Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Acer sending me refurbished laptop


feck
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5682 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi people,

 

I hope I'm posting in the right section.

 

I bought an Acer 5920g laptop last September for £800, within one week it broke down, i took it back and got a replacement. within 3 months it broke down again and acer fixed it. Within the last year it broke down a further 6 times. The 5th time acer held it for 4 weeks awaiting parts, new motherboard, cpu, video card, DVD player, basically the entire inner workings of the machine, all with refurbished parts. I finally recieved it back and it would'nt boot up, sent it back the very next day finally complaining, that surely this should require a brand new replacement written out in a short letter specifying every case id for every repair.

 

They've had it now for over a week, and when i phoned this morning, they told me they are happy to replace it, and when i asked with a brand new machine, they told me no, this would be a refurbished laptop. Basically another machine that had broken down, with refurbished parts, and it may even be a better specification machine, but at least to the specifications of my old machine. What bugs me really is if they cannot repair my machine, then surely they should replace it with a new one or vouchers, because i still intend to purchase acer, as i have other acer laptops with no problems. Just as importantly if they replace my machine with one of exactly the same specification, then whats the difference between that and just replacing the damaged parts again in my machine?

 

Is there anyway i can demand a brand new replacement or even vouchers for acer products?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who did you buy the laptop from?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi people,

 

I've been given some great news today. Out of the Blue an Acer technician phoned me and informed me that Acer were going to replace my laptop for a brand new boxed laptop, with new warranty and everything. The laptop in question has a larger screen and larger hard drive, everything else seems to be of the same specification. Intel core duo processor, has been swapped for AMD Turion 64 bit X2 Dual Core, and NVidia Graphics has been swapped for ATI Radeon Graphics but all in all, specs are the same.

 

I just cannot believe it, acer have proved themselves to me yet again, to provide the best service in the UK for laptops. I will now go on advising people to keep on buying Acer.

 

Mr Shed, i bought the system from Comet, and ever since my first problem with the machine where they informed me that turn around times for repairs were minimum 20 days, and that they sent it to Acer anyway. I decided to phone acer and they informed me that they would send DHL to my home to pick up, and drop off, and turn around is average 4 days, and up until the last problems they've been true to their word. I've recently purchased extended warranty for extra 2 years on top of the manufacturers standard 1 year warranty for £49 with exactly the same service, where Comet wanted to charge me over £100 for a crap service for only 1 extra year, which would be dealt with by acer anyway. In effect since that first confrontation with Comet i've never dealt with them since.

 

Thanks anyway guys for your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good result ;)

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Jeez,

 

had to send this one back as it was like carrying around a tank, and being slightly disabled doesnt make this easy. Also the Vista Experience index on my original laptop was 4.7 and the new one was 3.5, highlighting a significant change in the capabilities of this new laptop, so i refused and sent it back.

 

On the 20th Sept my warranty ran out, on the 5-8th of Sept i had purchased an extra two years of warranty (Acer Advantage) from 'SimplyAcer', I registered this online, because i thought i was going to have an acer laptop.

Anyway, they could not repair or replace my laptop so they told me the only option was a refund, as i had, already had it a year, (although to be fair they had had it in for repair a total of 7-8 times averaging aroung 12-14 weeks away), that i would have to take a loss on the refund.

The original laptop i purchased for around £769 pricematched to LaptopsDirect, they divided the purchase price by 6, and deducted this from this from the total, which came to around £641. Now I was already upset at this that they could not replace it, but to be told i would lose this angered me even more.

 

When i finally asked about the extended warranty i had purchase a week before, they told me that i could not be refunded on this, and that if i bought another acer laptop, then they would place it with this one. Obviously i asked if this would then be started afresh at the start of getting a new laptop, to take advantage of buying an extended warranty early. They told me that no the extension would start from the time i purchased the warranty and not any new laptop.

 

Basically can they do this or should i complain and grinch about it all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complain about it.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

:!: All the information I impart is my advice based on my experience. It does not constitute professional advice. If in doubt, always consult with a professional. :!:

 

:-) If you feel my post has been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...