Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm trying to unravel this – but I get the impression that there was no contract between you and EVRi and that you didn't even choose them but instead you decided use some third party parcel broker in the USA which organised the delivery. Is this correct? EVRi came into the picture because they would then eventually selected for part of the journey although you had no knowledge that it might be them and I suppose it didn't really matter as long as the item got to you. Secondly, I really don't understand the journey which this item made. You bought the item from somebody in the USA. They then were meant to dispatch it to you to another address in the USA but for some reason or other it came to the UK and then into the hands of EVRi at which point it was lost or stolen. More confusion here because you now tell us that EVRi marked it as being out for delivery but it was never delivered. This suggests that it was going to be delivered to a UK address but earlier on you said that it was going to be delivered to USA address. I think you need to look at the story. Maybe show it to a friend of yours who is not particularly where the details and ask them if they can make head or tail of it and then come back to us with clarification so that we fully understand. Also, I think we'd like to know what the item is, how was it declared, what was the value which was declared. You said it was a valuable item because it was rare and collectable. I gather from this that it is non-fungible. We need to understand more about this. Was an insurance policy purchased to cover it during the delivery process. I understand that this rare and collectable item be valued at £200. Have evidence this value. This could become very important. Also you have given is no idea when this happened. We need to understand the full timescale. There are a number of possibilities here including the possibility of the contract action against EVRi on the basis of your third party rights or an action for negligence but we need to know far more and we need to get a story that makes sense.   Finally, I understand that you have sent the letter of claim. What did it say? How much time did you give them? What did you expect to happen as a result of the letter of claim? Whatever the answers to those questions might be, clearly you had no idea how to proceed after having sent such a letter. A letter of claim is meant to be a serious threat of some legal action if some condition which you have stipulated is not complied with. You set a deadline for compliance and at the end of that deadline you issue the court action. Clearly you are not in a position to do that so your letter of claim is a bluff and undermines your credibility and it will find its way into the EVRi wastepaper basket – if it's not there already.  
    • Good morning. I just wanted to check something please. The other side have moved slightly and negotiated a full and final offer price to end this matter. I am happy with this. However, I want to make sure this is the end of the matter and am emailing the following over to them prior to payment. Is this enough to ensure they can come back for nothing else? Thanks -------------------------------------------------- Dear Sir.   With regards your last email below.   I am pleased to agree to the full and final settlement figure given below.   Can you confirm this payment will be in full and final payment with no further claim to be brought against me in this matter?   Best regards
    • 100% sure I didn't receive it, that why my first post is with the £100 letter.
    • Engine, the technology business Starling Bank was built on, has been busy launching banks around the world, from Romania to Australia.View the full article
    • use this your WS and inc this as an exhibit off to bed now 3 nights been up till 4am aurora watching wont be on too early as it's lambing season out herding with the dog. your WS main thrust is the debt would now be SB'd , the DN was filed xxxyrs+months after it should have been thus unlawfully extending  SB date to infinity. highlight their admittance regarding errors at that time period in your 'redetermination'  paragraph. agreements unreadable. would have already been written off due to SLC age write off criteria has they not issued the claim to stop the SB clock when they had no paperwork to prove their case in the 1st place. never earned over threshold. dx       Erudio - stopped sending email deferments won at FOS DRN-4141462.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ebay Nightmare (please help)


azidas
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5867 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, so say for instance the car was indeed fault free when it was purchased and the seller was telling the truth, the buyer went down the road and hit the kerb resulting in the problem discribed. The buyer then claims the car has a problem, without telling the seller about hitting the kurrb. It would be for the buyer to prove it had this unroadworthy fault prior to purchase.

 

Unfortunatly unless the fault was due to wear and tear making it unroadworthy then even an Independant Inspection could not state when the problem first came about.

 

I,m not being arguementitive here, just giving advice which after all was what was initially asked for.

.

I understand that, but this is where the balance of probabilities comes into it and other elements, such as seller's other feedbacks on car selling (Ooops, not looking good for him there!), his response when notified of the problem, etc... And yes, it could be sod's law that something happened after buyer drove off, it does happen, but that would be down to the judge to decide, as I said before.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, Thankyou all for your replies very very helpful! .. Here's an update;

 

The person who also left him, feedback did not reply to my message unfortunately.

The seller sent me this message;.. please withdraw the bad feedback you left and il withdraw mine as your the one thats loseing your 100% feedback worh thinking about thanks

i replied as follows;.. no sorry i have lost a lot of money as this car is undriveable and dangerous, the MOT will be investigated and i will be speaking to your local trading standards agency, and tax office unless you make arrangements to refund in full and collect the car. only then i will consider withdrawing the feedback, i am not fussed at the feedback you left me.

I have doubts that this car passed an MOT a week before picking up the car. i will now contact the garage it was serviced at and to see if they can cast any light on it..

The seller has not replied to the letter that my local TSA told me to send him and i want to check the MOT and speak to his local TSA and maybe even Tax office? before i take this any further as i cannot afford to lose on court expences, (i am a full time apperentice roofing apperentice supporting my fiance' and our 5 month old baby). Which brings me to the next potential problem (if i was to win the case) could i end up with him paying me small monthy payments? In addition to the loan re-payments i have to make for this car i must also now find another car :(. Thanks again for all of your help, much appericiated.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complaining to the Tax office won't help you - indeed if he does owe tax on his additional income, and charge him for it - it takes precedence over any claim YOU have, and he will not be in a position to repay you. Yes, he can ask for time to pay (this is assuming you win) and £50 per month over the next 2 years is a possibility!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They amount he pays will be upto the court. However if you explain to the court fully your circumstances they will probably order he pay as much as much as he can or you could request an oral examination after he has completed an income form.

