Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the scrappage scheme is nothing to do with the agreement ...sorry. it's an enticement to purchase a replacement vehicle. just the same as shop signs that say 50% off or whatever.  its a done and dusted deal done before you enter into the agreement for the remaining £sum. 
    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. So I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you dont have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
    • This is the crux of the argument. The scrappage contribution should have also been counted as a deposit. It was literally a part exchange in return for a cash deduction so there is no reason it wouldn't be treated the same way.  I did not request a VT, I was struggling to pay after a separation from my partner at the time. However had the figures been reflected correctly, the VT cost would have been 2k not 9k and I may have considered it as an option. Instead, the car was marked stolen and removed from my possession by the police
    • LOL - old one the fiver theory - although with the poops its take a fiver now, promise 10p  sometime in the future while claiming the reverse theory   So when is jenrick, an apparent slam dunk as referenced higher in the thread, being referred to the police? These poops need to know that anything they throw will be returned .. with interest  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds TSB Collection Center - Help!


thinkdesign
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5767 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello!

I have just discovered this forum & really hope that you can help me.

 

I received a letter about a month and a half ago, from Lloyds TSB asking for £303.51. I was rather concerned with this, and not just the money, more the fact that i haven't used this account for the past 2.5 years (March 2006).

 

The letter stated that in March 2006, i went 9pence overdrawn which i had no idea about until receiving this letter, as my lack of use on the account was generating no bank statements.

 

I phoned up the collections center, who also informed me that Lloyds had contacted Experian (credit ratings) to gain my new address - which will ultimately affect my credit rating.

They told me that I needed to write a letter, disputing these charges, which I have done - but have received no further contact. (It was a PO Box address - and i have read on these forums countless times that things sent to PO Box's rarely turn up anywhere).

 

I have now been told that i have until the 14th of this month (August) to pay the money, or further action will be taken to reclaim the expenses on this account.

 

Upon receiving this final warning, I went to see an adviser at Lloyds, who said that the claims were completely ridiculous and unfounded, seeing as i hadn't used the account for 2.5 years, and was only 9pence overdrawn.

I sent a letter through Lloyds, internally to the complaints department, and again, i have heard absolutely nothing from them.

 

The Current sum of money I apparently owe Lloyds is now roughly £400, with another set of charges to be added at the beginning of September.

 

I'm getting really worried now that I am going to have to go to court, or have possesions taken to recover the money - which to me, and everyone i have told seems a very extreme case!

 

If anyone could offer me some advice and perhaps my next steps, it would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks for your time.

 

Ben :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, Ben.

 

You need to send a SAR to Lloyds TSB to see what charges have been applied to this account, then start the process of claiming them back.

This will put your account in Dispute and Lloyds cannot take any further action on the account until the Dispute has been fully resolved.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

 

If you already know what charges have been applied, start to claim them back.

 

Have a look at the step-by-step.........

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html

 

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your quick response!

 

Do you think that it would be in my interest to set up a 'six month repayment' plan with the collections department, as that is what they keep telling me.

Will this stop any further charges? And if i do set up this repayment plan, can I then take further action to claim this back at a later date?

 

I have, over my lunch hour, been into my local branch and had the manager phone the collections center to find out of any updates to my situation.

they have said that it will take 28 working days to get back to me with a response, but I only have 5/6 days left before they take further action - which is why I am contemplating the Six Month Repayment scheme, as a precautionary measure.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm getting really worried now that I am going to have to go to court, or have possesions taken to recover the money - which to me, and everyone i have told seems a very extreme case!

 

 

Just to put your mind at ease on this one - nobody except a county court baliff even has a right of entry, let alone the ability to take anything off you. To get a county court baliff out, they'd have to have a CCJ against you. If they filed an N1 to claim against you them I'm sure you'd have one hell of a defence based on the fact it's all over 9p! *IF* it came to that, which is doubtful (they know they'll never get their money if they go to court, so would rather do it through their internal collections guys) the peeps on here will prove real helpful in putting a defence together :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

DO NOT PAY THEM - it clearly is a debt made up of charges which you can reclaim. They want you to believe that you OWE THEM this money for THEIR lousy service. I've had similar with Natwest - 2.10 od for less than 24 hours earned me a £38 charge which I am reclaiming...

 

Next time they call tell them that due to the severity of the situation you will only deal with them in writing - the debt is in dispute due to the charges and you will not discuss this matter with anyone other than your local branch manager face to face.

 

If necessary go to your local MP and them to get Trading Standards and the OFT involved.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair, TSB collections department don't add extra fees and will usually stop charging interest too. I had ~200 quid of charges that were due to be applied stopped on the basis I'd pay £10 a month off the 'debt'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long ago was that. They changed a lot of their policies lately, some in April and some in June. All they want is the charges paid - which in the case above seem totally unjustified,

 

I wouldn't pay them anything and complain and complain about the way they allowed this debt to build up before any contact was made with their customer. Had they contacted the customer earlier the situation would probably have been resolved much earlier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't agree more on that one, they do seem to stretch these things on as long as they can. Part of the charges I'm currently claiming back was a good £900 when I was landed out of work a few years back and a single debit bounced, which then spiralled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...