Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
    • Santander have sent their final response and have agreed that they were in the wrong. They will be refunding me the amount I am due and £50 for the delay.  Just the interest factor would be more than double the £50 that they are offering. Thinking to just close this and move on. Is this what you would do?  Opened a FOS case on the 1st of June but haven't heard back yet. 
    • It just been delivered and ive had a live chat with p2g to get some proof of deliverey and they send me a picture of the parcel placed in a gas meter box which they class as a ' 'Safe Place'  and not placed into the hands of the buyer which is either a good thing as the buyer can claim he never received It so i can claim against p2g or a bad thing . Do p2g have coordinators when taking pictures and scanning of parcels ?  I know Royal Mail do ... I'm going to send the buyer a message and see what he says
    • Eight in ten voters support blocking bonuses for polluting water firm bosses INEWS.CO.UK Polling for i exposes level of public anger over sewage dumping  
    • Wow thats incredible. Thank you so much
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Forgottenone/Capone CCA/Default


Guest forgottenone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5783 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest forgottenone

Hello. I was keeping a record of their calls, along with all other creditors. I don't and haven't been answering them, however. Purely because there is nothing to discuss on the phone and because I've already instructed them not to. So, to avoid getting into the inevitable discussions ... not answered. There is now a block on my phone line as per my letter above. I read somewhere else this week on another source about dealing with these tactics from DCA's creditors ... and apparently this is okay for me to do this ... eg when it becomes apparent they've ignored your request to stop. Had to do it, or ... well, I don't want to be in hospital again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest forgottenone

Oh, sorry, yes, they were calling twice a day ... up to three before I blocked them. Oddly, those times seemed to coincide straight after I posted here ... may have been pure random coincidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason for asking is that they are actually committing a criminal offence - a possibhle route is to get the directors charged under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (ss1&2) and the Communications Act 2003 (s127) backed up by the Administration of Justice Act 1970 (s40). I have posted a thread about it in this forum http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/152151-volunteer-wanted.html

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Yes, saw that, but couldn't reply on it then had to dash out. Back now. I agree entirely about the criminal offense thing. Had witheld numbers today and yesterday ... can't be certain it's a creditor but obviously they don't want me to knoe who is calling. Four so far. Logged them, anyway. I'd be willing, but compared to some I may not have had enough calls eg dozens a day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest forgottenone

The situation currently with Capital One is:

 

Produced an application form which was also forged. Application form confirmed being unenforceable on CAG, but also not what I requested. This is presently being queried eg account in dispute but also the different handwriting, amongst other things. Will shortly, on the advice on someone on CAG, be writing to their customer complaints department.

 

So, until they provide what was requested, still in dispute/default. Ongoing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be willing, but compared to some I may not have had enough calls eg dozens a day.
Two or 3 a day where you answered over a period of time would be enough IMHO

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Right this is the situation here ... right now with Capital One. Healthwise I am detiorating very rapidly ... this week received some potentially devastating news in that direction ... and pretty soonish I am not going to be able to deal, handle or even begin to deal with any DCA's or any creditors. You could say things are worse than bad. So, trying to cope with detiorating health, consequences of previous events is enough really to be contending with. And the fact, if what the outcome of hospital this week is verified ... I may not even be around much longer regardless anyway.

 

Received this from Capital One today ...

 

er.jpg

 

As threads have been merged I will update the situation as follows:

 

1 1st request CCA May; no reply for over a month; gained verbal confirmation from Royal Mail July it was untraceable; postal order remained uncashed

 

2 Left with no choice, as obviously I needed the confirmation as proof they had received it - and to produce later should I need to etc - had to CCA them again

 

3 Received an application form, with forged handwriting

 

4 Wrote explaining this, but also that I didn't recognise the handwriting

 

5 Now received this template letter ... doesn't address any of the issues I raised

 

6 Really have not a clue where or what to do from here. So am looking to more help. The reason I don't have a clue is because I am trying to fight against ill health, also deal with a disability that is destroying me mentally and physically every second of every day. And no one can stop it. And now facing another disaster ... keeps on coming ... never stops ... with whatever comes next after this week ... determining how long I have left to live. Sorry, I know how that sounds but this is what I am coping with right now and have been for over 2 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Well anyway ... another member is having exact same trouble as myself ... except in my case they've entered my date of birth, handwriting ... is forged, and is not mine. Also the rest of the 'form' they've sent is dodgy looking as well. Found this letter on the other thread and would it be applicable to my own situation?

 

Account in serious dispute

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Thank you for your response to my request under the Consumer Credit Act section 78..

 

As you must realise this agreement does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer credit Act and is therefore unenforceable under section 127(3) of the same act. Furthermore, the signature on the document doesn’t appear to be genuine and may have been forged in an attempt to mislead me into believing that the agreement is legally enforceable. I hope that you take this matter seriously and fully investigate my complaint as matters arising from such actions would be viewed has criminal.

.

I shall also be considering contacting my MP and all regulatory bodies over your conduct.

 

I except a response within 14 days

 

If I can avoid doing so, even though within my rights to ... I want to avoid words like 'reporting the matter to the police'. And TBH Capital One - as the above letter indicates where it says you are welcome to report this to the FOS but we will still pursue the debt anyway ... don't need to say just shows the contempt for regulations Capital One has. It will just provoke a kneejerk reaction; perhaps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Okay, getting really mixed up. Been looking around CAG for anything applicable to this situation ... for reference etc ... came across this as it's the same template reply for the same application form aka 'CCA' ...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/150236-capital-one.html?highlight=capital+one

 

Just I'm reading a lot about ignoring some letters, but not others ... on lots of other similar threads about Capital One agreements. I know this isn't enforceable for example ... so should I 'ignore' at this stage ... as just getting template letters - that letter sent to me isn't even relevent anyway as the account is already 'closed' defaulted *in as much as the default notice itself was dodgy itself* passed to Debitas ... and refers to adverse credit etc ... if payments aren't made ... so much for Capital One keeping on top of correspondence then - and simply wait for the next stage?

 

Looks like I will be trading template letters for example right now. Just getting really confused as what to do next more than anything. Probably not making much sense right now ... trust me .. it's even worse ... for me to try and make sense of anything, let alone put it into words ... just a losing battle it seems. Things just won't function properly anymore it seems. Just really terrifying TBH. Losing sense of things like this.

 

I will send the letter I pasted above but does anything else need to go into it ... or is that okay as it is? What I mean is ... from reading Havinastella's thread ... there's a lot about mailer applications - which this would have been at the time - and photocopies, also where the terms and conditions were eg on the back ... or on separate sheets. Whether I just leave all that stuff out or what?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it is odd, and I may have explained it on this thread before (if so, apologies) but sending an agreement that complies with s78 and sending an agreement that is enforceable are in no way related!

 

For s78 compliance they can send a 'reconstituted' agreement with no signature and T&Cs from a different century.

 

To be enforceable, they must send at least a document (in whatever form) that contains your signature and the prescribed terms - this may be an appliaction form with the prescirberd terms on the back (although they must prove that the prescribed terms are the ones you signed up to). In court, they must produce an original of such a document not a copy.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...