Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO Services - Company House info


UK26
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5702 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

here it is

 

 

Application / Licence Details

Licence Number:0555914

Licence Status:Current

Current Applicant / Licensee:

Business Name Company Registration Number

 

HFO Services Limited 05120067

Categories:

 

Consumer credit

Consumer hire

Credit brokerage

Credit reference agency

Debt Adjusting/Counselling

Debt collecting

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:No

 

Trading Name(s) (Historic):

HFO Services Limited

HFO Group

Roxburghe

HFO Capital

HFO Capital

 

Issued Date: 26-Sep-2004 Expiry Date: 25-Sep-2009

Legal Formation:

Body Corporate (incorporated inside UK)

Current Individuals that run the organisation:

Name Position

 

Badri Nathan OFFICER

Kevin Stuart Harper OFFICER

Historic Individuals that run the organisation:

Name Position

Bardi Nathan OFFICER

Nature of Business:

Debt Collection

 

Current Address(es):

Address Type Address

Correspondence Roxburghe House, Lavender Park Road, West Byfleet, Surrey, KT14 6NA

 

Principal Place Of Business Roxburghe House, Lavender Park Road, West Byfleet, Surrey, KT14 6NA

 

Registered Office 4, Carlton Gardens, London, SW17 5AA

 

Historic Address(es):

Address Type Address

Principal Place Of Business 1, Copsem Lane, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9EU

 

Principal Place Of Business Grafton House 28-32, Grafton Road, New Malden, Surrey, KT3 0AA

 

Principal Place Of Business Grafton House, 28-32 Grafton Road, New Malden, Surrey, KT3 0AA

 

Registered Office ., Carlton Gardens, London, SW17 5AA

Registered Office 1, Copsem Lane, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9EU

Registered Office 4, Carlton Gardens, ., London, ., SW17 5AA

Registered Office 4, Carlton Gardens, London, SW17 5AA

Registered Office 4, Carlton Square, London, SW17 5AA

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of these coud be "virtual offices" i.e. they don't really exist.

Have just been digging around Cayman Islands and offshore stuff. The islands have been in trouble due to allowing drug dealing and money laundering on their teritory.

It seems it is cvirtually impossible to sue any of these Cayman businesses and the reason HFO will have set up their to accept receivables (debts) is there is no tax to be paid at all..ever.

So OCs sell to HFO Cayman and don't pay any VAT to the UK. What happens next? I doubt they are properly assigned to UK they just use the Lavender Hill mob and Turnbul eejits to collect. This is the big question is their action lawful? Do they pay taxes in what they receive or is it simply any debt collected in the UK go straight back to the Cayman Islands and no tax again.

P.S. Just a thought but if they can't be sued in the CI then no-one in the CI can sue here. I know they need an address for service of papers so they're covered from that point of view.

Edited by Rhia
add ps
Link to post
Share on other sites

No HFO Services there. I notice that it states they have no right to canvass off trade premises therefore if they pay a visit to anyone or threaten to do so they are in breach of their licence. My understanding is that they are already breaking the law by not advising the office of fair trading of the new directorship and business address.

 

Had to chuckle about the debt counselling.......what a joke. Will let the OFT know their licence needs updating

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have no credit info on HFO Capital

 

They do have 2 Consumer Credit Licences

 

 

 

 

0572489 HFO Capital Limited Current

0614989 HFO Capital Limited Current DUBLIN 2

 

 

Another thought for you. I have just come across the CCL number for HFO Capital Limited (unincorporated in the UK)??? 572489 What is going on there...any idea's?
Link to post
Share on other sites

some more people to look into -

 

are all the Nathan family criminals?

 

Alasdair John Turnbull

Hind Aladwani

Jonathan Nicholas Woolf

Kevin Stuart Harper

William Horgan

Vasantha Nathan

Badri Nathan

Tara Nathan

 

 

 

HFO Capital Limited 446327

Categories:

Consumer credit

Consumer hire

Credit brokerage

Credit reference agency

Debt Adjusting/Counselling

Debt collecting

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:Yes

Issued Date: 26-Mar-2008 Expiry Date: 26-Mar-2013

Legal Formation:

Body Corporate (incorporated inside UK)

Principal Place Of BusinessRiverside, Two, Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Dublin, DUBLIN 2, Ireland

 

 

 

Principal Place Of Business Grafton House 28-32, Grafton Road, New Malden, Surrey, KT3 0AA

 

Registered Office 4, Carlton Gardens, London, SW17 5AA

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

No HFO Services there. I notice that it states they have no right to canvass off trade premises therefore if they pay a visit to anyone or threaten to do so they are in breach of their licence.

