Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrows/Marlins Claimform - old LLoyds loan no CCA-**WON..DISC'D+COSTS**


wakeywakey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5546 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, its been 6 days and heard nothing.

My defence needs to be in by 28th which is Sunday so I really need to send it tomorrow (Thursday) to arrive Friday

 

So, saying that I still hear nothing tomorrow morning (7th day), will I need to add anything to my defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprise, surprise, they wrote back saying exactly the same.

"We are not obliged to provide this information"

 

I really am getting confused.

Why am I fighting when they don't have to prove anything?

The laws gone mad.

 

Anyway, what to do now is the question?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may either:

 

[1] put in the Defence along the lines I drafted and which appears at post no13, or

[2] put in an application notice in Form N244

 

If you opt for option [2],

 

in box [3] of the N24 write:

 

'An order that unless within 14 days of the making of an order upon this application the Claimant complies with a request made by the Defendant on (date) pursuant to CPR 31.14 by the provision to the Defendant of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim, namely [1] the agreement [2] the default notice and [3] the assignment, the claim shall stand struck out and the Defendant shall be at liberty to enter judgment against the Claimant without further order of the court with the costs of this case to be paid by the Claimant to the Defendant to be assessed on the standard basis and pursuant to the provisions of The Litigants in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act 1975.

 

The application is made because of the Claimant's refusal to comply with the Defendant's CPR 31.14 request and the documents are required owing to the age of the case and to enable the proper preparation of a Defence.'

 

In Box 4 write: 'Yes'

In Box 5 write: 'Without a hearing'

Ignore Box 6

In Box 7 write: 'None'

In Box 8 write: 'District Judge'

In Box 9 write: 'Claimant'

 

In Box 10 tick the box marked 'the evidence set out in the box below' and beneath it write:

 

'On (date), following service of the Claim Form in this case, I wrote to the Claimant requesting inspection of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim pursuant to CPR 31.14. A copy of my letter of request is attached to this application notice marked 'A'.

 

The Claimant replied by letter dated (date) rejecting my request on the ground it had no obligation to comply. A copy of this reply is attached to this application notice marked 'B'.

 

The agreement relied upon by the Claimant is now very old. The documents sought by my request are essential for the proper preparation of my defence and the determination of the claim and CPR 31.14 afford me a right to inspect those documents.'

 

Sign the statement, attach the copies and complete the remainder of the N244 in the usual way applicable to your case.

 

On a separate piece of paper to be attached to your application notice, write this:

 

Claim No:

 

Draft Order

 

1 Unless by 4:00pm on (date) the Claimant complies with a request made by the Defendant on (date) pursuant to CPR 31.14 by the provision to the Defendant of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim, namely [1] the agreement [2] the default notice and [3] the assignment,

 

the claim shall stand struck out and the Defendant shall be at liberty to enter judgment against the Claimant without further order of the court, and

[ii] the Claimant shall pay the Defendant his/her costs of this case to be assessed on the standard basis and pursuant to the provisions of The Litigants in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act 1975.

 

2 In the event that the Claimant shall comply with this order,

the Defendant shall file and serve a Defence by 4:00pm on (date) and

[ii] the Claimant shall pay the Defendant his/her costs of this application [in any event] [assessed in the sum of £130.00]

 

x20

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Letter from Mortimer Clarke Solicitors dated 16th Oct 08.

 

Arrow Global v me

 

We write in reference to the above matter and in particular your Defence dated 25th Sept 08.

 

We can confirm that you entered into a Loan agreement with Llyods Bank TSB PLC on the 21 Jan 1991.

 

We can confirm that we have requested the relevant documentation from our client: however we note from our clients records that you have made monthly instalments towards the outstanding balance, we therefore believe that the grounds on which you intend to defend the claim are misconceived as the payment made are an admission to the above claim.

 

However, in order to settle this matter amicably without the need for protracted litigation our client is willing yo accept the amount of £1253.53 Payable by monthly instalments of £10

 

Please find enclosed the draft Consent Order in duplicate confirming the terms of the proposed settlement. Please endorse your signature on both pages of the consent Order and return it to our address as listed above within the next 10 days.

 

End

 

----------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Consent Order states:

 

In the Northampton CC Bulk centre

Claim No *********

 

Upon the parties having agreed terms of settlement

 

By Consent

 

It is ordered that all further proceedings herein be stayed upon the terms set out in schedule 1 hereto save for the purpose of enforcing or carrying into effects the said terms with liberty to apply for that purpose.

 

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties do perform and abide by the terms set out in the schedule hereto.

 

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there be no order for costs

 

Dated and named......

 

Schedule 1 states:

 

1. The claimant will accept £1253 (the agreed sum) in settlment of their claim against the Defendant inclusive of interest and costs.

2. The defedant will repay the Agreed sum by making consecutive monthly instalments of £10 with effect from 28th Nov 08

3. In the event of the Defendant failing to pay the monthly instalment of £10 the claimant will be entitled to apply to the court for judgement to be entered against the defendant for the outstanding balance of the Agreed sum.

 

We hereby agree to settlement on terms set out above

 

(Names of both of)

 

End.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Sorry I have had to type it out, not sure how to cut and paste.

 

I have never heard of this Consent Order.

What would be my best action now, given as I cant actually even remember this loan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reads to me like they haven't a hope. They have no documentation and now the fact they've offered to accept the sum over 10 years without interest says that they know it too. The trouble with signing the Consent Order is that if you don't do exactly as it says they automatically get judgement for the lot - it's as if you admitted their claim and asked the court for time to pay. If you did fail in a payment and they got judgement they could then go for a charging order. They are also wrong in saying that by making any payments you have admitted their claim is legitimate. They appear to be real bottom feeders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thinking out loud here, it seems they know their case is dead in the water, so whats stopping you drafting your own consent order along the lines of you discontinue, and i wont claim my costs.

 

Any thoughts on this anyone?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i certainly wouldnt sign it, if you want to reply to them you could just say that you are confident with your defence and you believe their claim cannot succeed, thats my opinion anyway.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, any advice on my last question?

 

Do I just igbnore this Consent Order?

 

If you don't want to accept the offer (and I certainly wouldn't - never mind the fact you're not even clear whether you owe them the money and they can't provide any proof that you do) I'd just tell them as much in writing. Keep it short and sweet, decline to enter into a Consent Order at this stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

 

I ignored the consent order.

 

I received the transfer to my local court letter and my Allocation Questionaire.

 

I could do with some help with this.

 

For example,

A-Settlment- Do you wish to use the small claims mediation service?

I presume No

 

And what is the fee for this?

 

Thanks guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

Info here to help with the AQ

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/131499-directions-n150-n149-allocation.html

 

You dont pay a fee to file yours, but they have to pay a substantial fee to file theirs, this is where a lot of these weak cases fall over!!

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this still relevant though?

 

Haven't the courts decided that the Claimant doesn't need to provide a signed agreement anymore?

 

Yes its very relevant, the court hasn't decided anything yet.

In your AQ you will draft a set of directions asking the court to make an order that they provide all the relevant documents and everything they will be relying on in court.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...