Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I plan to be honest to avoid any further trouble, tell them that the name should be changed to my official name
    • There is no evidence that I was issued a PCN that was placed on the car and removed. It seems that I was issued a £60 PCN on the 8th of March (the parking date) but it was never placed on my car, instead,  they allege that they posted the PCN on the 13th of March and deemed delivered on the 15th. I never got this 1st £60 PCN demand. I only know about all of this through the SAR. I only received the second PCN demanding £100, which was deemed delivered on 16/04/2024 - that is 39 days after the parking incident.  I did a little research and "Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations." as per London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The main issue is that I was not aware of the 1st £60 PCN as I didn't receive it - I'm not sure how this relates to the 28-day rule because that rule applies to the initial £60 PCN. PCM could say that "we sent him the letter by post and it was deemed delivered on the 15th of March" therefore the 28-day rule does not apply.  As regards the safety of the parking attendant, that is clearly something he chose to feel and he made the decision that his safety was threatened - I didn't even see him or had any interaction with him. I'm nearly 50 and I definitely don't look aggressive 😊  
    • okay will do. I'll let you know if anything transpires but once again - many thanks
    • Personally I would strongly suggest not risking going there with debts. Very possible you wont get back out again. And I know many in that position. Not jailed just unable to leave. the stories of Interpol in other countries sounds far fetched but in and out of Dubai is not a good idea. only two weeks ago a mate got stopped albeit a govt debt.
    • BTW the time in and out is less than 10 mins, more than 5 in case that's relevant? I saw an article posted on here about a year ago a proposed legislation change but i don't know if that went through or not? I'm also a blue badge holder but there it was a regular parking spot.   Private parking fines to be capped at £50 WWW.BBC.CO.UK Drivers will also need to be given a grace period for lateness, as part of a crackdown on parking firms.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice on Lowell letter


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5575 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Mr Anchovy. Do not get yourself too concerned as to whether or not the Leeds Losers signed for the letter or not. Its safe to assume that they would have got it two working days after you sent it. The Courts accept that letters sent by 1st Class post are deemed delivered after two working days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You can now expect a letter saying they are preparred to offer anything between 60 to 80% off the debt amount......when that doesnt work, they will close the file :)

 

From personal experience very recently I can confirm the above as a true and accurate statement. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

From personal experience very recently I can confirm the above as a true and accurate statement. :D

 

I opened one of their threatograms recently addressed to the previous occupant offering a whopping 80% discount....i couldnt help myself with the laughter after i read it :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can now expect a letter saying they are preparred to offer anything between 60 to 80% off the debt amount......when that doesnt work, they will close the file :)

I can confirm that you will get this once in a lifetime wonderful offer twice before they admit defeat. They have diddly squat hence the apparent discount offer. 80% of nothing = nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can now expect a letter saying they are preparred to offer anything between 60 to 80% off the debt amount......when that doesnt work, they will close the file :)

 

Yup, I went through the exact same series of letters from the Leeds Losers.

 

75% discount (for one day only)

 

another about two weeks later- the 75% discount was still avialable. (Sorry, we're still looking for the agreement)

 

The about 6 weeks after I sent the CCA request O got a letter confirming that they didnt have the agreement and wouldnt contact me again.

 

(Thats what they think- they also bought £4000 of unlawful charges, plus interest when they bought my account!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel robbed - I only got a 63% discount!

 

:-D

 

But got the offer twice and then they conceded defeat and closed the file.

 

Thats what they think - they got the letter asking for money back, defaults removed, etc and they replied with "Case Closed".

 

They are now in receipt and processing my Formal Complaint - they've had that 2 weeks now - they have 4 weeks and must reply. Wonder what they will say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In ten days you will get another saying exactly the same.

 

 

 

 

****NOTE to Lowell Guests watching. Time to tell Andy B to rewrite the threatomatics. We are wise to his silly games*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

****NOTE to Lowell Guests watching. Time to tell Andy B to rewrite the threatomatics. We are wise to his silly games*****

 

Apparently the mysterious Andy B doesn't read anything he signs :rolleyes: According to one of his threat monkeys anyhow. Won't lower himself to speak to the great unwashed either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Letter received 10/11/08 but dated 3/11/08

 

(My CCA request sent 11/10/08)

 

"I can confirm our client has yet to furnish us with your agreement"......

 

....."there will be no further correspondence from us until the agreement has been received at which point we will require payment in full"

 

 

Is this them giving up?

 

Can I expect anymore bull from them?

 

Do I get my £1 postal order back?

 

Mr A

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't get my pound back! Hasn't stopped me hassling them for it though. My last correspondence to them was that I was sending my request to my pre-litigation department :D I am quite willing to issue court papers for this pound, however, they have promised to send me my pound next week. We'll see.

 

Just as another note, Alison Sheppard of customer services who is handling my request for my quid also never takes calls from the public :-x Do any of these people who sign letters ever speak to outsiders?

 

PS Your letter sounds as though they are dragging it out towards the inevitable conclusion of a closed file - fingers crossed.

Edited by fiftypence
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Back again!:confused:

 

Letter received today (21st Jan) from Lowells, with "original credit agreement" enclosed. I requested CCA from them 11/10/08 and eventually received the "file closed" letter on 02/12/08.

 

The "original credit agreement" is a very shady photocopy dated 2001.

 

Anyway, why are they pestering me again? I thought they had 10+2 days to find the CCA, it's been more than 70 days now. Should I now find out if this "debt" is indeed statute barred?

 

......or just ignore them for a while again.

 

regards

Mr A.

Edited by Mr Anchovy
Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont have to send the Account in Dispute letter. Clownells are so called professionals and as such should be aware of their LEGAL responsibilites. Its time enough sending the dispute letter if they send any more begging letters without complying with their Legal duty.

 

If you send them the Stat Barred Letter then this places the onus on them to prove otherwise

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Mr Anchovy Its a completely different letter. Are you living in Scotland now? If so send them this

 

Dear Cretins or Dear Sir/Madam

 

Your Ref : xxxx

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOU OR ANY COMPANY YOU MAY REPRESENT

 

I refer you to your letter dated xxxxxx

 

I note that you have established that my account will fall under the jurisdiction of Scottish Law.

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that under The Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 Part 1 Section 6 "If, after the appropriate date, an obligation to which this section applies has subsided for a continuous period of 5 years:

 

(a) without any relevant claim having been made in relation to the obligation, and

(b) without the subsistence of the obligation having been relevantly acknowledged,

 

then as from the expiration of that period the obligation shall be extinguished:"

 

The last acknowledgement of this alleged debt was made over five years ago. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written acknowledgement from myself in the relevant period under Part 1 Section 6 of The Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 , I would respectfully suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against myself to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

 

yours etc

 

 

 

If you are now living in England or Wales then send letter M

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...