Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax CCA request


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5315 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

I have done everything in order to gain my CCA agreement and waited the 12 working days + 30 calendar days. Nothing arrived.

 

One week later a copy of a credit card application for Bank One arrived with a copy of the terms and conditions of the Halifax Credit Card

They state that this fulfills my CCA request.

I believe this does not comply from reading other threads?

Am i right????

 

I now today have received a default notice from the Halifax stating they want £575 paid by 6th June 08

I am now worried as this is getting quite serious and if i dont pay the 575 they want the full balance of £8100

 

WHat do i need to do now, im stuck and confused, i cannot have a ccj as this is a breach of my job conditions.

 

Many Thanks

 

Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure why you would want to CCA them, if you cant risk a CCJ.

 

I doubt they will turn up an agreement, and I suspect that the Default Notice is faulty, but HBOS will probably take it all the way to issuing claim. They may not win, but they will certainly test your nerve.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will ignore anything you do regarding this. Is the default notice a propper one or a "Final Notice"? A Default on your credit file is as bad as a CCJ, as far as lenders are concerned.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Samcook.

 

Can you post the Application and Default Notice they sent ?

 

Remove all personal details.

 

If all they sent you is an Application Form, they are having a laugh.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Edited by maroondevo52
Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

My scanner is on the fritz so have typed the letter received from Halifax below in relation to the default notice.

Can you take a look, i will get the application form scanned in tomorrow, (i received the completed application form with a copy of the current terms and conditions)

 

Dear XXXXXX

 

IMPORTANT YOU SHOULD READ THIS CAREFULLY

 

This is a default notice served under Section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

Clause 2.2 of your terms and conditions details of the minimum payment you must make each month. You are in breach of that clause as arrears are outstanding.

You must pay £562.69 into your credit card account no XXXXXXXXX before 6th June 2008

IF THE ACTION REQUIRED BY THIS NOTICE IS TAKEN BEFORE THE DATE SHOWN NO FURTHER ENFORCEMENT ACTION WILL BE TAKEN IN RESPECT OF THIS BREACH

IF YOU DO NOT TAKE THE ACTION REQUIRED BY THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE SHOWN THEN THE FURTHER ACTION SET OUT BELOW MAY BE TAKEN AGAINST YOU

We will terminate our agreement with you and close your credit card account XXXXXX. You must pay the full balance owing on the account immediately. If you do not do this, we make take legal proceedings against you and or instruct a debt collection agency to recover any amount you owe us on your account.

If your account conditions allow, we may also transfer money from any other accounts you may have with us to reduce the debt outstanding.

You and any authorised users must stop using your cards immediately. Your cards must be cut in two pieces through the magnetic strip on the back of the cards and returned to us at the address overleaf before 6th June 2008. If your cards have already been returned please ignore this request.

If you have not paid the amount requested above within 28 days of this letter or made satisfactory proposals to do so, we will pass details of the default to a licensed credit reference agency and this will be recorded on your credit file.

IF YOU HAVE DIFFICULTY IN PAYING ANY SUM OWING UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR TAKING ANY OTHER ACTION REQUIRED BY THIS NOTICE. YOU CAN APPLY TO THE COURT WHICH MAY MAKE AN ORDER ALLOWING YOU OR ANY SURETY MORE TIME.

IF YOU ARE NOT SURE WHAT TO DO, YOU SHOULD GET HELP AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, FOR EXAMPLE YOU SHOULD CONTACT A SOLICITOR, YOUR LOCAL TRADING STANDARDS DEPARTMENT OR YOUR NEAREST CITIZENS ADVICE BUREAU.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very important to note the date of the default notice. If the date is after 22nd May then it is faulty. They must allow 14 days after date of service to remedy the default.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default notice dated 23rd May 2008

 

Allow two days for service 25th May then fourteen days is 8th June, So they have not allowed time for service, shot themselves in the foot again.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

It took around nine month from the default they issued me, to them making a claim.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Reported and noted Sam.please be a little patient.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sam

 

THe application form (image0002) is just that, an application form dated 1999. It would be enforceable if it had the p[rescribed terms on the back. However, the T&Cs tehy have sent are clearly recent ones (£12 charge for late payment indicates that they are later than April 2006).

 

What they have sent does comply with your request under s78 of the CCA 1974.

 

They have not sent a copy of a properly executed agreement as defined by s61 of the CCA1974 so therefore it can only be enforced by a court by virte of s65. S127 limits such enforcements to documents signed by teh debtor and having the prescribed termswithin themselves, whic what theyt have sent you clearly does not. THerefore it is not enforceable.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

You could try this one...

 

Thank you for your response to my request under the Consumer Credit Act section 78.

 

I am pleased to see that you confirm this as a true copy of the original agreement executed by yourselves on the XXXXX.

 

As you must realise this agreement does not conform to sections 60(1) and 61(1) of the Consumer credit Act and is therefore unenforceable under section 127(3) of the same act.

 

 

You had until (date here) to provide me with the true copy I requested. After that date you entered into default of my request and I am therefore advising that the matter is now in dispute . Whilst the matter is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, make any further charges to the account or pass the account to anybody else.

Please note you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies including any defaults. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I sent the above form 42man to halifax, i have now had a response claiming that all points have been met?

I am somewhat confused, i am also waiting for my charges to be listed.

 

Link to their response, they say current and historic terms and conditions, i have put all correspondence

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the above form 42man to halifax, i have now had a response claiming that all points have been met?

I am somewhat confused, they say current and historic terms and conditions, i have put all correspondence on photobucket with links

I am also waiting for a list of charges put on my account

 

Link to their response below

 

http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr314/samcook1703/halifaxresponse.jpg

http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr314/samcook1703/halifaxresponse1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have sent you historic and current T&Cs then tey have complied with your request under s78 of the CCA 1974. THat however, does not constitite an enforceable agreement

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the above form 42man to halifax, i have now had a response claiming that all points have been met?

I am somewhat confused, they say current and historic terms and conditions, i have put all correspondence on photobucket with links

I am also waiting for a list of charges put on my account

 

Link to their response below

 

http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr314/samcook1703/halifaxresponse.jpg

http://i495.photobucket.com/albums/rr314/samcook1703/halifaxresponse1.jpg

 

 

wow this is a really interesting response i think.

 

Are creditors finally realising that while we understand they have complied (up to a point) with CCA request that we also understand that it doesn't automatically make the production of a non-signed agreement enforceable?

 

I must say, it's a totally different kind of reply than i have ever received!

 

"We have complied with section 78 of the CCA 1974 and we are not legally obligated to provide you with the signed credit agreement. We only have to provide you with the signed credit agreement when we seek to legally enforce the debt or take legal action against you."

 

"For the avoidance of doubt, the Consumer Credit Act 1974 does not prohibit collection activity when an account is in dispute." No, but OFT Debt Collection Guidance does! :)

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I too am in a the same position with the Halifax. I think we all need some expert guidance now as to how to further proceed as effectively they have tossed the ball back into our court.

 

However I feel that they are hiding behind the constructed agreements that they are sending out.

 

If I was a CC Company and new I had an enforceable agreement I would just automatically send it out. They know presumably what the law dictates so I can only assume that failure to produce the document means that they are unlikely to have an enforceable one.

 

After all if you had something that was 100% enforceable you would shoot everybody down - Now pay up or else.

 

I think they have a problem

 

How do we proceed next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...