 

SNIP

 

Had to chuckle about the debt counselling.......what a joke. Will let the OFT know their licence needs updating

 

I think it actually means they can't cold call on businesses or visit businesses without an appointment, but they should still be able to make personal home visits legally - unless you put a nice brass plaque next to your front door with Registered Office of ABC Limited on it :wink::grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unincorporated associations

 

Unincorporated association status is usually chosen when a number of individuals agree or "contract" to come together for a common purpose - which may be of a social nature.

How unincorporated associations operate

 

Unincorporated associations are run informally. They are relatively straightforward and cost nothing to set up. They make their own rules for running the organisation and set these down in a democratic constitution. A management committee is elected to run the organisation on behalf of the members.

Unincorporated associations do not need to register with or be regulated by either Companies Registry or the Financial Services Authority. They enjoy greater freedom of operation than a company. For example, they don't have to submit annual returns.

If an unincorporated association has charitable objects (or aims), it can apply to the Charity Commission for charitable status. Upon approval it will have to comply with the Commission 's regulations. Read about setting up a charity from the Voluntary and Community Unit on the Department for Social Development website - Opens in a new window.

Unincorporated associations may also have trading or business objectives or carry on commercial activities.

Although an unincorporated association cannot own property, it may be able to set up a trust to legally hold ownership of property and assets for the community they are intended to benefit. See the page in this guide on trusts.

Personal risk

 

Unincorporated associations have no separate legal identity. This means that their members will have to sign loans and contracts as individuals and carry the risk of personal liability.

This form is unlikely to offer a long-term solution if you intend to sign contracts or expand the enterprise. You should consider incorporation if you intend to:

  • take on employees
  • raise finance, apply for grants or open bank accounts
  • issue shares
  • enter into large contracts
  • take on a lease or buy freehold property

This should help you to gain access to a wide range of financing sources that will not put your personal assets at risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unincorporated associations have no separate legal identity. This means that their members will have to sign loans and contracts as individuals and carry the risk of personal liability.

so their you have it they are personally liable,so if they have debts already in there name they can now be sued under their own name and then be struck off from holding a directorship or having any associations with either ......i think sawer has a debt enforcement order against the company HFO not sure on that until we see SAWER come back to this thread

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

i posted this in january 10/2008...so every one should make there complaints head on about the whole organisation HFO and turnbull and rachet

perhaps then we may at last get a judgement against them... just not enough people complaining about hfo as this letter i got today explains

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('The Act')

Complaint Against: HFO Services Limited

Licence No: 555914

 

Thank you for your email received on 17 December 2007, regarding the problems you have been experiencing with the above trader.

 

We are always interested to receive complaints such as yours as they are a vital source of information in helping us to investigate the behaviour of traders that hold consumer credit licences. The trader you have complained about does hold a consumer credit licence.

 

If a business wishes to be involved in activities relating to consumer credit or hire, including debt collection, they must have a consumer credit licence. The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has a duty to monitor the fitness of all traders that hold a consumer credit licence. In considering fitness, we take into account whether a business has engaged in unfair business practices. This includes any evidence that traders have not complied with any guidance issued by the OFT. The OFT has, for example, issued guidance to consumer credit licence holders engaged in the debt collection industry. The guidance sets out minimum standards that we expect of debt collection traders, consistent with fitness to hold a consumer credit licence. The guidance is intended to ensure that debt collectors treat debtors fairly. Non-compliance with this guidance will call into question the fitness of licence holders and applicants.

