Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX 2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.   Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are They Being Lead On !!!


babynan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I wonder if any one can help, I am trying to help some friends get some answers because they dont know which way to turn

I will try to explain as briefly as possible but please bear with me if it goes on a bit as I want to try and be as precise as I can.....

 

My friends put their house on the Market early last Nov (2007) by the end of Nov thay had an offer, eventually price was agreed by all parties (this was all prior to HIPS). My friend explained that they had purchased a property abroad and intended to relocate, they were told that the sale would go through very quickly as there was no chain etc on either side. My friends told the agents they would be signing the contract oversea's for the pomise of sale and needed a rough idea of when sale in UK would be completed, they were assured that it would be completed by Mid Jan 2008. They duly signed Promise of Sale overseas and had a completion date for that property in Mid Feb. The lady concerned resigned from work, then after Chrsitmas they were told once again that Mid Jan would be completion time, so they started to put their stuff into storage.

mid Jan approached...nothing, Estate agent assured them that buyer really wants the place but now looked as if it would be delayed until mid/end of Feb, so my friends applied (and managed to get) an extension on the promise of sale abroad, they were going to have this extension until the end of FEb, but when the Agent from overseas spoke with the UK Estate Agent he was told that it would all most certainly be completed by the 9th March, so the extension was arranged for that date. In the UK still nothing has happened, my friends have had no feedback, their solicitors just say it has nothing to do with them as it relates to the transfer of the money. When they can get hold of the agent he says there is no problem just a delay with the transfer of money for the buyer. Now the agent form overseas has spoken again with the UK agent and he was told that the buyer had problems with the mortgage because he normally dealt with Northern Rock..............

They then went on and told him that a couple of weeks ago the buyer approached another lender and eveything is working out ok and all is being processed (they have still not told the seller/my friends this.) They also told the overseas agent that everything will be completed now by the 14th Mar............ Agent overseas not sure if he will be able to obtain a further extension on the promise of Sale there.

My friends managed to speak with the estate agent in the UK (he still has not metioned to them about the buyer going somewhere else for a mortgage) and he has told them that he is 90% certain that all will be completed by the 14th Mar:mad:

 

My questions/concerns are as follows:

If the buyer did go somewhere else for a Mortgage a couple of weeks ago, surely by now he would know if this has been approved?

If this has been approved, then why would there need to be a further delay?

If it has not yet been approved, what is the normal time frame when applying for a mortgage before you are informed if you can have it?

Why is the agent telling my friends that he is only 90% sure that ecverthing will be completed by the 14th Mar??

And is their solicitor legally able to find out if the buyer does have a mortgage or not?

Also would the buyer have had to pay any sort of deposit by now (dont know if this is done of not in the UK)?

 

Sorry if I have gone on a bit, but as you can image my friends are so stressed because they are having to look at bridging loans etc, which as we all know are expensive....and they do not have a clue as to what is going on, should they ask the agent to start letting others view the property again??? where can they go to get the answers that they need, or is this completely normal?

Please could someone offer some advice/help, would really appreciate it.

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether the buyer managed to obtain a mortgage from Company A or B, this is of no concern to the seller (apart from it's nice to know). Once a loan has been approved in principle some firms put in set processing times (in one case of 4 weeks!) simply because that was how they worked. That said, you can get an agreement in principle and a mortgage declined for very many reasons, lenders can be fickle, or discover something they don't like about their customer before the money changes hands. It is none of the sellers solicitor's business of the financial affairs of the purchaser UNLESS they have, as part of the documentation required identity and financial (credit file) searches to be disclosed.

 

A deposit isn't usually paid, but if there are ongoing delays, the sellers solicitor should have already put in place procedures to cover any shortfall to the original date of entry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Buzby,

 

Many thanks for your reply, you have at least helped me//my friends understand a bit more of how these things work, they were just very concerned that the estate agent was just giving them the run around (although it would not really be in his interests to do this as he also wants the sale for his commission), but they were getting concerned as to if they should consider at this stage to allow another potential buyers veiw the property..... but going by what you have said then I will let them know that they need to just bear with things and let them run there course.

Once again, thanks for your help:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may seem unfair, but can I suggest you LET others view the property. I have twice been caught by potential purchasers who could not raise the mortgage, so you could suggest to the original buyer that you need to impose a deadline (say 7 days) to formally agree to the sale and be legally committed, or you will re open the viewing. You can never have enough buyers, and it is unfair on the seller to be kept waiting. You're NOT saying your won't sell to the original purchaser, simply that they lose their right to exclusivity, so whoever completes the deal get's the keys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...