Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request? Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Björn Ulvaeus appeared on stage in East Yorkshire at a conference held at the Bridlington Spa.View the full article
    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit Not Complying With Stat Barred Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks babybear39 I will indeed have this one set aside. I don't know what they would gain by making me bankrupt. There's not much if any equity left in my home, and there would be other creditors before them who would take priority. Infact I don't think there would be enough to go round considering the state of the housing market at the moment.

 

Now regarding this SD. It was sent 2nd class post (24 pence) and what makes me laugh is that every sd they send me looks different. This one is spread over 3 white A4 sheets of paper with no blue triangle in the top left hand corner. Also no court name is given. It is however "Form 6.1". It asks that I phone them to find out which court it is or if I want to discuss payment. Infact reading between the lines, the covering letter emphasises phoning them...In fact all they seem to want to do is to manipulate and bully me down the phone...It ain't going to happen. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

An SD isn't issued by a court, so no blue triangle. You need to call your local county court that deals with bankruptcy to get it set aside.

 

DO NOT PHONE 1st crud, there's no need. The SD is more than likely a bullying tactic and abuse of process but you really do need to take it seriously.

 

Do as I said in post #43 and also ask the judge at the hearing for punitive damages as they've done this 3 times before. That'll slap them on the wrist ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to apply to have this sd set aside this week. I work near the High Court in Central London so will go down there in my lunch hour.

 

There are a few things I am unsure of though. What information will the judge expect from me? ie. details of the debt and when it was last acknowledged or paid. I only know it was approximately 6 years ago. Also, as well as me thinking it's stat barred, should I also give the reason of having it set aside was asking 1st Credit to prove it wasn't Stat Barred to which they never replied? Basically the debt is still in dispute and they are pursuing it and shouldn't be.

 

I am a little nervous of sitting in front of a judge and also don't want to look a fool because I hadn't got my defence in order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks babybear39 I will indeed have this one set aside. I don't know what they would gain by making me bankrupt. There's not much if any equity left in my home, and there would be other creditors before them who would take priority. Infact I don't think there would be enough to go round considering the state of the housing market at the moment.

 

Now regarding this SD. It was sent 2nd class post (24 pence) and what makes me laugh is that every sd they send me looks different. This one is spread over 3 white A4 sheets of paper with no blue triangle in the top left hand corner. Also no court name is given. It is however "Form 6.1". It asks that I phone them to find out which court it is or if I want to discuss payment. Infact reading between the lines, the covering letter emphasises phoning them...In fact all they seem to want to do is to manipulate and bully me down the phone...It ain't going to happen. :rolleyes:

 

 

If it doesn't specify court then it is invalid

Link to post
Share on other sites

DO NOT CALL 1st crud.

 

As you know where to take it that's fine, do that, but do not ignore the SD.

 

Another poster mentioned making 3 copies, 1 for you, 1 for the court and 1 for the DCA.

You must be joking, no way!

 

I will make 3 copies of the sd though. Thanks babybear39!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. But seeing as you're applying for it to be set aside, you can't actually deny recieving it ;)

I would like to use the fact that it was sent 2nd class post as one of the reasons for setting aside. Would this be a good idea?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to use the fact that it was sent 2nd class post as one of the reasons for setting aside. Would this be a good idea?

 

I believe the letter (no pun intended) of the law states first class post provided all other attempts at correct service have been tried, i.e. personal service at home, place of work, letters asking for a specified appointment time for the purpose of serving the SD, etc, only if all those fail then first class post can be used. Won't do any harm I guess to mention that 2nd class was used to see if the judge picks up on it. But it might be a bit risky to use that as the sole reason for set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the letter (no pun intended) of the law states first class post provided all other attempts at correct service have been tried, i.e. personal service at home, place of work, letters asking for a specified appointment time for the purpose of serving the SD, etc, only if all those fail then first class post can be used. Won't do any harm I guess to mention that 2nd class was used to see if the judge picks up on it. But it might be a bit risky to use that as the sole reason for set aside.

No, the reason for setting aside is that it is Stat Barred. It is also in dispute. They can't chase a debt that is in dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was me in your position, get the stat demand to the court....reasons are...

 

The debt is barred by the Statute of Limitations Act 1980

 

As you received the demand by second post you believe that it has NOT been served properly.

 

Despite your rights, you have received no statements, notices of assignment, no default notices, no letter before action. And to this day all you have received is a letter saying 'YOU OWE US THIS'

 

Claim your costs back @ £9:25 per hour + postage + mileage + parking

 

Send a letter of official complaint to 1st Credit, if they fail to respond or NOT to your satisfaction....

 

Report them to the FOS (Who will charge 1st Credit c £450 to investigate)

 

The FOS may also compensate you if you have a financial loss

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...