 

We investigate all complaints received about consumer credit licence holders and, where we have the necessary evidence, we do take appropriate action. In our initial investigation of all complaints we consider how many complaints we have received overall and how strong the evidence is to support any action. It is unlikely that a licence would be revoked on the strength of one complaint. Where we have strong evidence that unfair business practices have occurred, we may take steps to revoke or refuse the licence of the business in question. However, if we are to do this we need to take account of factors such as the number of complaints received how recent they are and how well evidenced. In cases where evidence is less strong we may issue a warning letter to the business putting it on notice that its behaviour, if repeated, will call their fitness to hold a licence into question. Any action we do take has to be proportionate. If an approach from the OFT makes a trader change its behaviour and treat consumers fairly in future, this is preferable to putting a trader out of business.

 

If we do take any licensing action against this trader it is likely that we would need to disclose your identity to this trader along with details of your complaint. I should therefore be grateful if you would provide me with written authorisation to disclose these details to the trader. I have enclosed a disclosure consent form for you to sign and return to me.

 

We have noted the details of your complaint, to consider alongside any other complaints we have received with a view to any licensing action we may decide to take. We may therefore contact you again if we require further information. Meanwhile, given that the sanction of licence refusal or revocation is such a significant one there are constraints built into the process for taking such action. For example, because of restrictions in Part 9 of the Enterprise Act 2002 relating to disclosure of information, we cannot disclose specific details about any action we may take, nor comment on any adverse information we hold on individual licence holders.

 

Unfortunately the OFT has no power to intervene in individual disputes, and therefore we are unable to assist you directly in this matter. However, you will be able to obtain practical advice by contacting Consumer Direct either by telephone (08454 04 05 06) or online at www.consumerdirect.gov.uk.

 

Consumer Direct is the first point of call for consumers, providing first tier advice on a range of consumer matters, including advice on shopping, information on consumer rights and practical guidance on individual problems and how to gain redress. Where further help is needed, such as specialist advice, face-to-face assistance, or intervention, Consumer Direct refers consumers to another agency, such as Trading Standards Service, that is best placed to assist.

 

Furthermore, the Financial Ombudsman Service ('FoS') can help with most complaints about consumer-credit products and services if the consumer has failed to satisfactorily resolve the matter directly with the financial institution itself. The FoS can be contacted at:-

 

The Financial Ombudsman Service

South Quay Plaza

183 Marsh Wall

London E14 9SR

Tel: - 0845 080 1800

 

www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk

 

I have also enclosed details of organisations which may be able to assist you. Thank you again for writing to us and bringing this matter to our attention.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Miss Jo Kwok

Enquiries and Preliminary Investigations Centre

Markets and Projects

Permission To Disclose Complaint

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('the Act')

Complaint Against: HFO Services Limited

Licence No: 555914

 

Reference: Epic/Enq/E/22497

 

*Please delete as appropriate

 

I give/do not give* my consent for the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) to disclose details of my complaint concerning the above trader, including my name and address details, in any further action that it may take under the Act or under any other legislation administered by the OFT.

 

I also confirm that I have no objections/object* to the OFT using the information provided by me in the performance of any of its functions and disclosing that information to others where legally permissible. By way of example, the OFT may disclose such information in connection with enforcement or regulatory action under its own powers or may refer the information to another government department or enforcement authority.

 

Signed: …………………………………………………… …………… ……………………

 

Print name: …………………………………………………… …………… ……………..

 

Address (Please print): …………………………………………………… …………… …

…………………………………………………… …………… ………………….

…………………………………………………… …………… ………………….

…………………………………………………… …………… ………………….

…………………………………………………… …………… ………………….

Date: …………………………………………………… …………… ……………..

 

Please note the OFT can only use your details in any action we may take against the above trader if you give your written permission for us to do so.

 

 

 

 

Additional contact details

 

In the event of the OFT needing to contact you for further information, it would be helpful if you could provide the following contact details. Please note these further details will not be disclosed to the trader.

 

Telephone number: (Home)……………………………(Mobile) ……………………….

 

Preferred time of contact by telephone: ……………………………………………….

 

E-mail address: …………………………………………………… …………… …………..

user_online.gifreputation.gif report.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Having just checked with the OFT, the failure to notify the OFT of the change in directors to HFO company no 05120067 renders their CCL invalid and they are trading illegally.

 

If the company report is still valid (graydons 05/08/08) the OFT have had no notification of a change in officers.

 

The OFT consider this to be a serious breach to the regulations and as such they stated that it is illegal for a company to trade under its credit license (0555914) whilst this continues.

 

Hmm me thinks a world of hurt is on the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...