply and they only sent me a leaflet of their standard terms and conditions and to advise me I am in arrars and not paid!!

 

I have read through the other threads and there are some templates I have stumbled across (not sure of the codes).

 

Can somebody please provide me with the definate template we are using.

 

Also it seems that some of the letters are basicaly saying I will not pay any more, while others are advising I am entitled to my money back (if unenforceable).

 

What is the procedure I am a bit confussed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion the time limits are to be ignored, especially as it is no longer an offence for the creditor not to supply the agreement when asked.

 

For Capital One, I would write back saying that what they have supplied is not a true copy of the agreement therefore you await a proper copy in due course.

 

For all of them, just sit back and wait. Once the 12 days are up, you can legitimately stop paying, but personally I wouldn't write to chase them up. They know the law and it's up to them to comply. They will of course eventually notice that you've stopped paying and write to you with the usual threats, and that is the time to remind them of their obligations.

 

The reason I say this is that if you write chasing them up it just gives them more incentive to have a good hunt around for your agreements sooner rather than later. If you need a 'payment holiday' whilst you get other things sorted out, then they're providing an ideal opportunity.

 

If any of the companies are eventually unable to provide a copy of your agreement, you are not obliged to pay any more to them and could, in theory at least, ask for anything you have paid to be returned. I don't personally know of anyone who has successfully done this though, and it's not something I would do.

 

No agreement or an unenforceable agreement does not make the debt go away, it just means that they can't take court action. If you do stop paying you do need to be aware that they will still keep updating your credit reference file which could have quite serious consequences if your file isn't already trashed.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks RMW, what confusses me is we have fellow members who seem to have challenged these lenders and recovered funds, how can this happen?

 

I actually stumpbed across the websire when doing some research on the validity of Cartel Review advertising that they could get my money back. I think the common though is they are a [problem], however, more and more of these companies are showing up......is there something in it???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why pay them to do something which you can do yourself with the help of this forum?

 

Over getting your money back, I believe that it is called 'restitution' and that you would argue that you made payments in the mistaken belief that an enforceable agreement existed. It would almost certainly end up in court and you would need to be confident that you understood the issues involved to take it that far.

 

The reason I haven't even contemplated doing this myself is that, in most cases, I accept that I did borrow the money so whilst legally I might be entitled to get all my payments back, morally I just wouldn't do it.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...