Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Enforcing parking in private residents parking spaces


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3790 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. First post and found this place through google and I'm hoping someone can advise on my situation...

 

My street:

2 blocks of flats with 60 residences.

Each residence has either an allocated space or a garage.

Deeds state only one vehicle per residence to be parked.

 

There are also about 12 unallocated spaces belonging to a Tesco Express.

 

So anyway, the factors wrote to all the residents a couple of weeks back saying we were being issued with parking permits and the parking would be monitored by a private company.

 

I wrote back formally objecting until they provided further information. They've decided to ignore this and sent the permit through today and stated that failure to display it will result in the private company issuing Civil Penalty Notices. I'll be required to display this when I'm parked in the actual parking bay belonging to my flat.

 

Does anyone know if they are legally able to enforce this? I physically own the land my parking space is on and it forms part of the deeds to my property. (I live in Scotland and the property is freehold) What right does a private company have to enforce parking restrictions on land I own? I understand this kind of thing "works" in shopping centre car parks etc? I also demanded to know who was going to bear the cost of paying this private company for their services. I specifically bought a flat with a designated parking space so I wouldn't have to worry about parking spaces and costs. I fully expect the factors to pass these charges back to the residents withing our "factors fees"

 

With regards to the actual street, there are no yellow lines or council enforced parking restrictions so what right to they have to stop people parking next to the pavement. I appreciate that it's illegal to park on the kerb but as it's a public road with no restrictions I believe people should be allowed to park beside the kerb. This seriously impedes any visiting friends or family as the unallocated spaces will be filled up quickly.

 

I had sent all these questions to them in my letter but they've chosen to ignore it so I'll just have to go nuclear on the phone tomorrow.

 

Anyone dealt with anything similar in the past?

Edited by BoardinBob
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

They've decided to ignore this and sent the permit through today and stated that failure to display it will result in the private company issuing Civil Penalty Notices.

 

How can they issue any type of Penalty notice if they are not authorised to do so?

Link to post
Share on other sites

and certainly not when on your own land. get a ticket/invoice. wait for the letter,. write to the DVLA and get the V888/2 details inclcuding the evidence of contract with the landowner, when it comes back write to the DVLA and tell them that you are the landowner and lodge a formal complaint. and tell the PPC and the property factor where to get off

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh goody - they are BPA Approved Operators (AOS). guaranteed that their paperwork will be non compliant with the BPA Code of Practice so much fun and some retribution can be had by invoking the BPA and the DVLA. canvass your neighbours, see if anyone had had a letter from them yet and post it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So I received a parking ticket today!

 

I've told the property factors that I refuse to display the parking permit. I've asked them why they think they can enforce parking restrictions on land belonging to me, my parking space, without my consent. They've simply ignored this question.

 

The ticket was on the windscreen. Pay in 14 days and it's £60, after that it goes up to £85.

 

So I'm assuming I just ignore it completely even when I'm contacted by mail by this Central Ticketing mob?

 

Should I admit to the factors that I've had a ticket and tell them I'm not willing to pay for it or any subsequent ones or should I just keep quiet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you own the parking space then they cannot. have you signed any kind of agreement that lets them or are there terms in your deeds/lease ? which PPC and what is the name of the property factors ? (PM response if want to and don't want to put it up in public)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parking company is Central Ticketing

 

Factors are Charles White & Co, an Edinburgh based co.

 

They are the appointed factors for the development. Nothing at all in the deeds regarding their ability to enforce any kind of parking restrictions. Guidelines around only parking one car at a time (in single parking space :rolleyes:) and to only park in your bay. I am meeting this criteria.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My letter to the factors

 

Dear Mr XXXXX,

 

 

Many thanks for your letter dated 10/11/08 concerning the issue of parking restrictions at XXX XXXXX development. I would like to bring the following points to your attention:

 

  • The parking space allocated to my dwelling is written into the title deeds of my property and the land is owned by me

  • I have not given you authorisation or consent to employ a private parking firm to monitor and fine drivers of vehicles parked on this land

  • Under the deeds of the property there is no restriction placed on parking a vehicle at the development other than one vehicle at a time to be parked in the allocated bays. There is no provision in the deeds for the enforcement of any parking control or penalty system. Revisions to the deeds would require a consultation with all residents

  • XXXXX XXXX Court has been incorporated as a public road by the local authority. Under the Road Traffic Act 1991 only Traffic Wardens appointed by the local authority or police can issue parking tickets on a public road

 

I therefore instruct you to immediately advise any private company appointed to monitor parking within the development to cease and desist from issuing penalty tickets to any car parked in bay number 20 as this land belongs to me. The private parking company should also be instructed to cease and desist from issuing any tickets to vehicles parked on the public road within the development.

 

Please confirm acknowledgement and action of these instructions within 7 days. Failure to comply with these instructions will result in the commencement of legal action and a residents meeting will be arranged with a view to removing Charles White and Co as the appointed factor for the development. I will be in contact with other residents to inform them of the points I’ve raised above to make them fully aware of their rights and I will be instructing them to ignore any and all parking fines issued.

