Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • eh? this doesn't make sense.... CCTV capture pic from 02 feb NTK 14 may.. thats not within 14 days for an ANPR capture and certain outside 29-56 if they'd ever issued a notice to drive on the windscreen. met trying to mug you here have you the pcn? dx
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Thank you for supplying information early on, that's really helpful. People should be along to advise later but in the meantime, please don't appeal. You could end up outing the driver on the day - please don't tell us who it was - and make life more complicated. Best, HB
    • 1 Date of the infringement 02nd February 2024 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 14th May 2024 PDF scan done Redacted and Attached 3 Date received 20th May 2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Not that I can see 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes? (Photo of my car entering at 23:34 on the PCN itself, and leaving at 23:57 only visible on the appeals site, but I don't see how parking for 23 minutes is against the rules anyway?) 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] N/A 7 Who is the parking company? Met Parking Services 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Southgate Park, Stansted (346) For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA Any advice is greatly appreciated. Many thanks.   2024-05-14 MET NTK incident 2024-02-02.pdf
    • Slow down a bit, this will be OK.   You have another three days, yes?  Hopefully people will be along to advise later. HB  
    • Thank you All, i apologise for the lack of paragraphs  i'm new and unsure how to use this and cannot convert my photos of the forms  to pdf's sorry so i really don't know what do, was very stressed with everthing going on without his happening. i don't know if i should just plead guilty  online because i'm going to run out of time and worried. There's loads of forms  but it's mainly three options to plead guili don't y i want to attend court, guilty i don't want to attend court, Not guilty. and then two options to plead to the speeding offence and failure to give information. The another page for migation and others for details like earnings etc
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest and the Limitations act reply..


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5736 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello to all and thanks for looking in,

 

I had a debt which expired in August 2nd 2002

 

This was 6 years ago and has been cleared from my credit file. I have or did not acknowleadge this debt in any way since the last payment which was now just over 6 years ago the default date and last known payment was as above 2nd August 2002.

 

Capquest have persued me for the last couple of months for this debt. I did not acknowledge there letters in any way.

 

On the 18th August 2008 i sent them a signed for recorded limitations act letter to which they received and replied my account is now on hold for 28 days.

 

Can anybody tell me what my next step should be as i do not know what happens next, any help greatly appreciated,

 

KB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you certain that there is no ccj with this debt? if so, they are now aware that you know your protection under the limitations act, I wouldn't answer any further correspondence from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No i'm 100% certain there is no CCJ with this debt i have constant access to my credit file there is no CCJ's on my file.

 

So can you tell me do they need to reply within the 28 days?

 

The limitations act letter states they kind of need to agree its' outside the time limit and inform me by letter the matter is closed. This is what the limitations act letter asks for will they do this and if not not what can i do next if anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remembering that the debt hasn't gone away, and never will, the limitations act (statute barred) does not prevent someone chasing you for it, (although that could be classed as harrassement), it means they cannot enforce payment and they can't get a ccj to force payment because of the time limit.

 

There are exclusions though depending on the type of debt, do you want to say what the debt was for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

also,

when they realise they have no chance of collection, they sell the account on to another dca

once they have been informed statute barred, i remind them i have no intention of paying and any further contact woud be regarded as harrasment

every now and then a new dca comes out of the wood work.

 

these are from 1998

 

i just ignore and they tend to go away as they are fully aware of the limitations act

 

i believe its 12 years where property is concearned , not six

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are ok, just forget it now, they have had six years in which to attempt recovery and had the full weight of the law behind them to do so. Because they couldn't be bothered they have now lost that opportunity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...