Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks Andy, There will be money left as they own their house. That's why I was thinking it may be cheaper to pay off the debts now, with a discount, rather than in full when the time comes.
    • No hard or fast rules ...if you have referred to it or intend to refer to it and rely on a document as evidence it goes on the list as an exhibit. No you can raise that within your statement but remember that sec 69 is at the discretion of the court a judge may allow the full amount claimed or reduce it to a lower % or none at all. Yes the claimant must serve their N265 on you...any document on theirs that you do not have you can request a copy and then use in your statement. Will it assist your defence ?
    • Hi all, I have previously been helped by the wonderful people on these forums, which helped me out of debt and to a much stronger position that I am in today, for which I am eternally grateful. My debts were all cleared, I now have no debt (apart from a mortgage) and an excellent credit file. I did also show my gratitude with a donation, which even if it helps just one other person out of spiralling debt, it would have been worth it. Sadly, my elderly parents did also run up some debts a few years ago, some through loans and some through credit cards. A few years ago, my father had a medical episode which has left him paralysed on one side of his body and now is confined to a wheelchair, and is pretty much non verbal (he can only manage a handful of words, and gets confused easily). I'm seriously not sure how far any County Court Action would get against him due to his current state, if any of the DCAs were to proceed down that route. Luckily nonw have tried, but can only think that any action would be discontinued by a judge. Before his medical episode he did set up a payment plan with some of the DCAs that were chasing him, which have continused being paid to this day from his bank account. They are literally minimum amounts, but obviously these actions have kept those debts current. However, some of the other debts have since become statutory barred due to the time elapsed since the last COA. My mum does have Power of Attorney over his financial affairs so can act on his behalf, with me as backup if god forbid anything happens to my mum. Their wills are set up for everything to go to the other should either of them pass away, and then to their children upon the passing of both of them, with myself being named as the executor on both of their wills. I have recently been reading up on the role of an executor, and part of the duties is to pay any outstanding liabilities before distributing the remainder of the estate. I have seen, in several instances, of a recommendation of posting about any death in the local newspaper column and the gazette to limit any future liabilities as executor in case of any debts that are unknown to myself. But this does lead me onto the debts I do know about. Am I right in thinking that the current debts that my dad has been making token payments on would have to be repaid in full to the DCAs upon his death? If that is the case, is it worth negotiating a full and final settlement, with a discount, on his behalf now? And with the debts that are statutory barred, am I correct in presuming that they would not need to be paid upon my dad's death as they wouldn't be legally enforcable in court? Thanks in advance for all of your help!
    • Hello AndyOrch For the n265 please would the below list of documents be sufficient ? 1. Pre-Action protocols. Claimant confirmation that they have not complied or have only partially complied (last page of claimants N181 Direction Questionnaire) Dated 16/04/2024 2. Copy of the Lease - Dated 4th September 1998 3. Statement of account (up to 1st Feb 2024) - Dated 20/02/2024 (This shows a slightly different balance to the one included in the Claim form as theirs was only up to 24th Jan 2024) 4. CPR 31.14 Request - Dated 28/02/2024   With regards to the Claimants claim for interest under Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 where the amount is incorrectly calculated due to the account balance and also appears to be duplicated, should I list their POC ? Additionally should I include any e-mail exchanges (I don't have all as some went to junk and auto deleted due to an issue with my e-mail account and I was reliant on my phone for seeing e-mails) ? I don't have the last e-mail that was sent prior to the claim being issued. I guess that I can ask the claimant for a copy of this one ? The claimant has refused to action the CPR 31.14 request.  Regarding the Section 20 notices relating to the major works, should I include if we have a copy ? Is there anything else that I should include in the list relevant to our defence ? Will the claimant send us a similar list via N265 ? They did include a Continuation Sheet with their N244 giving a background of the case. Just wondering how we know all of the documents that they will rely on.   As always really appreciate any help and guidance that you can provide.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Emma Royd v Alliance & Leicester (MBNA)


Emma Royd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5537 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sent a CCA request on friday 25th July by recorded delivery. Got this back on Friday 15th August (yes I know it's September but i've been burying my head in the sand)

 

Could someone take a look over it and advise please.

