Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

what to do


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5772 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i did put thread up but cant find it now,but would like to ask for advice i have been getting letters saying im refusing to pay which i have,nt have been paying since 2006,so i sent two letters recored delivery so they would have to sign for them anyway got another two letters saying you have no intion of paying this debt and we,ll take tou to cour and you,ll have to pay 150 cort costs now do i respound to the letter or send another one to them,its BLS COLLECTING FOR lLOYDS but they just dont want to know so please what do i do

rakker

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like this one but there is a shorter version you might prefer in the templates. I just think this one will give more of a jolt, I've had admission of no CCA in response to this. Game over :)

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLWDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

 

Account Number

 

 

With reference to the above agreement, I require that you provide me a true copy of the credit agreement

 

I am aware that section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 sets out clearly what is required to comply with my request and quote “shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it” For clarification I require a copy of the agreement, any terms and conditions from the time when the agreement was executed together with a copy of current terms and conditions and a copy of the cancellation notice if the agreement refers to “Your Right to Cancel” within it. I also require a statement of account as set out also within Section 78(1).

 

 

If there were no terms and conditions then please confirm this in your response

 

I am entitled to receive the information on request. I enclose a payment of £1.00, which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I note that section 172 outlines that statements by creditors are binding where made under inter alia section 78(1) and I take this to be that any reply made in response to this request is binding upon you. Therefore you should ensure that all documents request are supplied. Any missing documents will be considered not part of the agreement and could therefore affect the enforceability of anything you send.

 

I understand that Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1569) at regulation 2 sets out the required time frame for compliance with this request as being 12 working days from receipt

 

Should you fail to comply with my request as outlined above, I shall consider the account in dispute. I am aware that where a creditor fails to supply the requested information the creditor’s rights to enforcement are restricted until such time as they comply. I am also aware that there are certain terms that are required to be within the “Agreement” and should these terms be misstated or not present the agreement can be rendered unenforceable in law.

 

Notwithstanding the above, I note that the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1557) at Regulation 3 allows the Signature box and signature to be omitted in a copy document but the copy document must contain all the terms off the agreement contained within the signed executed original document

 

I respectfully request that you provide a copy of the original agreement signed by myself that you hold on file and while I accept that you can omit the signature box for the purposes of compliance with my request, you will be aware that any challenge to the agreement in court would require the signed copy of the original agreement. If you still reject this, please provide clarification on the status of the Original Credit Agreement and confirm either that you hold the original signed agreement on file or a copy of it on microfiche or that you no longer hold the file

 

Also please provide details of who I may address a subject access request to under the Data Protection Act 1998 section 7 so that I may obtain a copy of the original agreement should you fail to forward a copy in respect of this request

 

Therefore I look forward to receiving this information within the time frames as indicated above

 

 

If you do not understand this letter, you should seek qualified legal advice

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zazen i have four accounts with them do i put all account numbers on and do i need to sent more than one pound,im not with there bank any more but just to let you no my friends son pays it into there bank with there paying in banks which they sent me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these bank accounts or credit cards. I'm not really up to speed on bank accounts as I've only dealt with cards.

 

For cards I would send a copy of the above letter for each account with £1.00 for each (not sure about that but someone will put me right if not)

 

If it is a bank account (s) hopefully someone will come along to advise. :)

 

Print your signature and send by signed for delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

just to update regarding BLS I had,nt got round to sending them another letter,but this morning asking me to ring them,and underneath one line saying you must keep up the payments,so i think the penny has dropped as i sent two recorded delivery to them,and someone phoned the house my friend answer and when she mention the letters he put the phone down,ive been paying them since 2006 not alot but what i can afford its better than nothing,but they threaten with bailiff & court but i was paying into there bank with the paying in books they sent me,so i think they would have got laugh out of court

Rakker

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not phone these people, insist that all correspondence is done via letters. At least then you have a true record of what has gone on. DCA's are not known for their memory by the time matters get to court.

good luck

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

can they do this BLS have sent me aletter saying i have to pay ten pound next month,but i cant pay them any more so what do i do,is this legal that they can up payments

Rakker

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only pay them what you can afford at the time....however now you have sent them the CCA request, you have put the debt into dispute....If they continue to harrass you by phone, bear in mind that the OFT says this....

 

Section 2.8 (k) Deceptive and/or Unfair methods

 

k. not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or

disputed debt.

 

If they continue to call you after you have made your bona-fide request for your agreement then send this by recorded delivery

 

Company Name

Road

Town

City / County

Postcode

 

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXX

 

Dear Sirs

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

I am also suprised to have to remind a Debt Collection Agency of the OFT's guidelines on debt collection section 2.8 (k) which state that it is an unfair/deceptive method to continue to carry on collection activity when a debt is queried or disputed.

 

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

[NAME HERE]

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you 42Man

i did,nt get round to sending them CCA ,as we,ve had two deaths in the family and now another relation is dying,so do i just send aletter saying i cant pay any more but still keep on paying the mount that they agreed to in the beginning

rakker

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rakker

You need to send the letter as outlined by ZW above, also send the letter about harrassment that 42MAN has done for you, semd them both signed for delivery. I may be wrong but once you send the letter ZW has done for you the debt will be in dispute until they come up with the credit agreement. So I would hold off making any further payments until they produce the credit agreement. If they can't produce the agreement then as far as I know the debt is unenforcable. But wiser heads on here will advise you better if I am wrong.

DON'T SPEAK TO THEM ON THE TELEPHONE

Just make a note of the time and date that they telephoned you and don't make any further offers to pay them money

They are trying to scare you into paying money you don't have, just hold your nerve. Think of this, even if it went to Court a Judge won't order you to pay more than you can afford.

best regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you lets help sorry if i seem abit vague do i just copy the letters from above and send them,i do have one problem the letters go to my friends house as its her son who pays the payments into the bank for me,but i will write them letters now but i would like to keep paying so my friend dos,nt get the hassel of them,could you please advise

rakker

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Letshelp thank you for your help sorry to sound abit vague do i copy the two letters from above,i would like to keep on paying what i can ,as the letters go to my friends house as her son pays the payments into the bank and if i stop paying them then shes going to get the hassel ,and as shes deaf she dos,nt realy here what there saying,could you give me some advice on this please,thank you

rakker

Link to post
Share on other sites

rakker,,,,copy the letters but edit to suit your account numbers etc.

 

and DO NOT hand sign them ~ print only.

 

btw,,you say the letters go to your friends....are they addressed to your name?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to ask again but do i put the piece put the line thats in red on my letter,ive been trying to copy these two letters,so i can re-write them but not having any luck as only get have of the lines,so looks like i,ll have to write it by hand and then print it,unless anyone can suggest some other way of doing it

rakker

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rakker,

As Stikky62 advised you, just amend the letters to fit your personal circumstances.

BTW means By The Way.

Any further questions feel free to post them, remember get those letters of asap.

best regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do i put the piece put the line thats in red on my letter

 

If you mean the "i do not acknoweldge any debt with your company" bit, it seems kind of pointless if you've been making payments.

It doesn't really make a difference to what you're asking for ~ CCA ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me why you should not SIGN these letters by hand?

Just curious.

The financial system is collapsing, time to raise a glass to the end of the biggest pyramid scheme in history - The Debt Industry :whoo:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Well, I will leave it to others to explain ... cos there are plenty, many reasons not to. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have done the letters and just left the red words out as im still paying them so your right it would be pretty pointless,Stikky62,just have to wait now and see what they do,and thank you all for your help

rakker

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...