Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Non existant eBay Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5787 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello after a brief panic and a quick google I came across this site.

I have received a letter from Intrum Justitia claiming to be acting on behalf of ebay Europe SARL over a balance of £49.17.

The thing is I have never set up a sellers account on eBay which has been confirmed on the eBay chat help and my account balance is 0.

They (ebay) suggested I emailed them with the details, however I now seem to be going around in circles.

They confirm that my account has never been set up as a sellers account, but then go on to say it may be a secondary account but I have to email them from this secondary account to find out the details.

As I have no secondary account this is impossible, I have expressed concern that my name and address are being used fradulently, they say they will investigate but it will take up to 30 days.

I contacted Intrum Justitia via phone and explained all this but they are still demanding I pay them.

Looking on the forums it seems others are having problems but they seem to be over late payments.

Just wondering what my next step is as I go on holiday in a week and would like to get the ball rolling before that. I don't fancy coming home to a pile of threatening letters

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't really help but I'm interested to hear of your experience as my mum recently received a demand for payment/threat of further action type letter from a DCA (not sure which one) addressed to my recently-deceased sister (all post from my sister's address is being forwarded to mum's address) with regard to a supposed debt of c.£44 in regard of eBay. Now, I know my sister did sell some stuff on eBay but I was surprised to hear of this alleged debt of £44 because all she used to sell was small stuff at small prices (books/clothing she no longer wanted and some small crafted/knitted items) which would be unlikely to accrue that much in outstanding seller fees.

 

In our case my mum has contacted the DCA and they have said the debt will be dropped/annulled on receipt of a copy of the death certificate but your experience does make me wonder about where this supposed debt has come from and how legitimate it is...

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is typical of the behaviour exhibited by DCAs. Don't worry - we're all well-used to it by now.

 

You need to send off a letter to IJ saying that eBay is investigating a probable fraud and you will contact them when you hear back from eBay, and leave it at that.

 

 

Whatever you do don't ever talk to them on the phone. As you have found out DCAs can be pretty aggressive so tell you will only correspond in writing.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an update to my post above, I've spoken with my mum and the letter to my sister came from Intrum Justitia too - which makes me even more suspicious of this supposed debt. Thankfully, it seems to one thing that does get a DCA to back off (and the guy on the phone to apologise profusely, according to my mum) is being told that the person they are chasing has recently died. :mad:

 

I have to say though, this seems really dodgy to me. DCAs aggressively chasing people for debts is one thing, but this seems more like a deliberate fraud - chasing people for debts they don't have. Who are Intrum Justitia and do they actually have any authority from eBay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many years ago my wife had some problems with IJ and had nothing but hassle, even long after she had gone bankrupt:mad:

Sorry to say it took the threat of court action for harrassment in writing from us to finally get them to leave us alone, this was after they had been contacted by the official recievers on her behalf as they were like a dog with a bone. They just wouldn't let it go!

I wish you nothing but luck with this company, in my opinion, and in my experience with them, they are evil and cruel.

Best fight fire with fire then ;-):grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is a letter along these lines OK or is it too aggresive

 

 

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

I am writing in response to your letter (copy included) of 25th July 2008 in which you claim I owe the sum of £49.17 with regards to an eBay account in my name. Please be advised that I do not have an eBay sellers account, nor will I be paying any money to Intrum Justicia or eBay Europe SARL.

 

Please take this as a formal warning that I do not take too kindly to un-solicited letters from companies requesting money. Your letter offers no evidence (nor does it offer to provide any) of any alleged debt/outstanding account. To put my mind at rest, as I’m sure this is all a mis-understanding, I require you furnish me with a signed agreement between eBay and myself that outlines the account you mention.

 

If you cannot/will not supply this information, I will have to make a Data Protection Act 1998 Subject Access Request in order to find out how you obtained my details, and where this alleged “debt” came from. The Subject Access Request is a legal procedure which you, by law, have to follow. I fully intend to carry out this procedure if I find the documentation you supply (at my informal request) fails to address my concerns.

 

At this time - as there is no documentation to support this claim - I am unable to assist with this matter. Please ensure that any future correspondence includes all the relevant documentation – Failure to provide this will result in me having to take legal action as I consider your efforts at money extortion to be tantamount to harassment.

 

Due to your lack of signed documentation between myself and the original creditor, you may formally consider this “debt” in dispute – and as such, you are not permitted to attempt collection of this money without first referring back to the original creditor. If I do not hear from you within 7 days, I shall consider this matter closed and no further correspondence will be entered into.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Intrum Justitia will chase anything. They sent a collector round to my house many years ago to collect a £1.63 debt out standing on a old Halifax credit card. Incured interest apparently, from when I paid it of in full.

 

But the onus is on IJ to prove there is a debt not on you to disprove it. So if you have it in writing from eBay that you never had a sellers account. Let them prove otherwise. The letter you have posted above should be sufficient.

 

Don't let them intimidate you into paying anything you don't owe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...