Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help with parking ticket summons


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5836 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I recieved a letter today 18-06-08 from harrogate magistrates court stating that I have to appear in court in harrogate on the 3rd July to answer charges of parking on yellow lines while delivering goods to a shop for 2 mins .

 

This happened on 16-4-08 and i also have to answer for incorrect number spacing on my registration (which at the time was correct) I remembered going out of the shop to the police officer who immedeatly cautioned me and told me I had been there for 10 mins which was total rubbish, he then informed me that my number plates were illegal and he was going to report me.

 

I had heard nothing from them until today, They have offered me to plead guilty by post but have not said what the penalty will be !

 

This cannot be right can it ?

 

I thought you had to be notified within 14 days of any intended prosecution

 

HELP !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I recieved a letter today 18-06-08 from harrogate magistrates court stating that I have to appear in court in harrogate on the 3rd July to answer charges of parking on yellow lines while delivering goods to a shop for 2 mins .

 

This happened on 16-4-08 and i also have to answer for incorrect number spacing on my registration (which at the time was correct) I remembered going out of the shop to the police officer who immedeatly cautioned me and told me I had been there for 10 mins which was total rubbish, he then informed me that my number plates were illegal and he was going to report me.

 

I had heard nothing from them until today, They have offered me to plead guilty by post but have not said what the penalty will be !

 

This cannot be right can it ?

 

I thought you had to be notified within 14 days of any intended prosecution

 

HELP !!!

 

He reported you to the courts so the next thing normally is a summons, if you dont agree with the charges then plead not guilty and attend to defend your case. The penalty will be what the magistrates decide on the day (with in their guidelines) but if your innocent then attend and defend it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If what you have received is a Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty, I would seriously consider accepting that. You will have to have very strong evidence to counter the copper's evidence.

 

Do you agree that the number plates are dodgy?

 

You must look at this from the financial position only. If you go to court and lose your fine will be highet and there is the £15 victim surcharge on top.

 

With this sort of issue I would also double check on pepipoo.

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter is not a fix penalty offer.

 

It states that the court will pass sentence on you. Ther is no offer of how much it will cost.

 

I still need confirmation that this letetr has been written in the correct time peroid as I believed that they should have written to me within 14 days of the offence, I need someone to confirm this, (I know this is true for speeding offences, as I have seen it on this forum).

 

On the officers attatched statement it also states that the numbers were less than 1" apart, (The correct plates measured between the gaps are only 10mm not 1" = 25.4mm) he also stated in his statement that the letters were more than 2" apart which is also incorrect. He was with a community support officer (A pretend policeman !) and was quite simply showing off to this guy thinking i'm gonna do this guy. There is no mention that I was delivering goods to the shop across the road nor that i was there for 2 mins max and was returning to move the car.

 

I feel really annoyed that this guy has gone out of his way to make my life hell for doing a job !

 

Clarification of the above by someone who know the legislation on this would be appreciated as the police statement is wrong !

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 14 days you are referring to is in respect of the requirement to serve a notice of intended prosecution. This can either be given verbally at the time by the reporting officer or it has to be served within 14 days. It only applies to the following offences:-

 

a) Dangerous Driving

b) Careless & Inconsiderate driving

c) Leaving a vehicle in a dangerous place

d) Dangerous cycling

e) Careless & Inconsiderate cycling

f) Failing to conform with the indication of a police officer when directing traffic

g) Failing to comply with a traffic sign

h) Exceeding temporary speed restrictions imposed by s 14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984

i) Exceeding speed restrictions on a special road

j) Exceeding temporary speed limit imposed by order

k) Speeding offences generally

 

Is it a summons you have received? If so, what are the exact offences you have been summonsed for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

Thanks for the reply,

 

The offences are

 

pnld code H5239,

Contrary to (9) section 1and 5 of the road traffic regulation act 19844 and schedule 2 to the road traffic offence act 1988

 

And

PNLD code H764

Contrary to section 59(1) of the vehicle Excise and regulation act 1994.

 

I have just checked on the dvla site for registration marks and the details the officer has given in his statement is completly wrong, will this hold any weight ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the details given by the PC don't match what DVLA have then it could be useful to you. I would print off a number of copies to take to court with you, though the first date will be for you to appear and enter a plea. It will be adjourned if you plead not guilty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lot of info on the dvla site about plate spacing etc, including diagrams etc. Its designed for manufacturers of the plates, but should do for your needs.

 

Print it off, with the web details on the bottom of the paperwork as well (to prove its come from DVLA site), and go out and check your plate.

 

If its all in order, take the plate with you to court !. Dont clean it, as that will only make you look like you've just had it made up.

 

Is it a new or newish plate ?. Does it have the (legal requirement) makers name and postcode at the bottom of the plate ?. Its an offence for the maker of the plate to mis space lettering - and should provde you with some come back on them if you loose.

 

I have seen a case where someone took photos of their plate in to court (the plate was blatently mis spaced), and the prosecution simply pointed out that the plate had 'not for road use' stamped into the bottom of the plate. He lost. And from what I can remember, ended up with £200 fine, and DVLA withdrawing the registration mark.

 

Oh, dont forget DVLA can, and will withdraw the mark if you get found guilty. They almost never used to do this, but since its become a money grabbing department .....

All opinions & information are the personal view of the poster, and are not that of any organisation, company or employer. Any information disclosed by the poster is for personal use only. Permission to process this data under the Data Protection act is NOT GIVEN to any company, only personal readers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...