 

Reply letter

http://i399.photobucket.com/albums/pp79/EMMAROYD1/scan00101.jpg

 

Agreement

http://i399.photobucket.com/albums/pp79/EMMAROYD1/scan0002-1.jpg

http://i399.photobucket.com/albums/pp79/EMMAROYD1/scan0003.jpg

 

also got printed terms and conditions. This is page 1 of 4 i've received. http://i399.photobucket.com/albums/pp79/EMMAROYD1/scan10001.jpg

Notice the £12 charges and i've had this card for over ten years

 

cheers

 

Emma Royd

xx

Edited by Emma Royd
added terms and conditions
Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks ok

what was the point in the CCA request?

is this an old debt that you are being chased on or were you hoping to avoid something?

there must be charges etc levied against the A/C? p'haps an SAR would have been better?

 

more info please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks ok

what was the point in the CCA request?

is this an old debt that you are being chased on or were you hoping to avoid something?

there must be charges etc levied against the A/C? p'haps an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) would have been better?

 

more info please

 

dx

 

 

How does it look ok? There are no terms or conditions on the items she was sent back. It looks to me like an application form from what I can see.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

more info please

 

Same reason as with cap1 and alliance and Leicester

 

I got made redundant on 16th May and had being paying PPI. I tried explaining my circumstances and that my only source of income was the benefits i'm receiving and would they put my account on hold for a while whilst insurance claims pending. They wont listen and keep bombarding me with phone calls and the usual letters and now my account has gone into default. Oh and the insurance still wont pay out and i'm still fighting them over it.

 

Posted on here a few weeks ago and was advised to send my creditors CCA requests.

 

hope this helps

 

Emma Royd

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

it looks ok

 

Do you mean it looks enforceable?

 

or were you hoping to avoid something?

 

I'm not trying to avoid anything. I don't disagree that I owe the money but I was asking for a little breathing space after being made redundant and them sorting out my insurance claims. I'm still fighting the insurances nearly 4 months down the line and in the meantime the totals on my accounts have spiralled out of control with charges for this and charges for that being added all the time.

 

I would like to claim the charges back but i'm struggling to find the £10 for each creditor at the moment.

 

Emma Royd

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does it look ok? There are no terms or conditions on the items she was sent back. It looks to me like an application form from what I can see.

 

its diff to see what has been removed or not, to hide personal details, as the image is blurred, also the post says terms and conditions were inc separately, there is a very big thread on this site that details the good and the bad...maybe that will help better.

 

i think this case rides on the issue of PPI, the left leg of the company needs to tell the right leg that there is a pending claim, or p'haps a letter pointing to this [obvious] fact to us.

 

keep us informed

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its diff to see what has been removed or not, to hide personal details, as the image is blurred,

 

the document they sent me is of very poor quality. All i've done is tipexed out my signature and my name and address and work details on the application bit.

 

The insurance company is seperate from Alliance(mbna) and i'm starting to think they are draggin their heels on purpose. They keep sending me forms, which I then have to send to the jobcentre, who send them back, which I return to the insurance company, who then keep telling me they want more information. Its a total nightmare and i've got this goin on with four different creditors

 

Emma Royd

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

aw.. this PPI thing is a real nightmare, they take it when you dont want them too, or they insist you have it or you wont get credit.

if you have a rightful claim they drag their heels.

whatever you go, PPi seems a dog.

 

i really do hope you start to get a brighter light at the end of the tunnel with this.

 

i suppose the only saving grace is they are just charging themselves more, 'cause i think you have a good case of getting the various PPI's to pay out here, you appear to tick all the right boxes for qualification on a payout.

why can't they just get on with it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE

 

ok guys wasn't sure the CCA was enforceable or not so thought i'd send them a non compliance letter on the off chance. If anyone has the time could you please have another look for me in post #1

 

 

Anyway this is the letter I received in response. It was dated the 8th so i'm leaving it late as they say I have until the 18th which is tomorrow.

 

http://i399.photobucket.com/albums/pp79/EMMAROYD1/scan440002.jpg

 

 

any thoughts and advise what to hit them back with would be greatly appreciated

 

thanks

 

Emma Royd

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm in the same boat with A&L...Pastel shaded envelopes with threats inside etc...:)

 

So, we can't see anything from that agreement can we? So it's illegible for a start, which is against the rules....:)

First question is: are the prescibed terms within the 4 corners of the signature document?

