Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrows/Marlins Claimform - old LLoyds loan no CCA-**WON..DISC'D+COSTS**


wakeywakey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5512 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, its been 6 days and heard nothing.

My defence needs to be in by 28th which is Sunday so I really need to send it tomorrow (Thursday) to arrive Friday

 

So, saying that I still hear nothing tomorrow morning (7th day), will I need to add anything to my defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprise, surprise, they wrote back saying exactly the same.

"We are not obliged to provide this information"

 

I really am getting confused.

Why am I fighting when they don't have to prove anything?

The laws gone mad.

 

Anyway, what to do now is the question?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may either:

 

[1] put in the Defence along the lines I drafted and which appears at post no13, or

[2] put in an application notice in Form N244

 

If you opt for option [2],

 

in box [3] of the N24 write:

 

'An order that unless within 14 days of the making of an order upon this application the Claimant complies with a request made by the Defendant on (date) pursuant to CPR 31.14 by the provision to the Defendant of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim, namely [1] the agreement [2] the default notice and [3] the assignment, the claim shall stand struck out and the Defendant shall be at liberty to enter judgment against the Claimant without further order of the court with the costs of this case to be paid by the Claimant to the Defendant to be assessed on the standard basis and pursuant to the provisions of The Litigants in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act 1975.

 

The application is made because of the Claimant's refusal to comply with the Defendant's CPR 31.14 request and the documents are required owing to the age of the case and to enable the proper preparation of a Defence.'

 

In Box 4 write: 'Yes'

In Box 5 write: 'Without a hearing'

Ignore Box 6

In Box 7 write: 'None'

In Box 8 write: 'District Judge'

In Box 9 write: 'Claimant'

 

In Box 10 tick the box marked 'the evidence set out in the box below' and beneath it write:

 

'On (date), following service of the Claim Form in this case, I wrote to the Claimant requesting inspection of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim pursuant to CPR 31.14. A copy of my letter of request is attached to this application notice marked 'A'.

 

The Claimant replied by letter dated (date) rejecting my request on the ground it had no obligation to comply. A copy of this reply is attached to this application notice marked 'B'.

 

The agreement relied upon by the Claimant is now very old. The documents sought by my request are essential for the proper preparation of my defence and the determination of the claim and CPR 31.14 afford me a right to inspect those documents.'

 

Sign the statement, attach the copies and complete the remainder of the N244 in the usual way applicable to your case.

 

On a separate piece of paper to be attached to your application notice, write this:

 

Claim No:

 

Draft Order

 

1 Unless by 4:00pm on (date) the Claimant complies with a request made by the Defendant on (date) pursuant to CPR 31.14 by the provision to the Defendant of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim, namely [1] the agreement [2] the default notice and [3] the assignment,

 

the claim shall stand struck out and the Defendant shall be at liberty to enter judgment against the Claimant without further order of the court, and

[ii] the Claimant shall pay the Defendant his/her costs of this case to be assessed on the standard basis and pursuant to the provisions of The Litigants in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act 1975.

 

2 In the event that the Claimant shall comply with this order,

the Defendant shall file and serve a Defence by 4:00pm on (date) and

[ii] the Claimant shall pay the Defendant his/her costs of this application [in any event] [assessed in the sum of £130.00]

 

x20

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Letter from Mortimer Clarke Solicitors dated 16th Oct 08.

 

Arrow Global v me

 

We write in reference to the above matter and in particular your Defence dated 25th Sept 08.

 

We can confirm that you entered into a Loan agreement with Llyods Bank TSB PLC on the 21 Jan 1991.

 

We can confirm that we have requested the relevant documentation from our client: however we note from our clients records that you have made monthly instalments towards the outstanding balance, we therefore believe that the grounds on which you intend to defend the claim are misconceived as the payment made are an admission to the above claim.

 

However, in order to settle this matter amicably without the need for protracted litigation our client is willing yo accept the amount of £1253.53 Payable by monthly instalments of £10

 

Please find enclosed the draft Consent Order in duplicate confirming the terms of the proposed settlement. Please endorse your signature on both pages of the consent Order and return it to our address as listed above within the next 10 days.

 

End

 

----------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Consent Order states:

 

In the Northampton CC Bulk centre

Claim No *********

 

Upon the parties having agreed terms of settlement

 

By Consent

 

It is ordered that all further proceedings herein be stayed upon the terms set out in schedule 1 hereto save for the purpose of enforcing or carrying into effects the said terms with liberty to apply for that purpose.

 

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties do perform and abide by the terms set out in the schedule hereto.

 

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there be no order for costs

 

Dated and named......

 

Schedule 1 states:

 

1. The claimant will accept £1253 (the agreed sum) in settlment of their claim against the Defendant inclusive of interest and costs.

2. The defedant will repay the Agreed sum by making consecutive monthly instalments of £10 with effect from 28th Nov 08

3. In the event of the Defendant failing to pay the monthly instalment of £10 the claimant will be entitled to apply to the court for judgement to be entered against the defendant for the outstanding balance of the Agreed sum.

 

We hereby agree to settlement on terms set out above

 

(Names of both of)

 

End.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Sorry I have had to type it out, not sure how to cut and paste.

 

I have never heard of this Consent Order.

What would be my best action now, given as I cant actually even remember this loan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reads to me like they haven't a hope. They have no documentation and now the fact they've offered to accept the sum over 10 years without interest says that they know it too. The trouble with signing the Consent Order is that if you don't do exactly as it says they automatically get judgement for the lot - it's as if you admitted their claim and asked the court for time to pay. If you did fail in a payment and they got judgement they could then go for a charging order. They are also wrong in saying that by making any payments you have admitted their claim is legitimate. They appear to be real bottom feeders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thinking out loud here, it seems they know their case is dead in the water, so whats stopping you drafting your own consent order along the lines of you discontinue, and i wont claim my costs.

 

Any thoughts on this anyone?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i certainly wouldnt sign it, if you want to reply to them you could just say that you are confident with your defence and you believe their claim cannot succeed, thats my opinion anyway.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, any advice on my last question?

 

Do I just igbnore this Consent Order?

 

If you don't want to accept the offer (and I certainly wouldn't - never mind the fact you're not even clear whether you owe them the money and they can't provide any proof that you do) I'd just tell them as much in writing. Keep it short and sweet, decline to enter into a Consent Order at this stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

 

I ignored the consent order.

 

I received the transfer to my local court letter and my Allocation Questionaire.

 

I could do with some help with this.

 

For example,

A-Settlment- Do you wish to use the small claims mediation service?

I presume No

 

And what is the fee for this?

 

Thanks guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

Info here to help with the AQ

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/131499-directions-n150-n149-allocation.html

 

You dont pay a fee to file yours, but they have to pay a substantial fee to file theirs, this is where a lot of these weak cases fall over!!

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this still relevant though?

 

Haven't the courts decided that the Claimant doesn't need to provide a signed agreement anymore?

 

Yes its very relevant, the court hasn't decided anything yet.

In your AQ you will draft a set of directions asking the court to make an order that they provide all the relevant documents and everything they will be relying on in court.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...