Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

advice plz- metropolitian collections. urgent!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5861 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi guys

 

took out a loan in jan 05 with HSBC, due to OH financial status, payments fall solely on me, the last payment made to HSBC was jan 08. today i

received a letter from Metropolitan collections acting for HSBC dated 17 april (but postmark stamped 23 april) giving me 7 days to reply!!!!!! which is today- typical in it.

the amount is for a few thousand, at the moment i am not in a position to pay the original monthly payment.

 

should i CCA metropolitan first and go from there or write with an offer of payment?

 

cheers guys

 

bev

Link to post
Share on other sites

First, don't be tempted to call MCS (who are HSBC's in-house DCA); keep everything in writing.

 

Don't worry about their silly unilateral deadlines; their system is computerised and churns out letters every so many days. Dating letters well before they are posted is an old MCS trick - I have one dated Boxing Day!

 

Sending a CCA request is a good start. Have any charges been added to the account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks!!

 

not sure if any charges have been applied, i'll send off a CCA, but feel a tad cheeky doing it as i've been paying loan every month until jan this year!!

 

cheers

 

bev

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made payments to MCS for almost three years, then discovered CAG, CCA'd them and found they had no agreement, and that the amount they still claimed was about a tenner short of the charges they'd applied. So, I stuck a claim in; HSBC sold it to Robinson Way but I successfully slapped them down, got the default removed, and am waiting for the claim to be dealt with, along with all the others.

 

I then went on to discover that HSBC had no agreement for my Visa card, so I suggest that a CCA is always worthwhile, and £1 well spent.

 

HSBC are the cheeky ones, for failing to ensure that their agreements are legally compliant, and then expecting you to pay for their mistakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We dealt with Metropolitan, and I wish I had found CAG then, unfortunately in our case the debt was sold on to Rockwell and only then did I find this site. What I will say was after about 12mths of paying Metro £1 a month they did call and offer to knock a 6k debt to 2k, but we couldn't manage it.

 

Anyway your in the right place now :)

 

GL Lumi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi guys

 

sent off my CCA letter the recieved it on the 2nd may 08. recieved a letter from MCS dated 27 april 08 stating 'intend to instrust DG solicitors to issue legal proceedings and apply for a charging order'.

 

today letter off them 'thanking me for my recent payment of £1.00 on the 2nd may 08, whilst this indicates your intention to repay this debt we do not appear to have a firm committment in the form of a repayment plan'.

 

i have no CCJ against me for this 'debt' so i believe they are unable to apply for a charging order at the moment.

 

but what i bloody cheek- the CCA letter was quite clear(used template one) so do i assume they havent got the credit agreement and are trying to scare me into paying or write again stating my letter was requesting the credit agreement and if they read letter correctly they would know the £1.00 payment was for that.

 

many thanks

 

bev

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

sent off my CCA letter the recieved it on the 2nd may 08. recieved a letter from MCS dated 27 april 08 stating 'intend to instrust DG solicitors to issue legal proceedings and apply for a charging order'.

 

today letter off them 'thanking me for my recent payment of £1.00 on the 2nd may 08, whilst this indicates your intention to repay this debt we do not appear to have a firm committment in the form of a repayment plan'.

 

i have no CCJ against me for this 'debt' so i believe they are unable to apply for a charging order at the moment.

 

but what i bloody cheek- the CCA letter was quite clear(used template one) so do i assume they havent got the credit agreement and are trying to scare me into paying or write again stating my letter was requesting the credit agreement and if they read letter correctly they would know the £1.00 payment was for that.

 

 

Is this a new defense tactic against the onslaught of CCA letters they receive. it would not surprise me DCA tend to fight fire with fire. You make a complaint or dispute a figure and instead of a wriiten response they send you a demand for payment or court action. this has happened 5 times to me.

 

You have to admire the cheek:

'thanking me for my recent payment of £1.00 on the 2nd may 08, whilst this indicates your intention to repay this debt we do not appear to have a firm committment in the form of a repayment plan'

 

Has anybody had similar reactions? I feel a letter to the FOS coming on I wonder if £400 fine will deter them from gross incompetence, which is what interpreting the CCA letter in that way amounts to

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys

 

CCA letter was sent recorded.

i assume they have the same group of people working at this office as they do on HSBC telephone banking, as they obviously dont understand plain english.

cheers

 

bev

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the 12+2 days is up Bev...send them this...

 

Account In Dispute

 

Ref:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On **DATE** I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. A copy of which is enclosed for your perusal and ease of reference.

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default on **DATE**. You have also cashed the £1 I sent you which is the maximum amount you are allowed to charge for my request.

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore

 

 

You are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation.

 

If that request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days your client commits a summary criminal offence.

 

These limits have expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

And

 

(b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...