Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all,        I really need to start my own thread on this Claim with Overdales/Lowell for a Cap One debt. but have already got to this stage .. My initial question for the moment - until replies come in - is that I figure my main stance is that a purchased debt cannot be claimed, debts can only be claimed by the original issuer of the debt .. but mediation is about coming to an agreement. So would I be acting in bad faith if I enter into mediation yet not seeking to come to a financial agreement? Also, I need to reject the scheduled time slot and ask for another as I'm not going to be free during those hours. The wording of the email gives the impression that I am given this one slot and if I reject it, then I am rejecting mediation - there is no mention of rescheduling, only of freeing up the slot for others .. although, I would have thought it would say so, if there were no possibility to reschedule.. Can I ask for another date without issue?   Anyway, if it's more helpful, I am happy to post up my defence and start a proper thread? I had a lot on at the time and had to do things right away due to the time limits, so didn't feel I had time to come here and go back and forth for info, so put my defence together from reading through relevant threads, late at night. CCA request appears to have been fulfilled (I'm still to check the accuracy of the documents). The other thing, asking solicitors about the particulars of the claim, hasn't .. although I forgot to ask for proof of postage and didn't send recorded post either (whereas the CCA I did), so not sure if I can pursue that easily ..?  
    • There is a plea guilty website...   Screenshot 2024-05-22 144200.pdf
    • Looking for a bit of assistance. I moved into a rented flat on 20th April 2024. I viewed it on the 14th April. Before I moved into the flat, the letting agency provided me with an offer sheet, in said offer sheet I made a number of requests and conditions related to me progressing with assuming the tenancy. These were: 1. A professional clean of the flat prior to move in date. 2. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet be replaced prior to move in date. These were all planned actions by the landlord when I viewed it. I could see the boxes for the hob and other items in the flat. I prepared to move in on the 20th April but none of the work mentioned in the offer sheet had been completed. The standard of the clean was abysmal - mouldy food left in the fridge, nothing wiped down, bathroom mouldy etc. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were also not installed. I decided to not officially move into the flat as it was not in a condition as promised, my partner lives relatively close by so I lived with her initially. It was only on the 24th April that the hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were installed. The cleaners visited again 2 weeks after move in date (3rd April) and attempted another clean of the flat. Again, it was a poor job. I resorted to cleaning the flat myself. I have numerous pictures of the things I identified during my clean and have sent this all to the letting agency. Because of the issues faced, I asked the letting agency that the rent be reduced for the initial month. Exactly halved - to represent the 2 weeks that I was not living at the property. The landlord and letting agency have responded by saying that they will be willing to accept 1 weeks rent as a deduction but not 2. My question is, am I in a strong position to insist on the 2 weeks rent returned or have I been fortunate that they have even offered a weeks rent as a deduction? I would like to insist on the 2 weeks. I have paid the 2 weeks only as my rent collection date passed 2 days ago. Thank you for any assistance. Any further relevant details required let me know and I will provide.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parcelforce charge?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4874 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just got a parcel siezed by customs....Got charged VAT on it, which I suppose is all fair, but what I dont understand too much is the handling charge Parcelforce put on top of that. Can anyone explain this to me a bit more?

Thanks, Chris.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't 'seized', it was simply held for payment of tax. ParcelForce* has a sliding scale to cover their costs it processing the additional paperwork required, and this is reflected in their charges - which will be separate from the tax duty to be paid, VAT on the goods, the service PF provide on clearing the item through customs, plus VAT for their charges.

 

*As does all the other carriers/couriers who handle non-EU deliveries

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
It wasn't 'seized', it was simply held for payment of tax. ParcelForce* has a sliding scale to cover their costs it processing the additional paperwork required, and this is reflected in their charges - which will be separate from the tax duty to be paid, VAT on the goods, the service PF provide on clearing the item through customs, plus VAT for their charges.

 

*As does all the other carriers/couriers who handle non-EU deliveries

This has just happened to me too. OK so they may be at liberty to charge a fee, even though when I had the same thing happen with Royal Mail I was not charged by Royal Mail I just had to pay the VAT, but Parcelforce are charging me £13.50!! I telephoned them for an explanation as to what this charge was and they said it was to cover their admin costs for holding the parcel and informing me of the customs charge via letter.

 

Well the last time I printed of a standard letter - not personalised - put the single sheet of A4 paper in an envelope and run it through a franking machine it didn't cost me £13.50.

 

Extortionate charges if you ask me - rip off Britain - again!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

But your paper isn't "special" paper and your ink is just normal ink, and so on... [end of sarcasm] But if taking into account the whole letter process takes 5minutes to print/envelope up and post then ParcelForce staff are on over £500 per hour after deductions ;)

 

As If I remember correctly, any "admin charge" must reflect the actual costs incurred.

 

I would be writing to them asking for a full breakdown of this "admin charge" and shouting alittle more. You wont win, but it will make you feel much better.

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Admin charge fights = worth doing. Except against a government backed agency. You will never ever get the charge waived....but as Hobbie says, a rant might make you feel better :)

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

when I had the same thing happen with Royal Mail I was not charged by Royal Mail I just had to pay the VAT, but Parcelforce are charging me £13.50!!

