Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This must be part of the new tactic from Evri.  They know they are going to lose. They take it to the wire and then don't bother to turn up in order to save themselves costs and of course they don't give a damn about the cost to the British taxpayer and the extra court delays they cause. This is a nasty dishonest company – but rather in line with all of the parcel delivery industry which knows that their insurance requirements are unlawful. They know that their prohibited items are for the most part unfair terms. They know for the most part that a "safe place" is exactly what it means – are not left on somebody's doorstep in full view. They know that obtaining a signature means that they have to show the signature not simply claim that they received a signature. They are making huge profits especially from their unlawful and unenforceable insurance requirement. Although this is less valuable than the PPI scandal, in terms of the number of people who are affected nationwide, PPI pales into insignificance. I hope the paralegals working for Evri are proud of themselves and they tell their families what they have done during the day when they go home.
    • Your PCN does not comply with the Protection of freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9[2][a] (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The only time on the PCN is 17.14. That is only  a time for there to be a period there would have to be a start and and end time mentioned. of course they do show the ANPR arrival and departures  times but that is not the parking period and their times are on the photographs not on the PCN. They also failed to comply with S.9[2][f] as they omitted to say that they could only pursue the keeper if they complied with the Act. That means that they can only pursue the driver as the keeper cannot be held liable for the charge. As they do not know who was driving and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person they will struggle to win. Especially as so many people are able to legally drive your car and you haven't appealed giving them no indication therefore of who was driving. Small nitpicking point-the date of Infringement was 22/04/2024. They appear to be saying that they can charge an extra amount [up to £70 ] if they have to use a debt collector. You do not have a contract with a debt collector so they cannot add that cost. You paid for four hours so it can only be the 15 minutes they are complaining about. You are entitled to a ten minute minimum grace period at the end of the parking period which would be easier to explain if the car park had been bigger. However if you allow for two minutes to park and two minutes to leave that gives you one minute to account for. Things like being held on the way out by cars in front waiting to get on to Northgate or even your own car being held up trying to get on to Northgate at a busy time. then other considerations like having to stop to allow pedestrians to walk in front of you or being held up by another car doing a u turn in front of your car. you would have to check with the driver and see if they could account for an extra one minute things like a disabled passenger or having to strap in a child . I am not advocating lying since that could lead to serious problems [like jail time] but there can be an awful lot of minor things that can cause a hold up of a minute even the engine not starting straight away or another car being badly parked as examples. Sadly you cannot include the 5 minute Consideration period as both IPC and BPA fail to comply with the convention that you can include that time with the Grace period.  
    • Defence struck out not case struck out...you have judgment  Well done topic title updated Regard's Please consider making a donation if not already to support us to help others.   Andy.   .
    • Hi all, I wanted to update you and thank you all for your help. I am delighted announce that after the case was struck out due to no response from Evri, judgement was issued after I submitted the forms and I was just about to take it to warrant.  today I received an email from the claims department requesting my bank details to make payment for my full award. The process has been long since the initial proceedings  in January i must say your help and guidance has been greatly appreciated.  
    • Quote of the century "Farage pops up when the country’s at a low ebb; like a kind of political herpes" - Frankie Boyle Updates
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You OH's contribution should go in the box 6.7.

 

This should be helpful (but a long read).

 

OR's Technical Manual - IPAs Assessment of real disposable income

 

And if you can open an Excel file, this should let you work out roughly how much an IPA (if any) would be:

 

Income Payments Calculator (Excel spreadsheet)

  • Haha 1

[SIZE=2][COLOR=SeaGreen][FONT=Verdana][URL="http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/"][/URL][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

OH = Other Half

 

Sorry. Too used to forum/internet shorthand. :oops:

 

That spreadsheet is a calculator, so it's a bit hard to put it into another format.:confused:

[SIZE=2][COLOR=SeaGreen][FONT=Verdana][URL="http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/"][/URL][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will my orange contract be taken away from me when i go BR, i pay around £30 a month.

 

Also i realise SKy is seen as a luxury, however it is my partner who uses SKy, is it worth telling sky to have the account in his name only and remove mine? His name is already jointly on the account.

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

when going Br will the OR take working tax credit as income? i am confused as i read on net benefits are not classed as income as they are means tested, i.e you are under a certain yearly amount to get working tax.

 

On my BR form i have included the working tax figure in my income section however the amount i have wrote is the amount for myself and partner am i to include this or divide it by 2 as it is for both of us and he is not going BR.

 

I am concerned as at mo i have a surplus of 350 a month, but i think i should have included dentist, prescriptions etc

 

Thanks again everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

The mobile may well be OK. It is nowadays seen as a reasonable expense.

 

If your bills were much more than you say then you might be required to meet the extra out of any surplus you were left with.

