Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Luton V Lloyds TSB getting exciting now!!!


mack187
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6535 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All

 

 

I am currently in a DMP with Payplan, I owe Lloyds TSB about £9000 as one of my creditors, they have accepted the offers of repayment from payplan and I have started making payments, however yesterday I received a letter from Lloyds saying "further to our conversation we can now offer you refinance in the form of a loan for £9,000!!!!!!!!!" now correct me if Im wrong that is taking out extra credit which is illegal under a DMP and is what got me into trouble in the first place, this seems completely unethical to me and not the way a DMP should work, The worse thing is I never even had a conversation with them about this!!

 

Should I forward this to Payplan and let them deal with it?? Also should I complain to the Ombudsman??

 

Any advice will be greatly received

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first thing you need to establish is "WHO" did had the conversation with Lloydstsb ? Perhaps you should send them a DPA request for all the conversations they have on file with yourself, this should at least spread some light on the matter.

 

Personally, if you had not had the conversation and they claimed you did, threaten court action, i am sure there is something to gain from this, although at present, i dont know.

Lloyds TSB

Data Protection Act Sent 11/05/06

DPA Received 27/05/06

Charges and Interest calculations = £2932.47 (including costs)

Prelim Letter sent 30/05/06

First Refusal letter received 02/06/06

LBA Letter sent 05/06/06

Acknowledgment Received 07/06/06

Final Response Received 08/06/06

Claim Filed (6QZ42741) - 30/06/06

------------------------------------------------------------

Close Brothers (Warrior Group)

DPA Sent 30-05-06

DPA received 14/06/06

------------------------------------------------------------

Capital One - DPA requested 05/06/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Axleuk says, your first step should be to find out who exactly had the conversation about the loan amount. It would be worth speaking to someone at Payplan about the new offer of a refinance loan, and when you find out what the situation is re: conversations etc, almost certainly it'd be worth taking it to the Financial Ombudsman, and possibly the FSA too - I'm 99% certain this would be classed as "Irresponsible lending"!

reload vs Lloyds - £2703.11 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload vs Lloyds Round 2 - Prelim sent 27/03/07. £435 owed.

reload vs Capital One - £456.57 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload's mum vs Barclays - £745 owed. £375 partial settlement reached 17/10/06.

Lloyds Bank - The Template Response Letters!

 

Advice & opinions of reload are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. Please use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had virtually the same letter....

I'm with payplan too and a monthly payment has already been agreed.

Today, completely out of the blue, I get a letter saying that a refinance loan has been agreed for me but as my account with Lloyds is now inactive they require me to send details of my current account so they can send the funds for the loan.

As soon as I send them my account details they will send the finance agreement for me to sign.

I have never, ever requested this loan and can't believe they have tried this blatant approach to bleed more interest out of me.

I will be forwarding the letter to Payplan tomorrow, I know they probably wont take any action but at least they will know that I haven't been applying for more credit without telling them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worth keeping a copy Honestknob - the FSA may well be interested to hear about both your cases. I'll see if I can drag a mod in here, as it certainly sounds like a case of irresponsible lending to me...

reload vs Lloyds - £2703.11 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload vs Lloyds Round 2 - Prelim sent 27/03/07. £435 owed.

reload vs Capital One - £456.57 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload's mum vs Barclays - £745 owed. £375 partial settlement reached 17/10/06.

Lloyds Bank - The Template Response Letters!

 

Advice & opinions of reload are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. Please use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the other posters:

  • establish the facts
  • keep copies of all letters
  • request ALL notes via a Data Protection Act (full disclosure) request
  • send a letter of complaint to the FSA
  • send a copy of that letter to the bank

Go get the wunch of bankers...:)

 

See the steps I took to get my bank charges back.

Spiceskull v HSBC.

Thank you Consumer Action Group.

Read my blog.

 

Collage001.gif

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I am at the moneyclaim stage now and am getting excited and a little scared.

 

The preliminary letter was sent followed by the LBA letter- Both were rebuffed with their usual arrogance.

