Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see that at the start of your thread you said they hadn't sent a Letter of Claim.  And in fact in all the uploaded material there is no LoC.  This is great news.  Even were you to lose - you won't - the judge would chop off a chunk of the money for their non-respect of PAPLOC. However, I'm a bit confused as you've named the file name as a SAR.  Are you sure about this?  Did you send any other letters apart from the one dx advised which was a CPR request (not a SAR) to DCBL (not Group Nexus).  I'm not being pernickety, this will be important for your Witness Statement further down the line.
    • I didn’t say it wouldn’t. That is not the issue here. To continue driving after the licence has expired (under s88), the driver must have submitted a “qualifying application”.  An application disclosing a relevant medical condition (of which sleep apnoea is one) is not a “qualifying application”, This means the driver cannot take advantage of s88 and must wait for the DVLA to make its decision before resuming driving.   The driver’s belief is irrelevant. The fact that a licence was eventually granted may mitigate the offence, but does it does not provide a defence.   But this driver didn’t meet the conditions. I explained why in my earlier post. He only meets the conditions if his application does not declare a relevant medical condition. His did.   As I explained, after his birthday he did not hold a licence that could be revoked.   In my view it doesn’t matter what it says. The offence is committed because his application declared a medical condition. Meanwhile his licence expired and s88 is not available to him. The GP letter would form part of the material the DVLA would use to complete their investigations. But until those enquiries are completed he could not drive.   The offence does not carry points or a disqualification (because a licence could have been held by your father). It only carries a fine and the guideline is half a week’s net income. If he pleads guilty that fine will be reduced by a third. He will also pay a surcharge of 40% of that fine. But the big difference is prosecution costs: a guilty plea will see costs of about £90 ordered whilst being convicted following a trial will see costs in the region of £600.
    • I'd recommend getting a new thread started about this. Let us help!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

1st Credit Claimform - MBNA debt i never had - **DISCONTINUED**


AnimalMagic
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5271 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

HI

 

i have had dealings with these people

 

they sent me a stat demand which i ignored however then they informed me they were issuing a bankruptcy petition against me

 

i checked at my local court and they had done this

 

i sent a cca request to them and a S.A.R

 

we have had contact back from them since saying they have withdrawn the bankruptcy petition until they produce the information asked for

 

only 6 days to go before they commit a criminal offence (one month limit)

 

what i am saying is dont ignore these people as they are underhand go to your local county court to see if they have applied for bankruptcy

 

but hit them with a cca request now!!!!!

 

these people will bully you and back you into a corner trying every lie possible to scare you in to paying up,

 

best of luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments... I'm not too bothered by it as I don't believe I owe any money - I've asked for proof of debt which has not been forthcoming. Just a hassle which one could do without... I am going to contact the courts, but didn't have an opportunity last week. If they do present a petition, it will be defended and damages sought. A letter will be going off to my MP as well...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

An update: received a letter this morning saying they were withdrawing the SD and returning the file to 1st Credit as they 'do not hold a copy of the original agreement'.

 

Will be compiling a complaint to the OFT and copying it to my MP.

BARSTEWARDS.!!!!!!

Had you not responded to them with the help of CAG they would have went ahead and got a judgement against you by default even though they had diddly squat to prove it. They are UTTER **** and beneath contempt:mad:

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

As the account is still in dispute re non compliance of CCA request just remind 1st credit of this reffering them to their own file which was returned to them by connaught. Put this in your letter to them 'cos a lot of DCAs have trouble understanding OFT guidlines and unfair practices :rolleyes:

 

Deceptive and/or unfair methods

2.7 Dealings with debtors are not to be deceitful and/or unfair.

2.8 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

a. sending demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that

they are the debtor in question, for example, threatening debt recovery

action to 'the occupier' or sending a payment demand to all people sharing

the same name/date of birth as a debtor in the hope that contact with the

correct debtor will be made.

b. disclosing debt details to an individual when it is uncertain that they are

the debtor in question, for example, disclosing details to 'the occupier' of

an address.

c. refusing to deal with appointed or authorised third parties, such

as Citizens Advice Bureaux, independent advice centres or money

advisers

d. contacting debtors directly and bypassing their appointed representatives

e. operating a policy, without reason, of refusing to negotiate with

debt management companies

f. passing on debtor details to debt management companies without the

debtors' informed prior consent

g. failing to refer on to the creditor reasonable offers to pay by instalments

h. not passing on payments received within a reasonable time resulting in

delays that adversely affect a debtor's financial position.

i. failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is

queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongly pursued

j. requiring an individual to supply information to prove they are not the

debtor in question, for example, driving licences, passports, full name,

date of birth, signatures

k. not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or

disputed debt.

I've highlighted the ones that apply to you.