 

Royal Mail charge about £8 or £9 (not sure of exact amount) in addition to the customs charge.

 

Well the last time I printed of a standard letter - not personalised - put the single sheet of A4 paper in an envelope and run it through a franking machine it didn't cost me £13.50.

 

 

It's a little more work involved than simply sending you a letter.

From the HMRC website:

 

They handle packages for customs examination and, if required, open and re-pack them... also store packages if customs need to make enquiries; for example, when the contents have not been declared properly by the sender.

 

I imagine this list is not exhaustive as to what is involved in the process.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would appear that as I have not agreed to this additional charge prior to purchase of the goods, in that I have entered into a contract with the supplier and full shipping charges paid and NOT entered into a contract with Parcelforce for their part in the chain, I might not be obliged to pay this fee. They 'make' the contract that they bind us to but just cos they say we have to pay doesn't make it legal ... we have not agreed this contract.

 

They are not legally allowed to hold my goods to ransom if I refuse to pay.

 

See these threads:

EDIT: it appears I cannot post the links before making 5 posts ...

Basically ....

 

Parcelforce have already paid the duty on the package, which is your choice to pay or not. It's not their right to decide whether or not you want the parcel released from customs. So it's not their place to make that decision for you. The parcel is yours and they cannot hold it to ransom. They have the power to waive the fee. I like the guy who went to the depot and told them he was calling the police to report the item stolen. The volkzone thread is the best one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Royal Mail charge about £8 or £9 (not sure of exact amount) in addition to the customs charge.

Unfortunately I have no control over who gets to handle my package when it arrives in this country ... this charge is 'invisible' and not something I have agreed to.

It's a little more work involved than simply sending you a letter.

From the HMRC website:

I think you took my exaggeration a little too literally.;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Born, I understand your position. But understand this. You are picking the wrong fight, as this is unwinnable. This is NOT the same situation as, for example, the banks or utility companys. Parcelforce and the Royal Mail have legal exclusions from liability in certain areas in court - I have no doubt that this charge will full under this exclusion.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I have no control over who gets to handle my package when it arrives in this country ... this charge is 'invisible' and not something I have agreed to.

 

If you are importing goods into this country it's your own responsibility to check what duty and fees associated with the import before you make the purchase.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I accept your comments and respect the fact that you are far more experienced in these matters than I am. I don't doubt that I will end up coughing up this charge, purely because I haven't got the front to see it to a satisfactory conclusion.

 

Unfortunately I am unable to post the links to the forum where I discovered that you can (legally) contest this charge.

If I refuse to pay the charge ParcelForce are not legally allowed to hold my package to ransom - called lien. Apparently delivery of my item is not dependent on me paying this charge.

 

I am still trawling through the other forum thread to get it clear enough for me to challenge ParcelForce but like most people I am not Watchdog / Don't Get Done Get Dom and as my confidence wanes so does my fighting spirit.

 

Good old rip off Britain :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have evidence to show that this can be legally challenged, I'm sure such information would be welcome here(I for one am happy to be proved wrong). Perhaps instead of the link, you could copy and paste some of the information here?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Far too much detail to copy and paste here but as I have now made more than 5 posts I can put the link in.

 

The most relevant stuff is from post number 149

 

Don't Let Parcelforce Steal Your Cash! - Page 15 - VZi

 

It would be interesting to hear what people on this forum think of this guys research into the charges :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I know this is an old thread by my query is related...

 

I received a VAT charge from parcel force and fee which I got waived as the parcel contained children's clothing which isn't VATable...

 

However I have now received a postcard with a charge of £1.10 from royal mail for the same parcel which I have to pay or they won't deliver it. This consists of 10p for the sender not paying the full postage and £1 handling fee.

 

I know it doesn't seem like much but it's the principle here!

 

Given the postage was paid in the USA and is in US$ how can they claim it is 10pence under? Surely that comes down to exchange rate?

Plus the parcel has been subject to checking for VAT, how do I know they didn't put it back together by adding extra tape etc which may have taken it 10p over!?

 

I can guarantee the parcel was weighed before being sent and the postage paid was as told.

 

Anyone got any advice on how to get it waived as it is plainly rediculous to claim 10p underpaid on something paid in US$.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure that you will find the £1.10 surcharge is for a completely different item.

 

I've had a few of these where people have just put a First Class stamp on an A4 envelope which doesn't cover the postage, and it results in a 10p underpayment as a Second Class Large Letter costs 51p to send, but a normal First Class stamp is only worth 41p, hence the 10p underpayment.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it seems you are right and it is for a different item. A birthday card for my son from his aunt.

 

So my question is now can they enforce a debt against a minor? I always understood that children were not liable for any debts in their name.

 

Anyone know if that is true or not and would it apply here?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're not trying to enforce a debt against anyone as no debt exists. They advised you that there was an item which required an extra payment to cover the surcharge, and you had two options - to pay the shortfall and receive the item; or to not pay it and not receive it.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought they were duty bound to deliver post and were not allowed to hold on to it.

Given the card has no return address (outside or in) they can not return it if I do not collect it.

If they cant return it do they then not have an obligation to deliver it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they are only obliged to deliver it if the correct postage is paid, otherwise why would anybody ever bother paying for postage!

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...