 

I am now on the money claim form and would like a little advice, I have got to the section "particulars of claim", now I know what it is technically but am a little new to this and was wondering if anybody had posted a rough template to help me along the way, any help is greatly appreciated and hopefully when I get my money back I can make a donation to keep this fantastic website going

Link to post
Share on other sites

Threads merged - please stick to one thread

 

There is a guide to completing the Particulars of Claim in the templates library.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Just completed my money claim form, this is a bit embarassing but does anybody know if the courts can help with me paying the initial cost, I am in debt management and just about to start a new job so money is really tight, I cant afford to pay the £120 costs at the moment but am claiming back £1,600.

 

Is their any help out there for someone in my position?

 

Thanks in Advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Court Fees - do you have to pay them?

 

 

 

You may be exempt from paying a court fee which means that you do not have to pay it, by law.

You will be exempt from paying a fee if:

  • You or your partner receive the benefit Income Support. Partner means someone to whom you are married, or in a civil partnership with; or someone who you live with as if you are married to them or in a civil partnership.
  • You or your partner receive Pension Credit guarantee credit.
  • You receive the benefit Income-based Job Seeker's Allowance.
    Either:
  • Your gross annual income (your income before income tax and other money is taken away) is less than £15460 and you receive Working Tax Credit with a 'disability element' or 'severe disability element';
    or
  • Your gross annual income is less than £15460 and you and your partner receive Working Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit between you.

HM Revenue & Customs send you an award notice that shows your annual income. This is your gross annual income. If it is more than £15,460, the court may suggest that you apply for remission. If you receive Working Tax Credit, the award notice will show if you receive a 'disability element' or 'severe disability element'

 

  • you are involved in a family case and receive 'Legal Help'. 'Legal Help' means the legal advice and assistance given under the Community Legal Service scheme. If you are not sure if the case is a family case, please ask a customer service officer at the court.

Note: If you want to apply for the refund of a fee because you received Working Families Tax Credit or Disabled Person's Tax Credit when you paid a court fee, please contact a customer service officer at the court.

If you would like to apply for exemption please read this guidance and then fill in the Application Form EX160 which you can also obtain from a county court office.

If you are exempt, you will find that you answer 'Yes' to one of questions 2f, 2g, or 2h.

When the court has dealt with your application form it may have decided that:

  • you are exempt from paying the court fee so that you do not have to pay anything, or
  • that you are not exempt from paying the court fee. The court may ask you to pay the whole fee, or suggest that you apply for remission. But if your circumstances change, you may apply for exemption again.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all,

 

Thanks for the information about court fee's

 

This is my particulars of claim, could someone have a quick skim over it and see if its good enough, I want to get this exactly right, Many thanks

 

"I have a contract with Lloyds TSB dated

around 1996 and which is conducted on

their standard terms and conditions.I am

claiming the return of money taken by the

defendant in the way of charges over the

last 6 years.I believe bank's charges are

punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-

estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant;

exceed any alleged actual loss to the

Defendant in respect of any breaches of

contract on the part of the Claimant;and

are not intended to represent or related to

any alleged actual loss,but instead unduly

enrich the Defendant which exercises the

contractual term in respect of such charges

with a view to profit. The contractual

provision that permits the Defendant to

levy such charges is unenforceable by

virtue of the Unfair Contract Terms in

Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999), the

Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the

common law. I have repeatedly asked the

bank to justify their charges but they have

declined."

 

Best of Luck to all fighting the good fight

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you not going for the s69 8% interest applicable when filing a court claim?

reload vs Lloyds - £2703.11 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload vs Lloyds Round 2 - Prelim sent 27/03/07. £435 owed.

reload vs Capital One - £456.57 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload's mum vs Barclays - £745 owed. £375 partial settlement reached 17/10/06.

Lloyds Bank - The Template Response Letters!

 

Advice & opinions of reload are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. Please use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damm, Forgot that, I need to make extra room for that then, 1080 characters really isnt enough to get your point accross, but I guess Money claim are receiving so many of these at the moment that they will understand either way, Still need to word it right though

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...