 

There's a long way to go before it gets into court & in the meantime he might come to his senses & repay you as even if he only has an unpaid CCJ against him then he's going to find it difficult to move on his life

 

Once he realizes you mean business & the effect it will have on him if he doesn't he may just repay you

Link to post
Share on other sites

He may claim he can't afford but he could then be summoned, at the claimants request, to an oral hearing where if he tells porkies to answers of the court he would be guilty of perjury.........more than one way to skin a cat

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off I would start to do things in a proper manner if not already done so. Like for instance; sending a letter before action,

conducting negotiations to settle this claim without court proceedings

 

Please bear in mind however that even though you have filed for Small Claims this is not yet set a track and the Judge may ask for a pre-hearing trial before deciding this. He/she is likely also give both parties directions. i.e. Independant Inspection.

 

I think you need to get your case in order as the points you make about the MOT, Trading Standards, Tax Office will not help you in your case. All these people will give you advice be it right or wrong for you, however, they protect the position in terms of there individual Laws and will not act in a way to support your case directly. You can refer the findings to the court in support of your case, but these things take forever.

 

Fees

 

When you make a claim you will have to pay a court fee. (Correct me if I am wrong)

 

If you are claiming:

 

Up to £300 £30 fee

£301 to £500 £50 fee

£501 to £1000 £80 fee

£1001 to £5000 £120 fee

 

This is what I would do. Gather your facts, Send a letter recorded delivery giving 14 days to reply. No reply with satisfactory resolution? Then fill in a claim form (N1) and make a copy for each defendant and the courts.

 

Don't worry to much at this stage as the defendant has 14 days to reply to the claim form.

 

At anytime you need a little extra time then submit a stay of proceedings and the reason why.

 

You really need to stop communicating through eBay and stop messing around and show him you are for real without empty threats. Until you do this then persoanlly I think your chances of a refund are slim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, the fees changed a few months back:

 

up to £300

£30

£300.01 – £500

£45

£500.01 – £1,000

£65

£1,000.01 – £1,500

£75

£1,500.01 – £3,000

£85

 

£3,000.01 – £5,000

£108

 

 

See here:

Fees

s.14 for possibility of exemption or remission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a connisseur of bangers of the highest order (with 27 years driving experience of some of the finest examples of jalopies) I suggest that one of the wheels simply needs balancing or at worst a wheel bearing may need replaced.

 

You can get this done or checked for buttons at any tyre place, like Kwikfit or ATS.

 

Other pearls of oil stained wisdom:

 

1) Never buy or bid on a car without actually driving it first, at speed with the engine hot.

 

(Assuming you know what you are on about. Buying cars off Ebay or any auction is asking for trouble, unless you really know about cars or are prepared to take a gamble.)

 

2) Never buy a car with more wheels than seats

 

3) Green cars bring bad luck and red cars cost more to insure.

 

Before you do anything, get the wheel balancing checked. If the wheels are out of balance, they can do nothing but vibrate at speed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes, I do like my bangers!

 

Model Owned Price paid

 

 

1959 Austin A35 1980-81 (£10)

 

1964 Austin-Healey Sprite 1981-82 (£175)

 

1963 Austin-Healey Sprite 1982-83 (£150)

 

1972 MG Midget 1982 (£75)

 

1969 Triumph Vitesse 1983-4 (£200)

 

1969 Triumph GT6 1984-5 (£200)

 

1973 Triumph Spitfire 1985-7 (£250)

 

1972 Triumph 1500 1985 (£45)

 

1971 Triumph 2000TC 1985-92 (£145)

 

1981 Triumph TR7 1992-99 (£750)

 

1980 Triumph Dolomite Sprint 1999- present (£1000)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My 1st car was an E type:D ......................A Morris E type:rolleyes:

 

It even had cruise control............a dam great knob on the dash that you turned to increase the throttle:-D

 

It also had air con....................a bottom opening windscreen:-D

 

It had 4 inbuilt hydraulic jacks (1 in each corner).................but cable brakes:eek:

 

The headlight dip switch was on the steering wheel.................& the starter was a dip type switch on the floor. Could start it whilst shouting "look no hands":-D

 

Happy days

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bunch of hippies:eek: I'll have you know BW that I was a teddy boy long before I was a hippy (changed habits because of all that free lurv) & had you noted my 1st car your would have realized it.........was a 1939 model

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jon- interesting your Morris had built in hydraulic jacks. About ten years ago one of our local scrapyards was having a clear out. Basically he was closing down and get rid of everything.

 

In the middle of the vast yard, (where he had started piling up scrap cars just after the War) was a pile of 1920s/30s cars, vans, tractors, steam rollers, ex-RAF WW2 radar equipment, a narrow gauge steam loco from the local gas works and half a Halifax bomber.

 

At the top was a Wolseley of the same vintage as your Morris.

 

I climbed up this mountain of stuff to have a look and spotted the built in jacks. You just reminded me.

 

Under what was left of the carpet was a copy of the Belfast Telegraph dated 1947. The Wolseley must have been perched on the top of this pile since you were driving your Morris E Type!

 

The next time I called by, the collection of 1930s cars, vans and steam rollers was gone. I hope they found good homes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

May I repeat some advice that I received from a QC some years ago - sue on a point of money, not a point of principle. If you don't think that you will get any judgement paid, then don't throw good money after bad.

 

Having said that , you may be able to register a judgement (on the basis of misrepresentation or sales description) and then apply to garnish his Paypal account. This requires that you find a UK address for Paypal to be effective though. A court garnish is a direction to divert funds issued to the holder of those funds (usually a bank or other debtor to the defendant). The garnish is only effective on the day it is served, so you need some luck on your side as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...