 

Does it have APR, repayment amount, credit limit, repayment amounts?

 

I can't see them to be honest. If they claim that they are contained within the T&C - Does the T&C relate to the front page? No, as the original terms were full of charges for 25 quid...

 

So, they may have complied with the requirement to supply a true copy of the agreement - So they are not in default of the 1974 regs and your request bfor a true copy, however that does not change the fact that the agreement may be unenforceable...

 

They have sent you the minimum they are required to by law, but in order to enforce they must produce the original in court and it must have ALL of the prescribed terms...

 

Mine doesn't so I sent a letter telling them so - i.e. illegible, missing the prescribed terms, T&C's that didn't relate to the original agreement, missing pages etc.

 

They sent me a letter saying the same as yours - So I sent the my letter again, the same as the last one...I got the same letter as you back, again...Now I just ignore it all...

 

I'm not sure if this any help to you, but I really am not going to take them seriously until they take me to court - which they may or may not...If they do, I'm pretty sure they will loose...

 

All I'm saying really is that there is no need to panic, you have all the time in the world - It will be ages before they do anything definative..Mine has been going on for 5 months now and I still get the same letters as you...

 

So I would simply send them the same letter as you sent them last time and then leave it at that...IMHO..But canvass a little more opinion before comitting to anything...But good luck anyway..And I'll help in anyway I can..Laters...M

  • Haha 1

:)** Any opinion expressed by me is given with the best intentions - But I could be wrong so bear that in mind**:)

Missed Call Checker - http://whocallsme.com/Phone-Calls.aspx/077/m

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emma, the prescribed terms are definitely missing and the T&C's are clearly the most recent ones, not the ones that existed when you applied. See my draft letter on your capital one thread.

 

Good luck.

 

BTW - Were you told that you needed the PPI to get the card?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Multay and smt37

 

Smt37 thanks for the draft letter on Cap One thead. Think i'll send it to A & L for good measure. Had a couple of phone messages off them in the last few days asking me to ring them.

 

 

BTW - Were you told that you needed the PPI to get the card?

 

To be honest I can't remember I've had this card at least ten years. I looked through all A & L paperwork I have the other day looking for T & C's regarding the PPI and all I can find for that are recent ones.

 

I've emailed my MP as advised on another thread regarding PPI's not paying out amongst other things and i've had reply back from his secretary saying he'll be in touch shortly. Should I mention this in my letter back to A & L ?

 

cheers

 

Emma Royd

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking that if your outstanding balance is less than the PPI you have paid and you were mis-sold it, you may be able to claim it back and reduce the balance to zero anyway.

 

Actually, you could do that once they've agreed to write off the debt because there is no CCA - and then claim the PPI back :)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks again smt37

 

had a little help from some guardian angels today. They've helped me with the last lot of insurance bumph so hopefully that will kick them into paying out at last.

 

I do plan to go for charges but at the moment I can't afford to pay for the SARs

 

Emma Royd

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D

 

The help I got from the guardian angels worked !!!!!!

 

just got a letter from Alliance & Leicester insurance to say they are making a payment of £1082.20 to Alliance & Leicester credit card for the period 19/05/08 to 15/09/08.

 

I've also received this http://i399.photobucket.com/albums/pp79/EMMAROYD1/scan05001.jpg

 

sent them a letter which smt37 kindly posted on my other thread yesterday by recorded delivery in reply to a similar letter I got last week.

 

Now i'm not sure where to go from here seeing as they are paying out on the insurance. Do I still go up the CCA route or is it now time to SAR them? Over the last four months they have slapped me with loads of charges and default notices. Would it be a good idea to check my credit report?

 

I suppose what i'm really asking is can I get them to remove all the crap they've slapped on me since May 19th whilst this insurance claim was pending?

 

any advice would be much appreciated

 

thanks

 

Emma Royd

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose what i'm really asking is can I get them to remove all the crap they've slapped on me since May 19th whilst this insurance claim was pending?

 

Why don't you ask them - very politely but very firmly. See what they say. If yes then all is well. If no then wheel out the big guns.

  • Haha 1

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...