 

Sky is non-essential though.

 

But if you wish to pay for that out of any surplus you have left over after any IPA is deducted, then that is up to you.

 

For example; if you hadd £100 per month surplus, then an IPA would claim £50. If you decide to spend the £50 you are left with on Sky, that is totally up to you. ;)

[SIZE=2][COLOR=SeaGreen][FONT=Verdana][URL="http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/"][/URL][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE]

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you, i'm sure i dont have a 350 surplus a month!? which would mean i pay 231 a month in a IPA/IPO. Do you know if when inputting the working tax amount i should be halfing the figure as the one ive put in is the total working tax received for myself and partner??

 

Thanks so much for forms

Link to post
Share on other sites

does anyone have any info on what figures are deemed as acceptable in expenses eg food, dentist, clothing and so on....

 

Check your PM's.;)

[SIZE=2][COLOR=SeaGreen][FONT=Verdana][URL="http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/"][/URL][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE]

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think i have got confused, missed some figures out of expenditure and i also wrote my income in before tax and ni deducted so that made that smaller. i think working tax is classed as a benefit so if that is the case well i have no surplus i'm actually a minus figure. and if it is my figure i think is 189, but am i right you can keep first 100?

 

So grateful to everyones advise on this, it is all very confusing.

I hope they dont mind mistakes and tip ex on form???

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have not included holidays as i dont ever put anything away for holidays. I was going to put a small amount in the emergencies section say 10 a month?

 

I have included the following: rent, c tax, elec, (dont pay water or tv), food and HK, mobile phone (i dont have a landline) travel clothing, contense insurance, dentist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Geministar2007:)

 

I put down emergency - £10.00 per month

Holiday - £20.00 per month

Dentist - £08.00 per month

and was allowed them, I also put down haircut £10.00 per month, pre pay prescriptions, and also dogfood for my dog went on and I was allowed them all.

Like some people told me we have struggled and struggled for so long we don't make the proper allowances that we are entitled to.

So if you have any pets put their food down too!!

Haircuts for all family members should be ok and so should holiday fund for all of you, I would put £20.00 down for a family, you may be allowed, you have nothing to lose.

Take care

Sugar x x x:D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you i have done it now. i had forgotten some stuff i have not put sky down as my other half pays that now in both names, if we have to cancel and start again in his name alone than fair enough. Sky will be on my bank statements but i will tell them this when the OR calls.

 

Thanks all for your advice will keep you posted! xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello me again.....

 

When the Nil tax code is applied when going BR, does this mean your employer will know you have gone BR? Who else would have Nil code?? What other reasons would be behind a Nil code

 

Also i'm due to go BR end of this coming week. When would the code be applied and is it only until the begin of the new tax year?

 

Thanks everyone,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have worked out i have spent around £500 on gambling within 2 years.

 

How will the OR see this?? I know they may impose a BRU/BRO. Just wondered to what levels of gambling they would impose this. And for an amount like this how long this would be for. I believe the min time is a further 2 years?

 

Also as £200 + of it was deposited from a lloyds basic cash card, with no overdraft, therefore i was in credited. Is that looked upon as badly as taking it out of an overdraft or credit card? as obviously one does not actually have the money to spend, it is a debt.

 

£500 seems a small amount compared to some of the BRU/BRO bankruptcy cases i have read on the insolvency site, those peoples gambling debts were in their thousands if not more.

 

I am far from an addict just like the odd flutter (and have been lucky at times).

 

Anyone had a similar experience?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i apply for a bank account before i go BR, if it is basic and the bank/building society know during the application i am BR?

 

Does anyone recommend which banks/building societies to use?

 

I cant go with barclays, i owe them money.

 

Co op, i have no local branch.

 

I have a Nationwide and Halifax near by, however would their accounts allow direct debits and standing orders etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could have a nil tax code from overpayments of tax in previous years.

 

Your employer isn't told of the reason for the nil tax code, although it is naturally possible to draw conclusions.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to get what is called a 'basic' bank account. This is just another name for the standard instant access bank you use with a passbook (at least with a building society).

These accounts don't allow direct debits or standing orders.

  • Haha 1

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That order of gambling is pretty small beer. You should tell the OR however he probably won't be interested.

Bear in mind that that is equivalent to about £5/week which is what a lot of people spend on the National Lottery.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks. yes i didnt see it like that. i went through my basic bank account statements and found i had spent the most on gambling in the past 6 months just over 200, the rest would have been over a year ago. if it was not listed on my statements i would not even bring it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i already have a basic bank account a cash card account with lloyds, this was opened earlier this year when i started my debt management plan. This has no overdraft or the facility to apply for one. I have listed this in my BR forms, however i am hoping the OR will have no interest in this. What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...