 

 

Kind Regards

 

 

 

 

Mr XXXXXXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Boardinbob,

 

Just out of curiosity, yuo say there is no yellow lines, has the road been adopted by the council yet?

 

You also say that you own the land, I understand that it is on your title deeds, but you may find that you infact dont own the freehold. I have came accross this recently.

 

And lastly, you have a management company looking after the estate, is there not residents on the board of directors for your development?

 

Derek

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot make unilateral changes to a contract (unless it has been previously agreed that you can do this). It has to be agreed by both parties.

 

Regardless of the freehold situation - it's basic contract law.

 

FWIW I fully endorse your letter and your stand.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Ok so my saga is still ongoing. Despite repeated letters to the property factors, they've chosen to ignore them and Central Ticketing are still patrolling. Laughably they patrol the street circa 5am and issue their tickets then. I assume this is to avoid confrontation with angry residents.

 

There have been a couple of new developments. When this first started only people not displaying a residents permit were being fined. About 4 weeks ago they started fining everyone parked in the street, even those with residents permits.

 

2 weeks ago on a Sunday night my wife was out and returned home and went to park in our own parking space. She called me on her mobile and asked if I had raised the bollard on our space. I said I hadn't and went down with the keys to unlock it. We noticed that several spaces had their bollard raised that dont usually. We've never used our bollard since we moved in two years ago and we've discovered the key we were provided with doesn't work! We were unable to park in our space and have been ever since meaning we've had to park in the street, incurring more fines. Over the last couple of weeks I've noticed a lot more spaces with the bollards raised that wouldn't normally. Someone has had to resort to physically removing the whole bollard to gain access to their space.

 

My suspicion is that someone from the parking company is entering the street and raising the bollards in an attempt to force residents to park in the street thus incurring more charges.

 

We've told the property factors about this, but again they've completely ignored it. I've sent them a map extract from the local authority illustrating that our street is incorporated as a public road and therefore no PPC can issue tickets. Again they've chosen to ignore this.

 

The residents are starting to talk to each other about it and we are not happy. We've demanded a residents meeting with the factors as is stipulated in the property deeds, and surprise surprise they've ignored it. The residents I've spoken to were receptive to discussing removing the existing factor and self factoring or appointing another factor that will be more engaged with the residents needs.

 

I've also received a debt collectors letter in relation to some of the parking charges. I've sent this to the factors and told them to deal with it and inform Central Ticketing that I will not be paying a single penny to park on my own land.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so my saga is still ongoing. Despite repeated letters to the property factors, they've chosen to ignore them and Central Ticketing are still patrolling. Laughably they patrol the street circa 5am and issue their tickets then. I assume this is to avoid confrontation with angry residents.

 

There have been a couple of new developments. When this first started only people not displaying a residents permit were being fined. About 4 weeks ago they started fining everyone parked in the street, even those with residents permits.

 

2 weeks ago on a Sunday night my wife was out and returned home and went to park in our own parking space. She called me on her mobile and asked if I had raised the bollard on our space. I said I hadn't and went down with the keys to unlock it. We noticed that several spaces had their bollard raised that dont usually. We've never used our bollard since we moved in two years ago and we've discovered the key we were provided with doesn't work! We were unable to park in our space and have been ever since meaning we've had to park in the street, incurring more fines. Over the last couple of weeks I've noticed a lot more spaces with the bollards raised that wouldn't normally. Someone has had to resort to physically removing the whole bollard to gain access to their space.

 

My suspicion is that someone from the parking company is entering the street and raising the bollards in an attempt to force residents to park in the street thus incurring more charges.

 

We've told the property factors about this, but again they've completely ignored it. I've sent them a map extract from the local authority illustrating that our street is incorporated as a public road and therefore no PPC can issue tickets. Again they've chosen to ignore this.

 

The residents are starting to talk to each other about it and we are not happy. We've demanded a residents meeting with the factors as is stipulated in the property deeds, and surprise surprise they've ignored it. The residents I've spoken to were receptive to discussing removing the existing factor and self factoring or appointing another factor that will be more engaged with the residents needs.

 

I've also received a debt collectors letter in relation to some of the parking charges. I've sent this to the factors and told them to deal with it and inform Central Ticketing that I will not be paying a single penny to park on my own land.

 

 

You know, given the circumstances, I'd say you all have cause for action in harassment. An action by several of you claiming four figures in damages each, you would sue both the factors and the PPC. If enough of you did it then you would scare the living daylights out of the factors (who won't know what hit them) and you'd give Central Ticketing (who are an amateuring band at best) something to think about.

 

If your bollard has been raised your land has been trespassed and you have been deprived of its use. You would have an action against the factors and the PPC for this also.

 

PJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

court action. PPC and the property factors. demand access to your own spaces and the bollards be fixed. round up the nighbours with raised bollards and see who has keys (that work) and who doesn't. Are the bollards padlocked ? if so cut them off and provide your own padlocks and a copy of the new keys to the property factors.

send every invoice issued to on road vehicles to your local councillor and cc: it to your MP.

demand to see the contract between the factors and the PPC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...