Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Andy v CapOne


andyford2000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5514 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

and i thought MBNA was mad enough when they phoned me several times a day at work over an underpayment of a sum of around 60 pence!These banks are petty!:rolleyes:

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

All i can say is these banks are getting pretty desperate!when they worry about sending out letters about owing them 48 pence!:rolleyes:

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

THe have written to say they are NOT demanding the 48p - they are asking nicely :)

 

The DCA have ovbiously seen the light and pased the account back to Cap one. That presumably means that theDCA at least think that either they don't stand a chance of collecting or that it would be more trouble than it is worth.

 

You were claiming just short of £3k in unlawful charges and they defaulted you for £600 odd. They have also paid some of the charges. Give of take the odd 48p, have they now effectively settled all of your claim? or at least the money part of it?

 

If not, the answer is clear, send in the AQ. You could always add a note telling the court of the latest development. Presumably in all this, they haven't removed any default markers?

Edited by steven4064
Changed after I actually read the thread

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven and thanks for the feedback, They defaulted my account whilst it was in dispute, not allowed me thinks. They have paid me back the charges and ppi payments, but no interest, the stumbling block seems to be the 22.13% (CCI) i am claiming for, think i made a monumental mistake bu not asking for the purchase rate, just went with what it said on their supposed cca. anyway, the real thing i want is the default and adverse comments removing from ones credit files and hopefully some interest too on my money. cannot believe they have sent me letter saying that i still owe 48p and that they have update my credit files saying there is a special flag of partial settlement. arhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

 

could really do with some help filing in the AQ under the other information section.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should just use the standard one from the templates library ( http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html) and some draft directions from http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/147609-draft-order-directions-including.html basically asking for information provingtheir charges are reasonable, etc. You maywant to change the 'otehr info' bit a bit to say something about them having rrepaid the charges but not the interest thereon which you consider yourself entitled to because the charges it was lavied on are unlawful. You admint that the defendant disgrees with this but the information you are asking for will provie the facts that will enable the court to decide on the matter. Similarly, you aver that the defaults are equally unlawful for the same reason and , again, the information requested will allow the court to decide on the matter.

 

The information you areasking for is everything that shows what their actual costs are when you brecahyou agreemenent by paying late. POst what you come up with and we will look at it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just going over a few things and have been looking at there supposedly credit card agreement whick is sighned by myself and have come across this little excert, so would i be right in thinking I have asked for the correct interest rate, also I have noticed too that I have actually claimed for a total off £1309.39 and they are saying that there are refunding £1032.48 in default charges. nearly £300 difference, hmmmmm

 

17thAugust20072-1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case the claim is not for just the outstanding interest it is for the outstanding charges and the outstanding interest. THe draft directions you need are just the bits relating to their costs and why they think the charges are fair.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

UNder G I would add that the information you are requesting will enable the facts of the matter to be elucidated and further Over-riding Objective. If the Defendant has the serious intention of defending this case at trial as is indicated in its defence, then it is incumbent on it to disclose this information.

 

In your draft directions both points start "the claiman shall". One of them should be "the defendant shall"

 

Read it through, spell check it and correct the format

 

Otherwise OK

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Andy!

 

Just a flying visit...

 

If it is any help, have a read of my Thread below, because I have covered AQs in some detail, and made sure I listed every issue that I had out so that other people could read and follow how I did it (with thanks to all those who helped me).

 

[/url] BRW v A Particularly Nasty Bank

 

If nothing else, it may help you to see how my AQ came together, and then you can cross-check mine with yours.

 

There might be the odd issue that may help.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hello everyone, sorry not been on for a couple of weeks. just back off holiday and have had a letter from the court regards all the above.

 

anyway, attached is a copy (edited of course), please could some help me, by letting me know what documents i need to get together for court, only have 12days left now, so quite urgent really

 

allocationedited.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need a witness statement/ statement of case which sets out your case with references to any case law or statutes and any other evidence, such as bank statements, agreements, etc (I can't remember what you case is for so I'm rambling a bit :rolleyes:).

 

The bundle will then consist of this statement plus copies of all the evidence, case law and statutes that you have referenced.

 

You will need 3 copies - one for them, one for you and one for the court. Yours should have originals of docuemnts rather than copies if appropriate. Put each bundle in a ring binder or similar and number the pages (actually, number them before copying)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...