Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks all. Think I have come to a plan dx please correct me if I am getting you wrong but I am going to go down the route you suggest. simply stop payments for now until I receive a DN and it gets marked on my file. Then contact each lender and start making token payments to each one. i then assume most like they will then at some point sell to DCA. Once they are sold I’ll be coming back to see how best I deal with it.  Let me know if I am making some error in judgment or missing anything with my plan 
    • while politicians trough at subsidised bars and canteens, claim thousaands in expenses while letting out their properties and tories vote to leave UK children hungry That ALL needs to stop
    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt paid off on prepay meter - BG add more


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5812 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I've had a good search around this forum and elsewhere but can't seem to find anyone in the same situation(not quite the same issue as CSJ2K's post). I'll be as brief as I can and hopefully someone will be able to advise...

 

I have prepay meters with British Gas which was installed to deal with a gas & electricity bill debts. Back in in April the remaining debts finally hit zero. For a couple of months now I've been enjoying paying for gas only, rather than an additonal £10/week towards each debt.

Then last weekend when I topped up - it suddenly started taking money for gas debt again! (£7 of a £10 topup). I checked the stats on the meter and there's another £53 debt on there, to be taken off at £10/week. I was livid and spent almost 2 hours on the 'phone to BG over a couple of days. Their explanation is that it's for the difference between the debt that built up between me agreeing to a meter and it being installed.

I still have to check my bills to verify that - which I'll be doing this weekend. But my main point is - what gives them the right to do this?

I explained that I wasn't informed this was about to happen, but the guy from BG just said it doesn't matter - they're allowed to under the terms and conditions. I asked him to quote the section of the T&C's that allows for this but he couldn't - he said it wasn't explicity mentioned that they could do it, but neither was it explicitly forbidden. I pointed out that neither was it explicitly forbidden for a team of BG engineers to turn up at my door and re-plumb my digestive system from behind with 15ft of copper piping - but it would still be an unacceptable shock if it did happen!

So my questions are - has this happened to anyone else? Does anyone know if British Gas really are allowed to chenge the setting on the meter without informing the customer?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest this action is highly questionable. My understanding is that BG should have advised you of the shortfall by sending a statement to you. As to the legal position it is subjective but when the original debt was set it they should have taken a reading and set the debt accordingly. My advice would be to put your complaint in writing and advise them that you require a response within 14 days. If this is not done or you receive an unsatisfactory response, I would contact Energywatch for them to take up the case on your behalf. Once they get involved, a BG Customer Service Manager must respond to them within 10 working days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fudges,

 

Just read your thread and it suddenly rang a bell. I to have a prepayment metre because of debt to BG the something happened to me recently. The debt was at zero so I was changing suppliers. Then I got a statement in showing I was still owning them £85 I phoned them they gave the some reason they gave you - they were not helpful in fact they had a serious attitude problem. Any they let my change in supplier go thru' and sent me a bill quickly followed by a threating letter follow equally quickly by a solicitor letter - I paid in my own good time.

 

Sorry I know this is not much help but what I wanted to say BG is the most expensive gas provider there is. I went on to the eneragy help line and found that ebico is the cheapest for people with payment metres as the don't charge extra for the service.

 

Sorry if you knew this already.:smile:

 

AJ

:-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input folks. I'll do just as you suggest Noggsy. I tried to look up T&C's on their website but can't find anything. There's a link to 'Codes of Practice' - these turned out to be a series of leaflets advertising their services. Sent them a request for the information via the website and it just went blank! (I'll see if the requested 'copy to me' turns up in my mail box).

 

AshleyJane - no apologies needed! It's good to know I'm not the only person this ishas happened to, I couldn't find any references to it happening anywhere online. Glad you got your issue sorted out, I hope your new supplier's more co-operative.

 

Insult is added to injury here because we've been harrassed by BG for the last 3 years for a bill from our old property after we moved out. The tenants that took over didn't pay a bean and BG couldn't trace them, so they started on us instead. Despite sending them tenancy agreements and even their letter confirming we'd changed address this one goes on and on. They've used three different collection agencies (not at the same time though, or I'd have them for that).

 

Given their complete lack of co-operationon the meter issue, and the on-going harassment problem, I'm of a mind to start some serious complaint procedures.

Thanks for your help.

 

ps - huge thx for the tip on ebico AJ, looks like a great move - think I'll do the same

Edited by fudged
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...