 

Good luck and best wishes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I've had numerous letters from 1st Credit stating I owe money to various organisations which I've never had any dealings with. Yesterday I received court papers from the northampton court with 1st Credit starting legal action. The alleged debt was with MBNA whom I've never had a account with and the account number (a credit card) is not one of mine past or present.

 

I have located a letter from them dated in Oct 2007, using the same reference, in which they state 'the contents of my letter have been noted' and then they ask me to call them. I believe this may have been a request for proof of debt, but I have been unable to locate a letter from myself around that date. I certainly remember asking them for proof of debt at one point, with no response, but it may be for one of the other accounts they claim I owe money on.

 

I've sent the letter in post 3 here. Is there anything else I should do (apart from notifying the court of my intention to defend)? Should I also send a CCA request?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is diabolical !!! OK....acknowledge the receipt of the claim (that has to be done within 14 days of the date on the claim form) If defending then state that....(but it is too early to file a defence yet) you have a further 14+3 days to submit this.....(PLEASE KEEP AN EYE ON THE TIMESCALES....

 

In the first instance send this by recorded delivery to the opposing solicitors (or whoever's name is on the claim form)....

 

In the XXXX County Court

Claimant -v- (YOUR NAME)

Claim Number: (CLAIM NUMBER)

 

 

Dear XXX

 

CPR 18 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

 

I have received a recent court claim from your organisation. In order to file a defence and counter claim I require some information. Given that this matter is now the subject of legal proceedings, you are obliged to disclose under the Civil Procedure Rules, the information and documents detailed below.

 

The information must be furnished within fourteen days of the receipt of this letter. If you fail to comply, this will be reported to the Court, a copy of this letter will be provided as evidence to the same and an Order enforcing your compliance will be sought.

 

1. A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

 

 

1.1 If copies of any of the above documents are to be relied on in court rather than originals, a copy of the Notice of proposal to adduce hearsay evidence required under s2(1) of the Civil Evidence Act 1995 together with proof of the authenticity of the document(s) as required under s8(1)(b) of the Act, including but not limited to:

 

(a) a copy of the procedure(s) used for copying, storing and retrieving documents

(b) a copy of the relevant log entry showing the time and date of the scan or copy, the name of the member of staff making the copy, the method used for copying, storage and retrieval and time and date of destruction of the original document(s)

© copies of internal and external audit reports covering the entire period from the date of the copy to the present to demonstrate that the procedures have been complied with

(d) copies of Quality Assurance accreditation certificates covering the entire period from the date of the copy to the present to demonstrate that the procedure(s) and audit process(es) comply with the appropriate quality standards

 

2. All records you hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

 

a. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

b. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with *********.(AMEND TO THE COMPANY NAME)

c. .Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

d. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

e. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

f. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

g. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

h. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

3. Any other documents you seek to rely on in court.

 

4. Proof that the debt is not barred by the statute of limitations act

 

 

I will require this information within the next fourteen days. I must advise you that if the information is not forthcoming, it will be reported to the Court that you are trying to frustrate proceedings and denying me the opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

XXXX (type, don't sign).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's basically what I have sent.

 

Also found my previous thread about another account they claim I owe money on, where they issued an SD against me (by second class post). I issued a CCA request and they withdrew the SD and admitted they didn't have an agreement. They're still sending me demands for payment though...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well there's been no response from 1st Credit. I guess I should give them a couple of days, but I'm running short of time so I'm wondering how to respond to the court.

 

Having asked for proof of debt last oct, is this a valid defence? Is their breach of CPR 16.4.2.a a valid defence? Anyone give me an example of a defence where you have no information to work on :-o

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at these.....have a really good read and try and understand what is being said....you might need to do a bit of mixing and matching !!!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/123005-application-form-barclaycard-no-8.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/157114-c-l-finance-defaults.html - you'll have to miss out points 5, 6 , 7 and 8 on this one as you haven't sent the CCA request, but the disclosure of documents covers this

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/140032-hsbc-county-court-claim.html - defence document is in post #12 with an amendment in post #13

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you never ever had any products with MBNA then you can apply to have the case struck out as it would be disproportionate to go to full trial over something that will never be proven by virtue of the fact you never had an account

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you never ever had any products with MBNA then you can apply to have the case struck out as it would be disproportionate to go to full trial over something that will never be proven by virtue of the fact you never had an account

 

Their POC says

The Defendant was indebted to MBNA Europe Bank Ltd for credit advanced. The debt was assigned to the claimant. Notice of assignment was given to the Defendant.

The claimant claims the debt due from the defendant of £3877.96 together with interest at the rate of 8% per annum persuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 amounting to 1152.60 and also claims further interest until judgement or sooner payment at the daily rate of 0.85

Total amount claimed is 5320.56

 

I have never had an MBNA account, but I understand that MBNA do buy up lots of debt. The account number specified in 1st Credit's letters do not match any credit account that I have ever had (at least to my knowledge).

 

Any pointers to a defence asking for this to be struck out? :-)

Edited by AnimalMagic

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...