Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wow thats incredible. Thank you so much
    • If the purchaser denies having received it then sue P2G. If you simply don't hear anything more from the purchaser then you have the purchaser's name and address – and frankly for £48 I would go ahead and sue. As long as you have good proof of delivery then your chances of success are probably better than 95% and frankly the purchaser would probably put their hands up as they would effectively be being sued for the civil equivalent of theft. I wouldn't let it go if I were you. It would be a good exercise for you and gives you confidence the next time something comes up which is may be much more valuable
    • Thank you again Emmzzi for your insight. Not only did I do the work, but as a maths tutor delivering financial literacy workshops under the Govt Multiply project, the college were paid £400 for each student I recruited, which makes it an even bigger kick in the teeth! I spoke to Citizens Advice Bureau on Friday who advised me to go back to ACAS for advice and assistance, as ACAS are the experts in employment matters. They did also mention small claims court, as being more straightforward and less complex, but surely their solicitor would just contest this and I would lose the £80 court fee? If I did submit a claim through the small claims court, would I just leave the employment tribunal running until the outcome? The deadline for me to submit my schedule of loss is tomorrow, so I will submit today so that they cannot hold me in breach.
    • Ive just checked the tracking again and its actually out for delivery today! Anyway,  I refunded the buyer on Ebay off my own back on the 2nd of June they havent opened a case or anything like that so surely i cant take action against either the buyer or P2G/ Evri can i ? Id hope the buyer would see fit and pay but you know what people are like these days ... Once its delivered I'll send him a polite message asking for payment but i suspect there'll be no reply      
    • Thanks for this update. Let's not if you have any more difficulty – in particular if you have difficulty getting paid back from the purchaser. We can help you either against the parcel delivery courier or against the purchaser
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

is this a cca?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5720 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Been busy this morning as you all can see with all the threads I ve been posting:eek:

 

Advice on this one please!

 

Its the friend that I m helping out, she's in trouble with amex/rma too.

 

She cca amex/rma and this is what they send back

 

oops..........having trouble with photobucket, might have over worked it:eek:

 

Will post later

follow the light!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Sorry TC keeping you waiting;) lol!

 

Here it is

 

th_014.jpg

 

 

Also can someone tell me, the application was signed on 27/7/99 and on the top of the form it was approved on 7/6/99. should that be right?:confused:

follow the light!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would say its not enforcable as it doesn't contain the correct terms and conditions required.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If someone else is willing to confirm that it is not worth the paper it was written on then I would be asking payplan to stop the payments to them, as it is not a valid agreement.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where are the Prescribed Terms ? Also Terms and Conditions from the time it was taken out ? as mentioned earlier.

Could it have been approved and then sent to your friend to sign and accept, thus explaining the date difference.

From others I have seen on here I would say it is what it says at the top of the page ............ Application Form :)

Sorry can't be much more help.

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If someone else is willing to confirm that it is not worth the paper it was written on then I would be asking payplan to stop the payments to them, as it is not a valid agreement.

 

 

Anyone have any advice on how to get confirmation?:(

follow the light!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where are the Prescribed Terms ? Also Terms and Conditions from the time it was taken out ? as mentioned earlier.

Could it have been approved and then sent to your friend to sign and accept, thus explaining the date difference.

From others I have seen on here I would say it is what it says at the top of the page ............ Application Form :)

Sorry can't be much more help.

 

Pete.

 

 

Hi Pete and all

 

My friend said it was such a long time she can't remember was it approved then send to her to sign.

She said when she requested the cca thats all amex/rma send back and this letter attached

th_015.jpg

follow the light!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just nicked this off 42man from amother thread, you could use this to get you started.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/163432-natwest-created-cca-my.html#post1755058

 

 

Pete.

 

 

Thanks Pete, will send off in the morning:D x

follow the light!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response to my request under the Consumer Credit Act section 78.

 

I am pleased to see that you confirm this as a true copy of the original agreement executed by yourselves on the XXXXX.

 

As you must realise this agreement does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer credit Act and is therefore unenforceable under section 127(3) of the same act.

 

 

You had until (date here) what's the correct date to put down when I m sending it off on 10/10/08? to provide me with the true copy I requested. After that date you entered into default of my request and I am therefore advising that the matter is now in dispute . Whilst the matter is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, make any further charges to the account or pass the account to anybody else.

Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

 

 

 

follow the light!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response to my request under the Consumer Credit Act section 78.

 

I am pleased to see that you confirm this as a true copy of the original agreement executed by yourselves on the XXXXX.

 

As you must realise this agreement does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer credit Act and is therefore unenforceable under section 127(3) of the same act.

 

 

You had until (date here) what's the correct date to put down when I m sending it off on 10/10/08? to provide me with the true copy I requested. After that date you entered into default of my request and I am therefore advising that the matter is now in dispute . Whilst the matter is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, make any further charges to the account or pass the account to anybody else.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

would 4th November 2008 be ok? giving it 21 days + 2 days for recorded delivery.

 

Any advice please?:)

follow the light!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the date that they should have provided the first cca for you, 12+2 days from when you originally sent the letter.

 

Pete.

 

Oh .............I see what you mean, another thing I have learned.

 

Thanks:D

follow the light!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TC

 

Nope, just that!

 

The reason I ask is that it seems to say under SIGN TODAY

 

"Personal Information- Before signing this application it is important that you read the paragraphs set out overleaf" or similar?

 

Straining my eyes lol.What does it say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I ask is that it seems to say under SIGN TODAY

 

"Personal Information- Before signing this application it is important that you read the paragraphs set out overleaf" or similar?

 

Straining my eyes lol.What does it say?

 

Morning TC and all

 

Your right! That's exactly what you read.

So I suppose they will have the otherside to this since they have the front side with my signature on it.:(

follow the light!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a big assumption to make.

 

Ask for the copy of the other side. They may have scanned the agreement and lost the original.

 

...and if it was there & added anything in their favour I'm sure they would have sent it.Shouldn't worry too much - they couldn't have written Application in much bigger letters.:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Also can someone tell me, the application was signed on 27/7/99 and on the top of the form it was approved on 7/6/99. should that be right?:confused:

 

Can't work that one out.They approved it nearly 7 weeks before she signed it.It's the official office stamp as well, not just hand written.

It's not as if there is lots of info for them to check & then send back to her.

 

I can't believe that they would process an unsigned application.:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...